Cargando…
Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems have been used to assess anatomical findings on upper airway obstruction, and decide and plan surgical treatments and act as a predictor for surgical treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnoea management. The first objective...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1521-6 |
_version_ | 1783281094377865216 |
---|---|
author | Dijemeni, Esuabom D’Amone, Gabriele Gbati, Israel |
author_facet | Dijemeni, Esuabom D’Amone, Gabriele Gbati, Israel |
author_sort | Dijemeni, Esuabom |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems have been used to assess anatomical findings on upper airway obstruction, and decide and plan surgical treatments and act as a predictor for surgical treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnoea management. The first objective is to identify if there is a universally accepted DISE grading and classification system for analysing DISE findings. The second objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment planning framework for deciding appropriate surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The third objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment outcome framework for determining the likelihood of success for a given OSA surgical intervention. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify new and significantly modified DISE classification systems: concept, advantages and disadvantages. RESULTS: Fourteen studies proposing a new DISE classification system and three studies proposing a significantly modified DISE classification were identified. None of the studies were based on randomised control trials. CONCLUSION: DISE is an objective method for visualising upper airway obstruction. The classification and assessment of clinical findings based on DISE is highly subjective due to the increasing number of DISE classification systems. Hence, this creates a growing divergence in surgical treatment planning and treatment outcome. Further research on a universally accepted objective DISE assessment is critically needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5700212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57002122017-12-04 Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis Dijemeni, Esuabom D’Amone, Gabriele Gbati, Israel Sleep Breath ENT • Review PURPOSE: Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems have been used to assess anatomical findings on upper airway obstruction, and decide and plan surgical treatments and act as a predictor for surgical treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnoea management. The first objective is to identify if there is a universally accepted DISE grading and classification system for analysing DISE findings. The second objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment planning framework for deciding appropriate surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The third objective is to identify if there is one DISE grading and classification treatment outcome framework for determining the likelihood of success for a given OSA surgical intervention. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify new and significantly modified DISE classification systems: concept, advantages and disadvantages. RESULTS: Fourteen studies proposing a new DISE classification system and three studies proposing a significantly modified DISE classification were identified. None of the studies were based on randomised control trials. CONCLUSION: DISE is an objective method for visualising upper airway obstruction. The classification and assessment of clinical findings based on DISE is highly subjective due to the increasing number of DISE classification systems. Hence, this creates a growing divergence in surgical treatment planning and treatment outcome. Further research on a universally accepted objective DISE assessment is critically needed. Springer International Publishing 2017-06-06 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5700212/ /pubmed/28584940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1521-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | ENT • Review Dijemeni, Esuabom D’Amone, Gabriele Gbati, Israel Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | drug-induced sedation endoscopy (dise) classification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | ENT • Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1521-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dijemeniesuabom druginducedsedationendoscopydiseclassificationsystemsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT damonegabriele druginducedsedationendoscopydiseclassificationsystemsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gbatiisrael druginducedsedationendoscopydiseclassificationsystemsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |