Cargando…
Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures
BACKGROUND: The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ is an innovative electrosurgical device that uses a novel technology to cut tissues. It has been proven to be safe and feasible in ear, nose, and throat surgery, but there are only limited data concerning the use of PlasmaBlade™ ins...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0292-7 |
_version_ | 1783280859137179648 |
---|---|
author | Kaya, Elif Totzeck, Matthias Rassaf, Tienush |
author_facet | Kaya, Elif Totzeck, Matthias Rassaf, Tienush |
author_sort | Kaya, Elif |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ is an innovative electrosurgical device that uses a novel technology to cut tissues. It has been proven to be safe and feasible in ear, nose, and throat surgery, but there are only limited data concerning the use of PlasmaBlade™ instead of conventional electrocautery in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures except for generator replacements. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study with patients undergoing CIED surgery at our center between December 2015 and March 2017 and evaluate the feasibility and the clinical outcome of the PlasmaBlade™. RESULTS: 282 patients (mean age 70.7 ± 12.9 years; 65.6% male) were included, of which 119 (42.2%) underwent pacemaker implantation, 95 (33.7%) implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, and 68 (24.1%) received a generator replacement. At the time of the procedure, 55 patients (19.5%) were on dual antiplatelet therapy, and 109 (38.7%) patients were on oral anticoagulation (30.5% vitamin K antagonists, 8.2% novel oral anticoagulants). The overall perioperative complication rate was 3.9%. Device-pocket hematoma occurred in 9 patients (3.2%) requiring further surgery. No lead damage was seen within a follow-up of 6 months. One patient presented with device-pocket infection 2.9 months after implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator requiring CIED system extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing conventional electrocautery by PlasmaBlade™ for CIED procedures is feasible with a moderate rate of perioperative complications compared to the literature. Studies comparing the PlasmaBlade™ with conventional electrocautery are necessary to investigate whether PlasmaBlade™ offers an additional benefit over conventional electrocautery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5698956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56989562017-12-01 Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures Kaya, Elif Totzeck, Matthias Rassaf, Tienush Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ is an innovative electrosurgical device that uses a novel technology to cut tissues. It has been proven to be safe and feasible in ear, nose, and throat surgery, but there are only limited data concerning the use of PlasmaBlade™ instead of conventional electrocautery in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures except for generator replacements. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study with patients undergoing CIED surgery at our center between December 2015 and March 2017 and evaluate the feasibility and the clinical outcome of the PlasmaBlade™. RESULTS: 282 patients (mean age 70.7 ± 12.9 years; 65.6% male) were included, of which 119 (42.2%) underwent pacemaker implantation, 95 (33.7%) implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, and 68 (24.1%) received a generator replacement. At the time of the procedure, 55 patients (19.5%) were on dual antiplatelet therapy, and 109 (38.7%) patients were on oral anticoagulation (30.5% vitamin K antagonists, 8.2% novel oral anticoagulants). The overall perioperative complication rate was 3.9%. Device-pocket hematoma occurred in 9 patients (3.2%) requiring further surgery. No lead damage was seen within a follow-up of 6 months. One patient presented with device-pocket infection 2.9 months after implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator requiring CIED system extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing conventional electrocautery by PlasmaBlade™ for CIED procedures is feasible with a moderate rate of perioperative complications compared to the literature. Studies comparing the PlasmaBlade™ with conventional electrocautery are necessary to investigate whether PlasmaBlade™ offers an additional benefit over conventional electrocautery. BioMed Central 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5698956/ /pubmed/29162159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0292-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kaya, Elif Totzeck, Matthias Rassaf, Tienush Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures |
title | Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures |
title_full | Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures |
title_fullStr | Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures |
title_short | Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures |
title_sort | pulsed electron avalanche knife (peak) plasmablade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0292-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kayaelif pulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpacemakeranddefibrillatorprocedures AT totzeckmatthias pulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpacemakeranddefibrillatorprocedures AT rassaftienush pulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpacemakeranddefibrillatorprocedures |