Cargando…
Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the western world. An effective screening program leading to early detection of disease would severely reduce the mortality of CRC. Alterations in the gut microbiota have been linked to CRC, but the potential of microbial mar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31011 |
_version_ | 1783280667024424960 |
---|---|
author | Eklöf, Vincy Löfgren‐Burström, Anna Zingmark, Carl Edin, Sofia Larsson, Pär Karling, Pontus Alexeyev, Oleg Rutegård, Jörgen Wikberg, Maria L. Palmqvist, Richard |
author_facet | Eklöf, Vincy Löfgren‐Burström, Anna Zingmark, Carl Edin, Sofia Larsson, Pär Karling, Pontus Alexeyev, Oleg Rutegård, Jörgen Wikberg, Maria L. Palmqvist, Richard |
author_sort | Eklöf, Vincy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the western world. An effective screening program leading to early detection of disease would severely reduce the mortality of CRC. Alterations in the gut microbiota have been linked to CRC, but the potential of microbial markers for use in CRC screening has been largely unstudied. We used a nested case–control study of 238 study subjects to explore the use of microbial markers for clbA+ bacteria harboring the pks pathogenicity island, afa‐C+ diffusely adherent Escherichia coli harboring the afa‐1 operon, and Fusobacterium nucleatum in stool as potential screening markers for CRC. We found that individual markers for clbA+ bacteria and F. nucleatum were more abundant in stool of patients with CRC, and could predict cancer with a relatively high specificity (81.5% and 76.9%, respectively) and with a sensitivity of 56.4% and 69.2%, respectively. In a combined test of clbA+ bacteria and F. nucleatum, CRC was detected with a specificity of 63.1% and a sensitivity of 84.6%. Our findings support a potential value of microbial factors in stool as putative noninvasive biomarkers for CRC detection. We propose that microbial markers may represent an important future screening strategy for CRC, selecting patients with a “high‐risk” microbial pattern to other further diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5697688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56976882017-11-28 Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection Eklöf, Vincy Löfgren‐Burström, Anna Zingmark, Carl Edin, Sofia Larsson, Pär Karling, Pontus Alexeyev, Oleg Rutegård, Jörgen Wikberg, Maria L. Palmqvist, Richard Int J Cancer Tumor Markers and Signatures Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the western world. An effective screening program leading to early detection of disease would severely reduce the mortality of CRC. Alterations in the gut microbiota have been linked to CRC, but the potential of microbial markers for use in CRC screening has been largely unstudied. We used a nested case–control study of 238 study subjects to explore the use of microbial markers for clbA+ bacteria harboring the pks pathogenicity island, afa‐C+ diffusely adherent Escherichia coli harboring the afa‐1 operon, and Fusobacterium nucleatum in stool as potential screening markers for CRC. We found that individual markers for clbA+ bacteria and F. nucleatum were more abundant in stool of patients with CRC, and could predict cancer with a relatively high specificity (81.5% and 76.9%, respectively) and with a sensitivity of 56.4% and 69.2%, respectively. In a combined test of clbA+ bacteria and F. nucleatum, CRC was detected with a specificity of 63.1% and a sensitivity of 84.6%. Our findings support a potential value of microbial factors in stool as putative noninvasive biomarkers for CRC detection. We propose that microbial markers may represent an important future screening strategy for CRC, selecting patients with a “high‐risk” microbial pattern to other further diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-06 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5697688/ /pubmed/28833079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31011 Text en © 2017 The Authors International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Tumor Markers and Signatures Eklöf, Vincy Löfgren‐Burström, Anna Zingmark, Carl Edin, Sofia Larsson, Pär Karling, Pontus Alexeyev, Oleg Rutegård, Jörgen Wikberg, Maria L. Palmqvist, Richard Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection |
title | Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection |
title_full | Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection |
title_fullStr | Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection |
title_short | Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection |
title_sort | cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection |
topic | Tumor Markers and Signatures |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eklofvincy cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection AT lofgrenburstromanna cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection AT zingmarkcarl cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection AT edinsofia cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection AT larssonpar cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection AT karlingpontus cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection AT alexeyevoleg cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection AT rutegardjorgen cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection AT wikbergmarial cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection AT palmqvistrichard cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection |