Cargando…
Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma
AIM: To test the validity of tumour thickness measurement in distinguishing between the different infiltration depths, especially when the duplication of muscularis mucosae cannot be demarcated clearly. METHODS: We re-evaluated 100 completely embedded Barrett’s adenocarcinomas regarding m-classifica...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204253 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i11.444 |
_version_ | 1783281111943610368 |
---|---|
author | Endhardt, Katharina Märkl, Bruno Probst, Andreas Schaller, Tina Aust, Daniela |
author_facet | Endhardt, Katharina Märkl, Bruno Probst, Andreas Schaller, Tina Aust, Daniela |
author_sort | Endhardt, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To test the validity of tumour thickness measurement in distinguishing between the different infiltration depths, especially when the duplication of muscularis mucosae cannot be demarcated clearly. METHODS: We re-evaluated 100 completely embedded Barrett’s adenocarcinomas regarding m-classification, maximum tumour thickness, and muscularis mucosae duplication. For validation, smoothelin staining was performed on a subset of cases. RESULTS: The m1-, m2- and m3-classified adenocarcinomas showed a significant lower tumour thickness compared to the m4- and sm1-classified lesions (P < 0.001). Smoothelin staining determined a clear muscularis mucosae duplication in 64% of the tested samples and enabled the differentiation of the two layers in diffuse and merged splits. CONCLUSION: Tumour thickness in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma significantly correlates with the depth of infiltration and demonstrates its worth as an accurate pT classification in non-polypoid lesions. We created a new algorithm, which combines histomorphology with morphometric analyses. It is noteworthy that it facilitates the assessment of mucosal vs submucosal infiltration depth. The smoothelin staining strengthened our results of the tumour thickness evaluation and can be used in cases of doubt. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5700386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57003862017-12-04 Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma Endhardt, Katharina Märkl, Bruno Probst, Andreas Schaller, Tina Aust, Daniela World J Gastrointest Oncol Clinical Trials Study AIM: To test the validity of tumour thickness measurement in distinguishing between the different infiltration depths, especially when the duplication of muscularis mucosae cannot be demarcated clearly. METHODS: We re-evaluated 100 completely embedded Barrett’s adenocarcinomas regarding m-classification, maximum tumour thickness, and muscularis mucosae duplication. For validation, smoothelin staining was performed on a subset of cases. RESULTS: The m1-, m2- and m3-classified adenocarcinomas showed a significant lower tumour thickness compared to the m4- and sm1-classified lesions (P < 0.001). Smoothelin staining determined a clear muscularis mucosae duplication in 64% of the tested samples and enabled the differentiation of the two layers in diffuse and merged splits. CONCLUSION: Tumour thickness in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma significantly correlates with the depth of infiltration and demonstrates its worth as an accurate pT classification in non-polypoid lesions. We created a new algorithm, which combines histomorphology with morphometric analyses. It is noteworthy that it facilitates the assessment of mucosal vs submucosal infiltration depth. The smoothelin staining strengthened our results of the tumour thickness evaluation and can be used in cases of doubt. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-11-15 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5700386/ /pubmed/29204253 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i11.444 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials Study Endhardt, Katharina Märkl, Bruno Probst, Andreas Schaller, Tina Aust, Daniela Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title | Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_full | Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_short | Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma |
topic | Clinical Trials Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204253 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i11.444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT endhardtkatharina valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma AT marklbruno valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma AT probstandreas valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma AT schallertina valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma AT austdaniela valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma |