Cargando…

Surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction

BACKGROUND: Methanol to dimethyl ether (MTD) is considered one of the main routes for the production of clean bio‐fuel. The effect of copper loading on the catalytic performance of different phases of alumina that formed by calcination at two different temperatures was examined for the dehydration o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osman, Ahmed I, Abu‐Dahrieh, Jehad K, Rooney, David W, Thompson, Jillian, Halawy, Samih A, Mohamed, Mohamed A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29200585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5371
_version_ 1783280817301094400
author Osman, Ahmed I
Abu‐Dahrieh, Jehad K
Rooney, David W
Thompson, Jillian
Halawy, Samih A
Mohamed, Mohamed A
author_facet Osman, Ahmed I
Abu‐Dahrieh, Jehad K
Rooney, David W
Thompson, Jillian
Halawy, Samih A
Mohamed, Mohamed A
author_sort Osman, Ahmed I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methanol to dimethyl ether (MTD) is considered one of the main routes for the production of clean bio‐fuel. The effect of copper loading on the catalytic performance of different phases of alumina that formed by calcination at two different temperatures was examined for the dehydration of methanol to dimethyl ether (DME). RESULTS: A range of Cu loadings of (1, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 15% Cu wt/wt) on Al(2)O(3) calcined at 350 and 550 °C were prepared and characterized by TGA, XRD, BET, NH(3)‐TPD, TEM, H(2)‐TPR, SEM, EDX, XPS and DRIFT‐Pyridine techniques. The prepared catalysts were used in a fixed bed reactor under reaction conditions in which the temperature ranged from 180–300 °C with weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) = 12.1 h(‐1). It was observed that all catalysts calcined at 550 °C (γ‐Al(2)O(3) support phase) exhibited higher activity than those calcined at 350 °C (γ‐AlOOH), and this is due to the phase support change. Furthermore, the optimum Cu loading was found to be 6% Cu/γ‐Al(2)O(3) with this catalyst also showing a high degree of stability under steady state conditions and this is attributed to the enhancement in surface acidity and hydrophobicity. CONCLUSION: The addition of copper to the support improved the catalyst properties and activity. For all the copper modified catalysts, the optimum catalyst with high degree of activity and stability was 6% copper loaded on gamma alumina. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5698741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56987412017-11-30 Surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction Osman, Ahmed I Abu‐Dahrieh, Jehad K Rooney, David W Thompson, Jillian Halawy, Samih A Mohamed, Mohamed A J Chem Technol Biotechnol Research Articles BACKGROUND: Methanol to dimethyl ether (MTD) is considered one of the main routes for the production of clean bio‐fuel. The effect of copper loading on the catalytic performance of different phases of alumina that formed by calcination at two different temperatures was examined for the dehydration of methanol to dimethyl ether (DME). RESULTS: A range of Cu loadings of (1, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 15% Cu wt/wt) on Al(2)O(3) calcined at 350 and 550 °C were prepared and characterized by TGA, XRD, BET, NH(3)‐TPD, TEM, H(2)‐TPR, SEM, EDX, XPS and DRIFT‐Pyridine techniques. The prepared catalysts were used in a fixed bed reactor under reaction conditions in which the temperature ranged from 180–300 °C with weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) = 12.1 h(‐1). It was observed that all catalysts calcined at 550 °C (γ‐Al(2)O(3) support phase) exhibited higher activity than those calcined at 350 °C (γ‐AlOOH), and this is due to the phase support change. Furthermore, the optimum Cu loading was found to be 6% Cu/γ‐Al(2)O(3) with this catalyst also showing a high degree of stability under steady state conditions and this is attributed to the enhancement in surface acidity and hydrophobicity. CONCLUSION: The addition of copper to the support improved the catalyst properties and activity. For all the copper modified catalysts, the optimum catalyst with high degree of activity and stability was 6% copper loaded on gamma alumina. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017-09-08 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5698741/ /pubmed/29200585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5371 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Osman, Ahmed I
Abu‐Dahrieh, Jehad K
Rooney, David W
Thompson, Jillian
Halawy, Samih A
Mohamed, Mohamed A
Surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction
title Surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction
title_full Surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction
title_fullStr Surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction
title_full_unstemmed Surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction
title_short Surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction
title_sort surface hydrophobicity and acidity effect on alumina catalyst in catalytic methanol dehydration reaction
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29200585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5371
work_keys_str_mv AT osmanahmedi surfacehydrophobicityandacidityeffectonaluminacatalystincatalyticmethanoldehydrationreaction
AT abudahriehjehadk surfacehydrophobicityandacidityeffectonaluminacatalystincatalyticmethanoldehydrationreaction
AT rooneydavidw surfacehydrophobicityandacidityeffectonaluminacatalystincatalyticmethanoldehydrationreaction
AT thompsonjillian surfacehydrophobicityandacidityeffectonaluminacatalystincatalyticmethanoldehydrationreaction
AT halawysamiha surfacehydrophobicityandacidityeffectonaluminacatalystincatalyticmethanoldehydrationreaction
AT mohamedmohameda surfacehydrophobicityandacidityeffectonaluminacatalystincatalyticmethanoldehydrationreaction