Cargando…

The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound

BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has created a need to develop assessment tools to ensure that learners can competently use these technologies. In this study, the authors developed and tested a rating scale to assess the quality of point-of-care thoracic ultrasound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Millington, Scott J., Arntfield, Robert T., Guo, Robert Jie, Koenig, Seth, Kory, Pierre, Noble, Vicki, Mallemat, Haney, Schoenherr, Jordan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0081-0
_version_ 1783281046837526528
author Millington, Scott J.
Arntfield, Robert T.
Guo, Robert Jie
Koenig, Seth
Kory, Pierre
Noble, Vicki
Mallemat, Haney
Schoenherr, Jordan R.
author_facet Millington, Scott J.
Arntfield, Robert T.
Guo, Robert Jie
Koenig, Seth
Kory, Pierre
Noble, Vicki
Mallemat, Haney
Schoenherr, Jordan R.
author_sort Millington, Scott J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has created a need to develop assessment tools to ensure that learners can competently use these technologies. In this study, the authors developed and tested a rating scale to assess the quality of point-of-care thoracic ultrasound studies performed by novices. In Phase 1, the Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale was developed based on structured interviews with subject matter experts. The tool was then piloted on a small series of ultrasound studies in Phase 2. In Phase 3 the tool was applied to a sample of 150 POCUS studies performed by ten learners; performance was then assessed by two independent raters. RESULTS: Evidence for the content validity of the ACTS scale was provided by a consensus exercise wherein experts agreed on the general principles and specific items that make up the scale. The tool demonstrated reasonable inter-rater reliability despite minimal requirements for evaluator training and displayed evidence of good internal structure, with related scale items correlating well with each other. Analysis of the aggregate learning curves suggested a rapid early improvement in learner performance with slower improvement after approximately 25–30 studies. CONCLUSIONS: The ACTS scale provides a straightforward means to assess learner performance. Our results support the conclusion that the tool is an effective means of making valid judgments regarding competency in point-of-care thoracic ultrasound, and that the majority of learner improvement occurs during their first 25–30 practice studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5700015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57000152017-12-04 The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound Millington, Scott J. Arntfield, Robert T. Guo, Robert Jie Koenig, Seth Kory, Pierre Noble, Vicki Mallemat, Haney Schoenherr, Jordan R. Crit Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has created a need to develop assessment tools to ensure that learners can competently use these technologies. In this study, the authors developed and tested a rating scale to assess the quality of point-of-care thoracic ultrasound studies performed by novices. In Phase 1, the Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale was developed based on structured interviews with subject matter experts. The tool was then piloted on a small series of ultrasound studies in Phase 2. In Phase 3 the tool was applied to a sample of 150 POCUS studies performed by ten learners; performance was then assessed by two independent raters. RESULTS: Evidence for the content validity of the ACTS scale was provided by a consensus exercise wherein experts agreed on the general principles and specific items that make up the scale. The tool demonstrated reasonable inter-rater reliability despite minimal requirements for evaluator training and displayed evidence of good internal structure, with related scale items correlating well with each other. Analysis of the aggregate learning curves suggested a rapid early improvement in learner performance with slower improvement after approximately 25–30 studies. CONCLUSIONS: The ACTS scale provides a straightforward means to assess learner performance. Our results support the conclusion that the tool is an effective means of making valid judgments regarding competency in point-of-care thoracic ultrasound, and that the majority of learner improvement occurs during their first 25–30 practice studies. Springer Milan 2017-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5700015/ /pubmed/29168030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0081-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Millington, Scott J.
Arntfield, Robert T.
Guo, Robert Jie
Koenig, Seth
Kory, Pierre
Noble, Vicki
Mallemat, Haney
Schoenherr, Jordan R.
The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound
title The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound
title_full The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound
title_fullStr The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound
title_short The Assessment of Competency in Thoracic Sonography (ACTS) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound
title_sort assessment of competency in thoracic sonography (acts) scale: validation of a tool for point-of-care ultrasound
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0081-0
work_keys_str_mv AT millingtonscottj theassessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT arntfieldrobertt theassessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT guorobertjie theassessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT koenigseth theassessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT korypierre theassessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT noblevicki theassessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT mallemathaney theassessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT schoenherrjordanr theassessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT millingtonscottj assessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT arntfieldrobertt assessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT guorobertjie assessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT koenigseth assessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT korypierre assessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT noblevicki assessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT mallemathaney assessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound
AT schoenherrjordanr assessmentofcompetencyinthoracicsonographyactsscalevalidationofatoolforpointofcareultrasound