Cargando…

Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England

BACKGROUND: There is an expectation in current heath care policy that family carers are involved in service delivery. This is also the case with compulsory outpatient mental health care, Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) that were introduced in England in 2008. No study has systematically investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rugkåsa, Jorun, Canvin, Krysia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2716-z
_version_ 1783280869496061952
author Rugkåsa, Jorun
Canvin, Krysia
author_facet Rugkåsa, Jorun
Canvin, Krysia
author_sort Rugkåsa, Jorun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an expectation in current heath care policy that family carers are involved in service delivery. This is also the case with compulsory outpatient mental health care, Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) that were introduced in England in 2008. No study has systematically investigated family involvement through the CTO process. METHOD: We conducted qualitative interviews with 24 family carers to ascertain their views and experiences of involvement in CTOs. The transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis that incorporated both deductive and inductive elements. RESULTS: We found significant variation in both the type and extent of family carer involvement throughout the CTO process (initiation, recall to hospital, renewal, tribunal hearings, discharge). Some were satisfied with their level of involvement while others felt (at least partly) excluded or that they wanted to be more involved. Some wanted less involvement than what they had. From the interviews we identified key factors shaping carers' involvement. These included: perceptions of patient preference; concern over the relationship to the patient; carers’ knowledge of the CTO and of the potential for carer involvement; access to and relationships with health professionals; issues of patient confidentiality; opportunities for private discussions, and; health professionals limiting involvement. These factors show that health professionals have many opportunities to facilitate, or hinder, carer involvement. The various roles attributed to carers, such ‘proxy’ for patient decision, ‘gatekeeper’ to services, ‘mother’ or ‘expert carer’, however, conflict with one another and make the overall role unclear. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for clarification of the expectations of carers in individual care situations, for carers to be equipped with the information they need to in order to be involved, and for services to find flexible and innovative ways of ensuring continuous, open communication. The introduction of CTOs in England has not been successful in its ambition for carer involvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2716-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5698997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56989972017-12-01 Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England Rugkåsa, Jorun Canvin, Krysia BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There is an expectation in current heath care policy that family carers are involved in service delivery. This is also the case with compulsory outpatient mental health care, Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) that were introduced in England in 2008. No study has systematically investigated family involvement through the CTO process. METHOD: We conducted qualitative interviews with 24 family carers to ascertain their views and experiences of involvement in CTOs. The transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis that incorporated both deductive and inductive elements. RESULTS: We found significant variation in both the type and extent of family carer involvement throughout the CTO process (initiation, recall to hospital, renewal, tribunal hearings, discharge). Some were satisfied with their level of involvement while others felt (at least partly) excluded or that they wanted to be more involved. Some wanted less involvement than what they had. From the interviews we identified key factors shaping carers' involvement. These included: perceptions of patient preference; concern over the relationship to the patient; carers’ knowledge of the CTO and of the potential for carer involvement; access to and relationships with health professionals; issues of patient confidentiality; opportunities for private discussions, and; health professionals limiting involvement. These factors show that health professionals have many opportunities to facilitate, or hinder, carer involvement. The various roles attributed to carers, such ‘proxy’ for patient decision, ‘gatekeeper’ to services, ‘mother’ or ‘expert carer’, however, conflict with one another and make the overall role unclear. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for clarification of the expectations of carers in individual care situations, for carers to be equipped with the information they need to in order to be involved, and for services to find flexible and innovative ways of ensuring continuous, open communication. The introduction of CTOs in England has not been successful in its ambition for carer involvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2716-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5698997/ /pubmed/29162096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2716-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rugkåsa, Jorun
Canvin, Krysia
Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England
title Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England
title_full Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England
title_fullStr Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England
title_full_unstemmed Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England
title_short Carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in England
title_sort carer involvement in compulsory out-patient psychiatric care in england
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5698997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2716-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rugkasajorun carerinvolvementincompulsoryoutpatientpsychiatriccareinengland
AT canvinkrysia carerinvolvementincompulsoryoutpatientpsychiatriccareinengland