Cargando…

Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for en bloc resection of superficial colorectal neoplasms to ensure accurate histologic diagnoses. However, colorectal ESD is associated with a high frequency of adverse events (AEs). We aimed to investigate the effectivene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harada, Hideaki, Suehiro, Satoshi, Murakami, Daisuke, Nakahara, Ryotaro, Ujihara, Tetsuro, Shimizu, Takanori, Miyama, Yasunaga, Katsuyama, Yasushi, Hayasaka, Kenji, Tounou, Shigetaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118743
_version_ 1783280710927253504
author Harada, Hideaki
Suehiro, Satoshi
Murakami, Daisuke
Nakahara, Ryotaro
Ujihara, Tetsuro
Shimizu, Takanori
Miyama, Yasunaga
Katsuyama, Yasushi
Hayasaka, Kenji
Tounou, Shigetaka
author_facet Harada, Hideaki
Suehiro, Satoshi
Murakami, Daisuke
Nakahara, Ryotaro
Ujihara, Tetsuro
Shimizu, Takanori
Miyama, Yasunaga
Katsuyama, Yasushi
Hayasaka, Kenji
Tounou, Shigetaka
author_sort Harada, Hideaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for en bloc resection of superficial colorectal neoplasms to ensure accurate histologic diagnoses. However, colorectal ESD is associated with a high frequency of adverse events (AEs). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of prophylactic clip closure (PCC) of mucosal defects for AEs after colorectal ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  This study included 197 patients with 211 lesions who underwent colorectal ESD between June 2010 and August 2016. Patients who had delayed perforation, delayed bleeding, abdominal pain, or fever were defined as AEs after colorectal ESD. Complete PCC was defined as completely sutured mucosal defect using endoclips following colorectal ESD, whereas incomplete PCC was defined as the mucosal defects that did not enable PCC or were partially sutured. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed and clinical outcomes evaluated. RESULTS : AEs occurred in 29 lesions (13.7 %), including 12 with delayed bleeding, 12 with fever, 2 with abdominal pain, 2 with fever and abdominal pain, and 1 with delayed bleeding and fever. Delayed perforation was not observed in any patient. The frequency of AEs was significantly lower in the group with complete PCC than in the group with incomplete PCC (7.3 % [9/123] vs. 22.7 % [20/88]; P  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that AEs after colorectal ESD were significantly associated with tumor size and submucosal fibrosis. Subgroup analysis among the resected specimen size of < 40 mm revealed that there was no significant difference in AEs between the 2 groups (5.6 % [6/107] vs. 17.8 % [8/45]; P  = 0.069). However, the frequency of fever with complete PCC was significantly lower than that with incomplete PCC (2.8 % [3/107] vs. 13.3 % [6/45]; P  = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS : Tumor size and submucosal fibrosis were independent risk factors for AEs after colorectal ESD. PCC may be effective in minimizing AEs after colorectal ESD, especially the frequency of fever.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5698008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56980082017-12-01 Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection Harada, Hideaki Suehiro, Satoshi Murakami, Daisuke Nakahara, Ryotaro Ujihara, Tetsuro Shimizu, Takanori Miyama, Yasunaga Katsuyama, Yasushi Hayasaka, Kenji Tounou, Shigetaka Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for en bloc resection of superficial colorectal neoplasms to ensure accurate histologic diagnoses. However, colorectal ESD is associated with a high frequency of adverse events (AEs). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of prophylactic clip closure (PCC) of mucosal defects for AEs after colorectal ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  This study included 197 patients with 211 lesions who underwent colorectal ESD between June 2010 and August 2016. Patients who had delayed perforation, delayed bleeding, abdominal pain, or fever were defined as AEs after colorectal ESD. Complete PCC was defined as completely sutured mucosal defect using endoclips following colorectal ESD, whereas incomplete PCC was defined as the mucosal defects that did not enable PCC or were partially sutured. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed and clinical outcomes evaluated. RESULTS : AEs occurred in 29 lesions (13.7 %), including 12 with delayed bleeding, 12 with fever, 2 with abdominal pain, 2 with fever and abdominal pain, and 1 with delayed bleeding and fever. Delayed perforation was not observed in any patient. The frequency of AEs was significantly lower in the group with complete PCC than in the group with incomplete PCC (7.3 % [9/123] vs. 22.7 % [20/88]; P  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that AEs after colorectal ESD were significantly associated with tumor size and submucosal fibrosis. Subgroup analysis among the resected specimen size of < 40 mm revealed that there was no significant difference in AEs between the 2 groups (5.6 % [6/107] vs. 17.8 % [8/45]; P  = 0.069). However, the frequency of fever with complete PCC was significantly lower than that with incomplete PCC (2.8 % [3/107] vs. 13.3 % [6/45]; P  = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS : Tumor size and submucosal fibrosis were independent risk factors for AEs after colorectal ESD. PCC may be effective in minimizing AEs after colorectal ESD, especially the frequency of fever. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-12 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5698008/ /pubmed/29201999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118743 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Harada, Hideaki
Suehiro, Satoshi
Murakami, Daisuke
Nakahara, Ryotaro
Ujihara, Tetsuro
Shimizu, Takanori
Miyama, Yasunaga
Katsuyama, Yasushi
Hayasaka, Kenji
Tounou, Shigetaka
Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_full Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_fullStr Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_short Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_sort clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118743
work_keys_str_mv AT haradahideaki clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT suehirosatoshi clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT murakamidaisuke clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT nakahararyotaro clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT ujiharatetsuro clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT shimizutakanori clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT miyamayasunaga clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT katsuyamayasushi clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT hayasakakenji clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT tounoushigetaka clinicalimpactofprophylacticclipclosureofmucosaldefectsaftercolorectalendoscopicsubmucosaldissection