Cargando…

Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures

BACKGROUND: The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ is an innovative electrosurgical device that uses a novel technology to cut tissues. It has been proven to be safe and feasible in ear, nose, and throat surgery, but there are only limited data concerning the use of PlasmaBlade™ ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaya, Elif, Totzeck, Matthias, Rassaf, Tienush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0292-7
_version_ 1783280859137179648
author Kaya, Elif
Totzeck, Matthias
Rassaf, Tienush
author_facet Kaya, Elif
Totzeck, Matthias
Rassaf, Tienush
author_sort Kaya, Elif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ is an innovative electrosurgical device that uses a novel technology to cut tissues. It has been proven to be safe and feasible in ear, nose, and throat surgery, but there are only limited data concerning the use of PlasmaBlade™ instead of conventional electrocautery in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures except for generator replacements. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study with patients undergoing CIED surgery at our center between December 2015 and March 2017 and evaluate the feasibility and the clinical outcome of the PlasmaBlade™. RESULTS: 282 patients (mean age 70.7 ±  12.9 years; 65.6% male) were included, of which 119 (42.2%) underwent pacemaker implantation, 95 (33.7%) implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, and 68 (24.1%) received a generator replacement. At the time of the procedure, 55 patients (19.5%) were on dual antiplatelet therapy, and 109 (38.7%) patients were on oral anticoagulation (30.5% vitamin K antagonists, 8.2% novel oral anticoagulants). The overall perioperative complication rate was 3.9%. Device-pocket hematoma occurred in 9 patients (3.2%) requiring further surgery. No lead damage was seen within a follow-up of 6 months. One patient presented with device-pocket infection 2.9 months after implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator requiring CIED system extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing conventional electrocautery by PlasmaBlade™ for CIED procedures is feasible with a moderate rate of perioperative complications compared to the literature. Studies comparing the PlasmaBlade™ with conventional electrocautery are necessary to investigate whether PlasmaBlade™ offers an additional benefit over conventional electrocautery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5698956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56989562017-12-01 Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures Kaya, Elif Totzeck, Matthias Rassaf, Tienush Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ is an innovative electrosurgical device that uses a novel technology to cut tissues. It has been proven to be safe and feasible in ear, nose, and throat surgery, but there are only limited data concerning the use of PlasmaBlade™ instead of conventional electrocautery in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures except for generator replacements. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study with patients undergoing CIED surgery at our center between December 2015 and March 2017 and evaluate the feasibility and the clinical outcome of the PlasmaBlade™. RESULTS: 282 patients (mean age 70.7 ±  12.9 years; 65.6% male) were included, of which 119 (42.2%) underwent pacemaker implantation, 95 (33.7%) implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, and 68 (24.1%) received a generator replacement. At the time of the procedure, 55 patients (19.5%) were on dual antiplatelet therapy, and 109 (38.7%) patients were on oral anticoagulation (30.5% vitamin K antagonists, 8.2% novel oral anticoagulants). The overall perioperative complication rate was 3.9%. Device-pocket hematoma occurred in 9 patients (3.2%) requiring further surgery. No lead damage was seen within a follow-up of 6 months. One patient presented with device-pocket infection 2.9 months after implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator requiring CIED system extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing conventional electrocautery by PlasmaBlade™ for CIED procedures is feasible with a moderate rate of perioperative complications compared to the literature. Studies comparing the PlasmaBlade™ with conventional electrocautery are necessary to investigate whether PlasmaBlade™ offers an additional benefit over conventional electrocautery. BioMed Central 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5698956/ /pubmed/29162159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0292-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kaya, Elif
Totzeck, Matthias
Rassaf, Tienush
Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures
title Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures
title_full Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures
title_fullStr Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures
title_short Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures
title_sort pulsed electron avalanche knife (peak) plasmablade™ in pacemaker and defibrillator procedures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0292-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kayaelif pulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpacemakeranddefibrillatorprocedures
AT totzeckmatthias pulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpacemakeranddefibrillatorprocedures
AT rassaftienush pulsedelectronavalancheknifepeakplasmabladeinpacemakeranddefibrillatorprocedures