Cargando…

Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems have been used to assess anatomical findings on upper airway obstruction, and decide and plan surgical treatments and act as a predictor for surgical treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnoea management. The first objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dijemeni, Esuabom, D’Amone, Gabriele, Gbati, Israel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1521-6
_version_ 1783281094377865216
author Dijemeni, Esuabom
D’Amone, Gabriele
Gbati, Israel
author_facet Dijemeni, Esuabom
D’Amone, Gabriele
Gbati, Israel
author_sort Dijemeni, Esuabom
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems have been used to assess anatomical findings on upper airway obstruction, and decide and plan surgical treatments and act as a predictor for surgical treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnoea management. The first objective is to identify if there is a universally accepted DISE grading and classification system for analysing DISE findings. The second objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment planning framework for deciding appropriate surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The third objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment outcome framework for determining the likelihood of success for a given OSA surgical intervention. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify new and significantly modified DISE classification systems: concept, advantages and disadvantages. RESULTS: Fourteen studies proposing a new DISE classification system and three studies proposing a significantly modified DISE classification were identified. None of the studies were based on randomised control trials. CONCLUSION: DISE is an objective method for visualising upper airway obstruction. The classification and assessment of clinical findings based on DISE is highly subjective due to the increasing number of DISE classification systems. Hence, this creates a growing divergence in surgical treatment planning and treatment outcome. Further research on a universally accepted objective DISE assessment is critically needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5700212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57002122017-12-04 Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis Dijemeni, Esuabom D’Amone, Gabriele Gbati, Israel Sleep Breath ENT • Review PURPOSE: Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems have been used to assess anatomical findings on upper airway obstruction, and decide and plan surgical treatments and act as a predictor for surgical treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnoea management. The first objective is to identify if there is a universally accepted DISE grading and classification system for analysing DISE findings. The second objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment planning framework for deciding appropriate surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The third objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment outcome framework for determining the likelihood of success for a given OSA surgical intervention. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify new and significantly modified DISE classification systems: concept, advantages and disadvantages. RESULTS: Fourteen studies proposing a new DISE classification system and three studies proposing a significantly modified DISE classification were identified. None of the studies were based on randomised control trials. CONCLUSION: DISE is an objective method for visualising upper airway obstruction. The classification and assessment of clinical findings based on DISE is highly subjective due to the increasing number of DISE classification systems. Hence, this creates a growing divergence in surgical treatment planning and treatment outcome. Further research on a universally accepted objective DISE assessment is critically needed. Springer International Publishing 2017-06-06 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5700212/ /pubmed/28584940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1521-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle ENT • Review
Dijemeni, Esuabom
D’Amone, Gabriele
Gbati, Israel
Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort drug-induced sedation endoscopy (dise) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic ENT • Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1521-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dijemeniesuabom druginducedsedationendoscopydiseclassificationsystemsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT damonegabriele druginducedsedationendoscopydiseclassificationsystemsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gbatiisrael druginducedsedationendoscopydiseclassificationsystemsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis