Cargando…

Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is recognised as a promising strategy to enhance good collaboration between clinicians and service users, yet it is not practised regularly in mental health. AIMS: Develop and evaluate a novel training programme to enhance SDM in psychiatric medication manage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramon, Shulamit, Morant, Nicola, Stead, Ute, Perry, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29067837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020764017733764
_version_ 1783280638889033728
author Ramon, Shulamit
Morant, Nicola
Stead, Ute
Perry, Ben
author_facet Ramon, Shulamit
Morant, Nicola
Stead, Ute
Perry, Ben
author_sort Ramon, Shulamit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is recognised as a promising strategy to enhance good collaboration between clinicians and service users, yet it is not practised regularly in mental health. AIMS: Develop and evaluate a novel training programme to enhance SDM in psychiatric medication management for service users, psychiatrists and care co-ordinators. METHODS: The training programme design was informed by existing literature and local stakeholders consultations. Parallel group-based training programmes on SDM process were delivered to community mental health service users and providers. Evaluation consisted of quantitative measures at baseline and 12-month follow-up, post-programme participant feedback and qualitative interviews. RESULTS: Training was provided to 47 service users, 35 care-coordinators and 12 psychiatrists. Participant feedback was generally positive. Statistically significant changes in service users’ decisional conflict and perceptions of practitioners’ interactional style in promoting SDM occurred at the follow-up. Qualitative data suggested positive impacts on service users’ and care co-ordinators confidence to explore medication experience, and group-based training was valued. CONCLUSIONS: The programme was generally acceptable to service users and practitioners. This indicates the value of conducting a larger study and exploring application for non-medical decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56975622017-11-27 Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians Ramon, Shulamit Morant, Nicola Stead, Ute Perry, Ben Int J Soc Psychiatry Original Articles BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is recognised as a promising strategy to enhance good collaboration between clinicians and service users, yet it is not practised regularly in mental health. AIMS: Develop and evaluate a novel training programme to enhance SDM in psychiatric medication management for service users, psychiatrists and care co-ordinators. METHODS: The training programme design was informed by existing literature and local stakeholders consultations. Parallel group-based training programmes on SDM process were delivered to community mental health service users and providers. Evaluation consisted of quantitative measures at baseline and 12-month follow-up, post-programme participant feedback and qualitative interviews. RESULTS: Training was provided to 47 service users, 35 care-coordinators and 12 psychiatrists. Participant feedback was generally positive. Statistically significant changes in service users’ decisional conflict and perceptions of practitioners’ interactional style in promoting SDM occurred at the follow-up. Qualitative data suggested positive impacts on service users’ and care co-ordinators confidence to explore medication experience, and group-based training was valued. CONCLUSIONS: The programme was generally acceptable to service users and practitioners. This indicates the value of conducting a larger study and exploring application for non-medical decisions. SAGE Publications 2017-10-25 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5697562/ /pubmed/29067837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020764017733764 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ramon, Shulamit
Morant, Nicola
Stead, Ute
Perry, Ben
Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians
title Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians
title_full Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians
title_fullStr Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians
title_short Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians
title_sort shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: a mixed-methods evaluation of a uk training programme for service users and clinicians
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29067837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020764017733764
work_keys_str_mv AT ramonshulamit shareddecisionmakingforpsychiatricmedicationamixedmethodsevaluationofauktrainingprogrammeforserviceusersandclinicians
AT morantnicola shareddecisionmakingforpsychiatricmedicationamixedmethodsevaluationofauktrainingprogrammeforserviceusersandclinicians
AT steadute shareddecisionmakingforpsychiatricmedicationamixedmethodsevaluationofauktrainingprogrammeforserviceusersandclinicians
AT perryben shareddecisionmakingforpsychiatricmedicationamixedmethodsevaluationofauktrainingprogrammeforserviceusersandclinicians