Cargando…

Clinical feasibility and validation of 3D principal strain analysis from cine MRI: comparison to 2D strain by MRI and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography

Two-dimensional (2D) strain analysis is constrained by geometry-dependent reference directions of deformation (i.e. radial, circumferential, and longitudinal) following the assumption of cylindrical chamber architecture. Three-dimensional (3D) principal strain analysis may overcome such limitations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satriano, Alessandro, Heydari, Bobak, Narous, Mariam, Exner, Derek V., Mikami, Yoko, Attwood, Monica M., Tyberg, John V., Lydell, Carmen P., Howarth, Andrew G., Fine, Nowell M., White, James A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28685315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1199-7
_version_ 1783280749868220416
author Satriano, Alessandro
Heydari, Bobak
Narous, Mariam
Exner, Derek V.
Mikami, Yoko
Attwood, Monica M.
Tyberg, John V.
Lydell, Carmen P.
Howarth, Andrew G.
Fine, Nowell M.
White, James A.
author_facet Satriano, Alessandro
Heydari, Bobak
Narous, Mariam
Exner, Derek V.
Mikami, Yoko
Attwood, Monica M.
Tyberg, John V.
Lydell, Carmen P.
Howarth, Andrew G.
Fine, Nowell M.
White, James A.
author_sort Satriano, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description Two-dimensional (2D) strain analysis is constrained by geometry-dependent reference directions of deformation (i.e. radial, circumferential, and longitudinal) following the assumption of cylindrical chamber architecture. Three-dimensional (3D) principal strain analysis may overcome such limitations by referencing intrinsic (i.e. principal) directions of deformation. This study aimed to demonstrate clinical feasibility of 3D principal strain analysis from routine 2D cine MRI with validation to strain from 2D tagged cine analysis and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography. Thirty-one patients undergoing cardiac MRI were studied. 3D strain was measured from routine, multi-planar 2D cine SSFP images using custom software designed to apply 4D deformation fields to 3D cardiac models to derive principal strain. Comparisons of strain estimates versus those by 2D tagged cine, 2D non-tagged cine (feature tracking), and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) were performed. Mean age was 51 ± 14 (36% female). Mean LV ejection fraction was 66 ± 10% (range 37–80%). 3D principal strain analysis was feasible in all subjects and showed high inter- and intra-observer reproducibility (ICC range 0.83–0.97 and 0.83–0.98, respectively—p < 0.001 for all directions). Strong correlations of minimum and maximum principal strain were respectively observed versus the following: 3D STE estimates of longitudinal (r = 0.81 and r = −0.64), circumferential (r = 0.76 and r = −0.58) and radial (r = −0.80 and r = 0.63) strain (p < 0.001 for all); 2D tagged cine estimates of longitudinal (r = 0.81 and r = −0.81), circumferential (r = 0.87 and r = −0.85), and radial (r = −0.76 and r = 0.81) strain (p < 0.0001 for all); and 2D cine (feature tracking) estimates of longitudinal (r = 0.85 and −0.83), circumferential (r = 0.88 and r = −0.87), and radial strain (r = −0.79 and r = 0.84, p < 0.0001 for all). 3D principal strain analysis is feasible using routine, multi-planar 2D cine MRI and shows high reproducibility with strong correlations to 2D conventional strain analysis and 3D STE-based analysis. Given its independence from geometry-related directions of deformation this technique may offer unique benefit for the detection and prognostication of myocardial disease, and warrants expanded investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1199-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5698377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56983772017-12-04 Clinical feasibility and validation of 3D principal strain analysis from cine MRI: comparison to 2D strain by MRI and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography Satriano, Alessandro Heydari, Bobak Narous, Mariam Exner, Derek V. Mikami, Yoko Attwood, Monica M. Tyberg, John V. Lydell, Carmen P. Howarth, Andrew G. Fine, Nowell M. White, James A. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Two-dimensional (2D) strain analysis is constrained by geometry-dependent reference directions of deformation (i.e. radial, circumferential, and longitudinal) following the assumption of cylindrical chamber architecture. Three-dimensional (3D) principal strain analysis may overcome such limitations by referencing intrinsic (i.e. principal) directions of deformation. This study aimed to demonstrate clinical feasibility of 3D principal strain analysis from routine 2D cine MRI with validation to strain from 2D tagged cine analysis and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography. Thirty-one patients undergoing cardiac MRI were studied. 3D strain was measured from routine, multi-planar 2D cine SSFP images using custom software designed to apply 4D deformation fields to 3D cardiac models to derive principal strain. Comparisons of strain estimates versus those by 2D tagged cine, 2D non-tagged cine (feature tracking), and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) were performed. Mean age was 51 ± 14 (36% female). Mean LV ejection fraction was 66 ± 10% (range 37–80%). 3D principal strain analysis was feasible in all subjects and showed high inter- and intra-observer reproducibility (ICC range 0.83–0.97 and 0.83–0.98, respectively—p < 0.001 for all directions). Strong correlations of minimum and maximum principal strain were respectively observed versus the following: 3D STE estimates of longitudinal (r = 0.81 and r = −0.64), circumferential (r = 0.76 and r = −0.58) and radial (r = −0.80 and r = 0.63) strain (p < 0.001 for all); 2D tagged cine estimates of longitudinal (r = 0.81 and r = −0.81), circumferential (r = 0.87 and r = −0.85), and radial (r = −0.76 and r = 0.81) strain (p < 0.0001 for all); and 2D cine (feature tracking) estimates of longitudinal (r = 0.85 and −0.83), circumferential (r = 0.88 and r = −0.87), and radial strain (r = −0.79 and r = 0.84, p < 0.0001 for all). 3D principal strain analysis is feasible using routine, multi-planar 2D cine MRI and shows high reproducibility with strong correlations to 2D conventional strain analysis and 3D STE-based analysis. Given its independence from geometry-related directions of deformation this technique may offer unique benefit for the detection and prognostication of myocardial disease, and warrants expanded investigation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-017-1199-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2017-07-06 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5698377/ /pubmed/28685315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1199-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Satriano, Alessandro
Heydari, Bobak
Narous, Mariam
Exner, Derek V.
Mikami, Yoko
Attwood, Monica M.
Tyberg, John V.
Lydell, Carmen P.
Howarth, Andrew G.
Fine, Nowell M.
White, James A.
Clinical feasibility and validation of 3D principal strain analysis from cine MRI: comparison to 2D strain by MRI and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography
title Clinical feasibility and validation of 3D principal strain analysis from cine MRI: comparison to 2D strain by MRI and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_full Clinical feasibility and validation of 3D principal strain analysis from cine MRI: comparison to 2D strain by MRI and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_fullStr Clinical feasibility and validation of 3D principal strain analysis from cine MRI: comparison to 2D strain by MRI and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Clinical feasibility and validation of 3D principal strain analysis from cine MRI: comparison to 2D strain by MRI and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_short Clinical feasibility and validation of 3D principal strain analysis from cine MRI: comparison to 2D strain by MRI and 3D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_sort clinical feasibility and validation of 3d principal strain analysis from cine mri: comparison to 2d strain by mri and 3d speckle tracking echocardiography
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28685315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1199-7
work_keys_str_mv AT satrianoalessandro clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT heydaribobak clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT narousmariam clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT exnerderekv clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT mikamiyoko clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT attwoodmonicam clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT tybergjohnv clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT lydellcarmenp clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT howarthandrewg clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT finenowellm clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT whitejamesa clinicalfeasibilityandvalidationof3dprincipalstrainanalysisfromcinemricomparisonto2dstrainbymriand3dspeckletrackingechocardiography