Cargando…

Using ‘Active Signposting’ to streamline general practitioner workload in two London-based practices

General practice is at the forefront of the National Health Service, but is currently being overwhelmed by ever-increasing patient demand and financial constraints. Telephone consultations (TCs) have been used as a method to ease pressure on general practice. Many of these consultations are booked w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siddiqui, Faisal, Sidhu, Baljinder, Tahir, Mohammad Aumran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5699125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000146
_version_ 1783280886129623040
author Siddiqui, Faisal
Sidhu, Baljinder
Tahir, Mohammad Aumran
author_facet Siddiqui, Faisal
Sidhu, Baljinder
Tahir, Mohammad Aumran
author_sort Siddiqui, Faisal
collection PubMed
description General practice is at the forefront of the National Health Service, but is currently being overwhelmed by ever-increasing patient demand and financial constraints. Telephone consultations (TCs) have been used as a method to ease pressure on general practice. Many of these consultations are booked with general practioners (GPs), despite occasions when the patient could have either been signposted to self-help or offered an alternative service. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to evaluate the nature of TCs undertaken by GPs at our two practices; and whether the patients’ needs could have adequately been met without the involvement of a GP. Consultations where this was the case were deemed ‘possibly avoidable’, and those where involvement with a GP was the best option have been termed ‘essential’. A retrospective analysis was undertaken to establish a baseline figure for the proportion of possibly avoidable TCs in two practices. A new intervention was then introduced, with reception staff following a set of protocols when booking in patients. Patients who did not require a GP to deal with their query were actively signposted by reception staff to other allied healthcare professionals, non-medical staff or an alternative service at the time of booking their appointment. Two practices were involved in the study. After 2 Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles, the proportion of essential consultations taking place at both practices increased from 28.6% and 27.3% at baseline, to 82.6% and 71.4%, respectively. A lower number of possibly avoidable TCs equates to more time for essential TCs and greater value for money for the practice. Patient access to care is also improved, with patients directed to alternative and often quicker services which still meet their needs adequately. With the current system of primary care unable to cope with the demands it faces, interventions such as active signposting provide value for both GP practices and patients alike.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5699125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56991252018-02-15 Using ‘Active Signposting’ to streamline general practitioner workload in two London-based practices Siddiqui, Faisal Sidhu, Baljinder Tahir, Mohammad Aumran BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement Report General practice is at the forefront of the National Health Service, but is currently being overwhelmed by ever-increasing patient demand and financial constraints. Telephone consultations (TCs) have been used as a method to ease pressure on general practice. Many of these consultations are booked with general practioners (GPs), despite occasions when the patient could have either been signposted to self-help or offered an alternative service. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to evaluate the nature of TCs undertaken by GPs at our two practices; and whether the patients’ needs could have adequately been met without the involvement of a GP. Consultations where this was the case were deemed ‘possibly avoidable’, and those where involvement with a GP was the best option have been termed ‘essential’. A retrospective analysis was undertaken to establish a baseline figure for the proportion of possibly avoidable TCs in two practices. A new intervention was then introduced, with reception staff following a set of protocols when booking in patients. Patients who did not require a GP to deal with their query were actively signposted by reception staff to other allied healthcare professionals, non-medical staff or an alternative service at the time of booking their appointment. Two practices were involved in the study. After 2 Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles, the proportion of essential consultations taking place at both practices increased from 28.6% and 27.3% at baseline, to 82.6% and 71.4%, respectively. A lower number of possibly avoidable TCs equates to more time for essential TCs and greater value for money for the practice. Patient access to care is also improved, with patients directed to alternative and often quicker services which still meet their needs adequately. With the current system of primary care unable to cope with the demands it faces, interventions such as active signposting provide value for both GP practices and patients alike. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5699125/ /pubmed/29450292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000146 Text en © Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Report
Siddiqui, Faisal
Sidhu, Baljinder
Tahir, Mohammad Aumran
Using ‘Active Signposting’ to streamline general practitioner workload in two London-based practices
title Using ‘Active Signposting’ to streamline general practitioner workload in two London-based practices
title_full Using ‘Active Signposting’ to streamline general practitioner workload in two London-based practices
title_fullStr Using ‘Active Signposting’ to streamline general practitioner workload in two London-based practices
title_full_unstemmed Using ‘Active Signposting’ to streamline general practitioner workload in two London-based practices
title_short Using ‘Active Signposting’ to streamline general practitioner workload in two London-based practices
title_sort using ‘active signposting’ to streamline general practitioner workload in two london-based practices
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5699125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000146
work_keys_str_mv AT siddiquifaisal usingactivesignpostingtostreamlinegeneralpractitionerworkloadintwolondonbasedpractices
AT sidhubaljinder usingactivesignpostingtostreamlinegeneralpractitionerworkloadintwolondonbasedpractices
AT tahirmohammadaumran usingactivesignpostingtostreamlinegeneralpractitionerworkloadintwolondonbasedpractices