Cargando…

A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical performance of a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane, creos xenoprotect (CXP), with a reference membrane (BG) for guided bone regeneration at dehisced implant sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients with e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wessing, Bastian, Urban, Istvan, Montero, Eduardo, Zechner, Werner, Hof, Markus, Alández Chamorro, Javier, Alández Martin, Nuria, Polizzi, Giovanni, Meloni, Silvio, Sanz, Mariano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12995
_version_ 1783280654750842880
author Wessing, Bastian
Urban, Istvan
Montero, Eduardo
Zechner, Werner
Hof, Markus
Alández Chamorro, Javier
Alández Martin, Nuria
Polizzi, Giovanni
Meloni, Silvio
Sanz, Mariano
author_facet Wessing, Bastian
Urban, Istvan
Montero, Eduardo
Zechner, Werner
Hof, Markus
Alández Chamorro, Javier
Alández Martin, Nuria
Polizzi, Giovanni
Meloni, Silvio
Sanz, Mariano
author_sort Wessing, Bastian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical performance of a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane, creos xenoprotect (CXP), with a reference membrane (BG) for guided bone regeneration at dehisced implant sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients with expected dehiscence defects following implant placement to restore single teeth in the maxillary and mandibular esthetic zone and premolar area. Implants were placed using a two‐stage surgical protocol with delayed loading. Bone augmentation material placed at the implant surface was immobilized with CXP or BG membrane. Soft tissue health was followed during the healing period, and the defect size was measured at reentry and 6 months after implant placement. RESULTS: Of the 49 included patients, 24 were treated with CXP and 25 with BG. Patient characteristics did not differ between the two arms. In the CXP arm, the defect height at implant insertion was (mean ± SD) 5.1 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24) and reduced at reentry by 81% to 1.0 ± 1.3 mm (n = 23). In the BG arm, the defect height at implant insertion was 4.9 ± 1.9 mm (n = 25) and reduced at reentry by 62% to 1.7 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24). Assuming a margin of non‐inferiority of 1 mm, CXP was non‐inferior to BG. Membrane exposure rate was highest at week 3 in both arms, reaching 16.7% for BG and 8.7% for CXP. CONCLUSIONS: The new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane facilitates bone gain to support implant placement in expected dehiscence defects. The observed trend toward higher mean bone gain and lower exposure rate with CXP compared to BG should be further investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56976372017-11-28 A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure Wessing, Bastian Urban, Istvan Montero, Eduardo Zechner, Werner Hof, Markus Alández Chamorro, Javier Alández Martin, Nuria Polizzi, Giovanni Meloni, Silvio Sanz, Mariano Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical performance of a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane, creos xenoprotect (CXP), with a reference membrane (BG) for guided bone regeneration at dehisced implant sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients with expected dehiscence defects following implant placement to restore single teeth in the maxillary and mandibular esthetic zone and premolar area. Implants were placed using a two‐stage surgical protocol with delayed loading. Bone augmentation material placed at the implant surface was immobilized with CXP or BG membrane. Soft tissue health was followed during the healing period, and the defect size was measured at reentry and 6 months after implant placement. RESULTS: Of the 49 included patients, 24 were treated with CXP and 25 with BG. Patient characteristics did not differ between the two arms. In the CXP arm, the defect height at implant insertion was (mean ± SD) 5.1 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24) and reduced at reentry by 81% to 1.0 ± 1.3 mm (n = 23). In the BG arm, the defect height at implant insertion was 4.9 ± 1.9 mm (n = 25) and reduced at reentry by 62% to 1.7 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24). Assuming a margin of non‐inferiority of 1 mm, CXP was non‐inferior to BG. Membrane exposure rate was highest at week 3 in both arms, reaching 16.7% for BG and 8.7% for CXP. CONCLUSIONS: The new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane facilitates bone gain to support implant placement in expected dehiscence defects. The observed trend toward higher mean bone gain and lower exposure rate with CXP compared to BG should be further investigated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-18 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5697637/ /pubmed/27990692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12995 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wessing, Bastian
Urban, Istvan
Montero, Eduardo
Zechner, Werner
Hof, Markus
Alández Chamorro, Javier
Alández Martin, Nuria
Polizzi, Giovanni
Meloni, Silvio
Sanz, Mariano
A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure
title A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure
title_full A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure
title_fullStr A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure
title_full_unstemmed A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure
title_short A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure
title_sort multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12995
work_keys_str_mv AT wessingbastian amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT urbanistvan amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT monteroeduardo amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT zechnerwerner amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT hofmarkus amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT alandezchamorrojavier amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT alandezmartinnuria amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT polizzigiovanni amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT melonisilvio amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT sanzmariano amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT wessingbastian multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT urbanistvan multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT monteroeduardo multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT zechnerwerner multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT hofmarkus multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT alandezchamorrojavier multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT alandezmartinnuria multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT polizzigiovanni multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT melonisilvio multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure
AT sanzmariano multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure