Cargando…

No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how different techniques of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction affect subjective knee function via the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluation 2 years after surgery. It was hypothesized that the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamrin Senorski, Eric, Sundemo, David, Murawski, Christopher D., Alentorn-Geli, Eduard, Musahl, Volker, Fu, Freddie, Desai, Neel, Stålman, Anders, Samuelsson, Kristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28314886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4521-y
_version_ 1783280745615196160
author Hamrin Senorski, Eric
Sundemo, David
Murawski, Christopher D.
Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
Musahl, Volker
Fu, Freddie
Desai, Neel
Stålman, Anders
Samuelsson, Kristian
author_facet Hamrin Senorski, Eric
Sundemo, David
Murawski, Christopher D.
Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
Musahl, Volker
Fu, Freddie
Desai, Neel
Stålman, Anders
Samuelsson, Kristian
author_sort Hamrin Senorski, Eric
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how different techniques of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction affect subjective knee function via the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluation 2 years after surgery. It was hypothesized that the surgical techniques of single-bundle ACL reconstruction would result in equivalent results with respect to subjective knee function 2 years after surgery. METHODS: This cohort study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register during the 10-year period of 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2014. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings tendon autograft were included. Details on surgical technique were collected using a web-based questionnaire comprised of essential AARSC items, including utilization of accessory medial portal drilling, anatomic tunnel placement, and visualization of insertion sites and landmarks. A repeated measures ANOVA and an additional linear mixed model analysis were used to investigate the effect of surgical technique on the KOOS(4) from the pre-operative period to 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 13,636 patients who had undergone single-bundle ACL reconstruction comprised the study group for this analysis. A repeated measures ANOVA determined that mean subjective knee function differed between the pre-operative time period and at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.001). No differences were found with respect to the interaction between KOOS(4) and surgical technique or gender. Additionally, the linear mixed model adjusted for age at reconstruction, gender, and concomitant injuries showed no difference between surgical techniques in KOOS(4) improvement from baseline to 2-year follow-up. However, KOOS(4) improved significantly in patients for all surgical techniques of single-bundle ACL reconstruction (p < 0.001); the largest improvement was seen between the pre-operative time period and at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Surgical techniques of primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not demonstrate differences in the improvement in baseline subjective knee function as measured with the KOOS(4) during the first 2 years after surgery. However, subjective knee function improved from pre-operative baseline to 2-year follow-up independently of surgical technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4521-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5698359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56983592017-12-04 No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Hamrin Senorski, Eric Sundemo, David Murawski, Christopher D. Alentorn-Geli, Eduard Musahl, Volker Fu, Freddie Desai, Neel Stålman, Anders Samuelsson, Kristian Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how different techniques of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction affect subjective knee function via the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluation 2 years after surgery. It was hypothesized that the surgical techniques of single-bundle ACL reconstruction would result in equivalent results with respect to subjective knee function 2 years after surgery. METHODS: This cohort study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register during the 10-year period of 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2014. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings tendon autograft were included. Details on surgical technique were collected using a web-based questionnaire comprised of essential AARSC items, including utilization of accessory medial portal drilling, anatomic tunnel placement, and visualization of insertion sites and landmarks. A repeated measures ANOVA and an additional linear mixed model analysis were used to investigate the effect of surgical technique on the KOOS(4) from the pre-operative period to 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 13,636 patients who had undergone single-bundle ACL reconstruction comprised the study group for this analysis. A repeated measures ANOVA determined that mean subjective knee function differed between the pre-operative time period and at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.001). No differences were found with respect to the interaction between KOOS(4) and surgical technique or gender. Additionally, the linear mixed model adjusted for age at reconstruction, gender, and concomitant injuries showed no difference between surgical techniques in KOOS(4) improvement from baseline to 2-year follow-up. However, KOOS(4) improved significantly in patients for all surgical techniques of single-bundle ACL reconstruction (p < 0.001); the largest improvement was seen between the pre-operative time period and at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Surgical techniques of primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not demonstrate differences in the improvement in baseline subjective knee function as measured with the KOOS(4) during the first 2 years after surgery. However, subjective knee function improved from pre-operative baseline to 2-year follow-up independently of surgical technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4521-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-03-17 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5698359/ /pubmed/28314886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4521-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Knee
Hamrin Senorski, Eric
Sundemo, David
Murawski, Christopher D.
Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
Musahl, Volker
Fu, Freddie
Desai, Neel
Stålman, Anders
Samuelsson, Kristian
No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register
title No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register
title_full No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register
title_fullStr No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register
title_full_unstemmed No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register
title_short No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register
title_sort no differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the swedish national knee ligament register
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28314886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4521-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hamrinsenorskieric nodifferencesinsubjectivekneefunctionbetweensurgicaltechniquesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionat2yearfollowupacohortstudyfromtheswedishnationalkneeligamentregister
AT sundemodavid nodifferencesinsubjectivekneefunctionbetweensurgicaltechniquesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionat2yearfollowupacohortstudyfromtheswedishnationalkneeligamentregister
AT murawskichristopherd nodifferencesinsubjectivekneefunctionbetweensurgicaltechniquesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionat2yearfollowupacohortstudyfromtheswedishnationalkneeligamentregister
AT alentorngelieduard nodifferencesinsubjectivekneefunctionbetweensurgicaltechniquesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionat2yearfollowupacohortstudyfromtheswedishnationalkneeligamentregister
AT musahlvolker nodifferencesinsubjectivekneefunctionbetweensurgicaltechniquesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionat2yearfollowupacohortstudyfromtheswedishnationalkneeligamentregister
AT fufreddie nodifferencesinsubjectivekneefunctionbetweensurgicaltechniquesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionat2yearfollowupacohortstudyfromtheswedishnationalkneeligamentregister
AT desaineel nodifferencesinsubjectivekneefunctionbetweensurgicaltechniquesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionat2yearfollowupacohortstudyfromtheswedishnationalkneeligamentregister
AT stalmananders nodifferencesinsubjectivekneefunctionbetweensurgicaltechniquesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionat2yearfollowupacohortstudyfromtheswedishnationalkneeligamentregister
AT samuelssonkristian nodifferencesinsubjectivekneefunctionbetweensurgicaltechniquesofanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionat2yearfollowupacohortstudyfromtheswedishnationalkneeligamentregister