Cargando…

Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group (TAG) conducts systematic reviews of the evidence for tobacco cessation and prevention interventions. In 2016 TAG conducted a priority‐setting, stakeholder engagement project to identify where further research is needed in the areas of tobacc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindson, Nicola, Richards‐Doran, Dan, Heath, Laura, Hartmann‐Boyce, Jamie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.13940
_version_ 1783280662383427584
author Lindson, Nicola
Richards‐Doran, Dan
Heath, Laura
Hartmann‐Boyce, Jamie
author_facet Lindson, Nicola
Richards‐Doran, Dan
Heath, Laura
Hartmann‐Boyce, Jamie
author_sort Lindson, Nicola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group (TAG) conducts systematic reviews of the evidence for tobacco cessation and prevention interventions. In 2016 TAG conducted a priority‐setting, stakeholder engagement project to identify where further research is needed in the areas of tobacco control and smoking cessation. DESIGN: The project comprised two surveys and a workshop. A range of stakeholders participated, including members of the public (smokers and ex‐smokers), clinicians, researchers, research funders, health‐care commissioners and public health organizations. The first survey phase identified unanswered research questions in the field of tobacco control. The second phase asked participants to rank these, with overall rankings calculated by combining scores across participants. The workshop allowed attendees to discuss prioritization of topics and questions in more depth. Workshop discussions were transcribed and analysed thematically, and a final voting activity at the close of the workshop allowed participants to choose topics to prioritize and to de‐prioritize. FINDINGS: A total of 304 stakeholders (researchers, health professionals, smokers and ex‐smokers, guideline developers, research funders and policymakers, representing 28 countries) identified 183 unanswered research questions. These were categorized into 15 research categories. A total of 175 participants prioritized categories and questions in the second survey phase, with ‘electronic cigarettes’; ‘addressing inequalities’; and ‘mental health and other substance abuse’ prioritized as the top three categories. Forty‐three stakeholders attended the workshop and discussed reasons for and against category prioritization. Prioritized research categories largely mirrored those in the survey stage, although ‘treatment delivery’ also emerged as a key category. Five cross‐cutting themes emerged: efficacy; relative efficacy; cost effectiveness; addressing inequalities; and different types of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There are many unanswered questions in the field of tobacco control. Stakeholders highlighted electronic cigarettes, addressing inequalities and mental health and other substance abuse as key areas for further research, and efficacy, relative efficacy, cost‐effectiveness and use of non‐randomized studies as important themes cutting across research areas. Future prioritization work would benefit from targeting non‐US and non‐UK stakeholders explicitly and from examining where priorities may differ based on stakeholder group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56976692017-11-28 Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project Lindson, Nicola Richards‐Doran, Dan Heath, Laura Hartmann‐Boyce, Jamie Addiction Cochrane Updates BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group (TAG) conducts systematic reviews of the evidence for tobacco cessation and prevention interventions. In 2016 TAG conducted a priority‐setting, stakeholder engagement project to identify where further research is needed in the areas of tobacco control and smoking cessation. DESIGN: The project comprised two surveys and a workshop. A range of stakeholders participated, including members of the public (smokers and ex‐smokers), clinicians, researchers, research funders, health‐care commissioners and public health organizations. The first survey phase identified unanswered research questions in the field of tobacco control. The second phase asked participants to rank these, with overall rankings calculated by combining scores across participants. The workshop allowed attendees to discuss prioritization of topics and questions in more depth. Workshop discussions were transcribed and analysed thematically, and a final voting activity at the close of the workshop allowed participants to choose topics to prioritize and to de‐prioritize. FINDINGS: A total of 304 stakeholders (researchers, health professionals, smokers and ex‐smokers, guideline developers, research funders and policymakers, representing 28 countries) identified 183 unanswered research questions. These were categorized into 15 research categories. A total of 175 participants prioritized categories and questions in the second survey phase, with ‘electronic cigarettes’; ‘addressing inequalities’; and ‘mental health and other substance abuse’ prioritized as the top three categories. Forty‐three stakeholders attended the workshop and discussed reasons for and against category prioritization. Prioritized research categories largely mirrored those in the survey stage, although ‘treatment delivery’ also emerged as a key category. Five cross‐cutting themes emerged: efficacy; relative efficacy; cost effectiveness; addressing inequalities; and different types of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There are many unanswered questions in the field of tobacco control. Stakeholders highlighted electronic cigarettes, addressing inequalities and mental health and other substance abuse as key areas for further research, and efficacy, relative efficacy, cost‐effectiveness and use of non‐randomized studies as important themes cutting across research areas. Future prioritization work would benefit from targeting non‐US and non‐UK stakeholders explicitly and from examining where priorities may differ based on stakeholder group. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-06 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5697669/ /pubmed/28879662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.13940 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Cochrane Updates
Lindson, Nicola
Richards‐Doran, Dan
Heath, Laura
Hartmann‐Boyce, Jamie
Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project
title Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project
title_full Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project
title_fullStr Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project
title_full_unstemmed Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project
title_short Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project
title_sort setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project
topic Cochrane Updates
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.13940
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsonnicola settingresearchprioritiesintobaccocontrolastakeholderengagementproject
AT richardsdorandan settingresearchprioritiesintobaccocontrolastakeholderengagementproject
AT heathlaura settingresearchprioritiesintobaccocontrolastakeholderengagementproject
AT hartmannboycejamie settingresearchprioritiesintobaccocontrolastakeholderengagementproject
AT settingresearchprioritiesintobaccocontrolastakeholderengagementproject