Cargando…

Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the western world. An effective screening program leading to early detection of disease would severely reduce the mortality of CRC. Alterations in the gut microbiota have been linked to CRC, but the potential of microbial mar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eklöf, Vincy, Löfgren‐Burström, Anna, Zingmark, Carl, Edin, Sofia, Larsson, Pär, Karling, Pontus, Alexeyev, Oleg, Rutegård, Jörgen, Wikberg, Maria L., Palmqvist, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31011
_version_ 1783280667024424960
author Eklöf, Vincy
Löfgren‐Burström, Anna
Zingmark, Carl
Edin, Sofia
Larsson, Pär
Karling, Pontus
Alexeyev, Oleg
Rutegård, Jörgen
Wikberg, Maria L.
Palmqvist, Richard
author_facet Eklöf, Vincy
Löfgren‐Burström, Anna
Zingmark, Carl
Edin, Sofia
Larsson, Pär
Karling, Pontus
Alexeyev, Oleg
Rutegård, Jörgen
Wikberg, Maria L.
Palmqvist, Richard
author_sort Eklöf, Vincy
collection PubMed
description Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the western world. An effective screening program leading to early detection of disease would severely reduce the mortality of CRC. Alterations in the gut microbiota have been linked to CRC, but the potential of microbial markers for use in CRC screening has been largely unstudied. We used a nested case–control study of 238 study subjects to explore the use of microbial markers for clbA+ bacteria harboring the pks pathogenicity island, afa‐C+ diffusely adherent Escherichia coli harboring the afa‐1 operon, and Fusobacterium nucleatum in stool as potential screening markers for CRC. We found that individual markers for clbA+ bacteria and F. nucleatum were more abundant in stool of patients with CRC, and could predict cancer with a relatively high specificity (81.5% and 76.9%, respectively) and with a sensitivity of 56.4% and 69.2%, respectively. In a combined test of clbA+ bacteria and F. nucleatum, CRC was detected with a specificity of 63.1% and a sensitivity of 84.6%. Our findings support a potential value of microbial factors in stool as putative noninvasive biomarkers for CRC detection. We propose that microbial markers may represent an important future screening strategy for CRC, selecting patients with a “high‐risk” microbial pattern to other further diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56976882017-11-28 Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection Eklöf, Vincy Löfgren‐Burström, Anna Zingmark, Carl Edin, Sofia Larsson, Pär Karling, Pontus Alexeyev, Oleg Rutegård, Jörgen Wikberg, Maria L. Palmqvist, Richard Int J Cancer Tumor Markers and Signatures Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in the western world. An effective screening program leading to early detection of disease would severely reduce the mortality of CRC. Alterations in the gut microbiota have been linked to CRC, but the potential of microbial markers for use in CRC screening has been largely unstudied. We used a nested case–control study of 238 study subjects to explore the use of microbial markers for clbA+ bacteria harboring the pks pathogenicity island, afa‐C+ diffusely adherent Escherichia coli harboring the afa‐1 operon, and Fusobacterium nucleatum in stool as potential screening markers for CRC. We found that individual markers for clbA+ bacteria and F. nucleatum were more abundant in stool of patients with CRC, and could predict cancer with a relatively high specificity (81.5% and 76.9%, respectively) and with a sensitivity of 56.4% and 69.2%, respectively. In a combined test of clbA+ bacteria and F. nucleatum, CRC was detected with a specificity of 63.1% and a sensitivity of 84.6%. Our findings support a potential value of microbial factors in stool as putative noninvasive biomarkers for CRC detection. We propose that microbial markers may represent an important future screening strategy for CRC, selecting patients with a “high‐risk” microbial pattern to other further diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-06 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5697688/ /pubmed/28833079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31011 Text en © 2017 The Authors International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Tumor Markers and Signatures
Eklöf, Vincy
Löfgren‐Burström, Anna
Zingmark, Carl
Edin, Sofia
Larsson, Pär
Karling, Pontus
Alexeyev, Oleg
Rutegård, Jörgen
Wikberg, Maria L.
Palmqvist, Richard
Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection
title Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection
title_full Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection
title_fullStr Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection
title_full_unstemmed Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection
title_short Cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection
title_sort cancer‐associated fecal microbial markers in colorectal cancer detection
topic Tumor Markers and Signatures
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28833079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31011
work_keys_str_mv AT eklofvincy cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection
AT lofgrenburstromanna cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection
AT zingmarkcarl cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection
AT edinsofia cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection
AT larssonpar cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection
AT karlingpontus cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection
AT alexeyevoleg cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection
AT rutegardjorgen cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection
AT wikbergmarial cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection
AT palmqvistrichard cancerassociatedfecalmicrobialmarkersincolorectalcancerdetection