Cargando…
A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical performance of a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane, creos xenoprotect (CXP), with a reference membrane (BG) for guided bone regeneration at dehisced implant sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients with e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12995 |
_version_ | 1783280654750842880 |
---|---|
author | Wessing, Bastian Urban, Istvan Montero, Eduardo Zechner, Werner Hof, Markus Alández Chamorro, Javier Alández Martin, Nuria Polizzi, Giovanni Meloni, Silvio Sanz, Mariano |
author_facet | Wessing, Bastian Urban, Istvan Montero, Eduardo Zechner, Werner Hof, Markus Alández Chamorro, Javier Alández Martin, Nuria Polizzi, Giovanni Meloni, Silvio Sanz, Mariano |
author_sort | Wessing, Bastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical performance of a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane, creos xenoprotect (CXP), with a reference membrane (BG) for guided bone regeneration at dehisced implant sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients with expected dehiscence defects following implant placement to restore single teeth in the maxillary and mandibular esthetic zone and premolar area. Implants were placed using a two‐stage surgical protocol with delayed loading. Bone augmentation material placed at the implant surface was immobilized with CXP or BG membrane. Soft tissue health was followed during the healing period, and the defect size was measured at reentry and 6 months after implant placement. RESULTS: Of the 49 included patients, 24 were treated with CXP and 25 with BG. Patient characteristics did not differ between the two arms. In the CXP arm, the defect height at implant insertion was (mean ± SD) 5.1 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24) and reduced at reentry by 81% to 1.0 ± 1.3 mm (n = 23). In the BG arm, the defect height at implant insertion was 4.9 ± 1.9 mm (n = 25) and reduced at reentry by 62% to 1.7 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24). Assuming a margin of non‐inferiority of 1 mm, CXP was non‐inferior to BG. Membrane exposure rate was highest at week 3 in both arms, reaching 16.7% for BG and 8.7% for CXP. CONCLUSIONS: The new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane facilitates bone gain to support implant placement in expected dehiscence defects. The observed trend toward higher mean bone gain and lower exposure rate with CXP compared to BG should be further investigated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5697637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56976372017-11-28 A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure Wessing, Bastian Urban, Istvan Montero, Eduardo Zechner, Werner Hof, Markus Alández Chamorro, Javier Alández Martin, Nuria Polizzi, Giovanni Meloni, Silvio Sanz, Mariano Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical performance of a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane, creos xenoprotect (CXP), with a reference membrane (BG) for guided bone regeneration at dehisced implant sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients with expected dehiscence defects following implant placement to restore single teeth in the maxillary and mandibular esthetic zone and premolar area. Implants were placed using a two‐stage surgical protocol with delayed loading. Bone augmentation material placed at the implant surface was immobilized with CXP or BG membrane. Soft tissue health was followed during the healing period, and the defect size was measured at reentry and 6 months after implant placement. RESULTS: Of the 49 included patients, 24 were treated with CXP and 25 with BG. Patient characteristics did not differ between the two arms. In the CXP arm, the defect height at implant insertion was (mean ± SD) 5.1 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24) and reduced at reentry by 81% to 1.0 ± 1.3 mm (n = 23). In the BG arm, the defect height at implant insertion was 4.9 ± 1.9 mm (n = 25) and reduced at reentry by 62% to 1.7 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24). Assuming a margin of non‐inferiority of 1 mm, CXP was non‐inferior to BG. Membrane exposure rate was highest at week 3 in both arms, reaching 16.7% for BG and 8.7% for CXP. CONCLUSIONS: The new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane facilitates bone gain to support implant placement in expected dehiscence defects. The observed trend toward higher mean bone gain and lower exposure rate with CXP compared to BG should be further investigated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-18 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5697637/ /pubmed/27990692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12995 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wessing, Bastian Urban, Istvan Montero, Eduardo Zechner, Werner Hof, Markus Alández Chamorro, Javier Alández Martin, Nuria Polizzi, Giovanni Meloni, Silvio Sanz, Mariano A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure |
title | A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure |
title_full | A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure |
title_fullStr | A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure |
title_short | A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure |
title_sort | multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wessingbastian amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT urbanistvan amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT monteroeduardo amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT zechnerwerner amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT hofmarkus amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT alandezchamorrojavier amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT alandezmartinnuria amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT polizzigiovanni amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT melonisilvio amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT sanzmariano amulticenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT wessingbastian multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT urbanistvan multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT monteroeduardo multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT zechnerwerner multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT hofmarkus multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT alandezchamorrojavier multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT alandezmartinnuria multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT polizzigiovanni multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT melonisilvio multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure AT sanzmariano multicenterrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialusinganewresorbablenoncrosslinkedcollagenmembraneforguidedboneregenerationatdehiscedsingleimplantsitesinterimresultsofaboneaugmentationprocedure |