Cargando…

Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma

AIM: To test the validity of tumour thickness measurement in distinguishing between the different infiltration depths, especially when the duplication of muscularis mucosae cannot be demarcated clearly. METHODS: We re-evaluated 100 completely embedded Barrett’s adenocarcinomas regarding m-classifica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Endhardt, Katharina, Märkl, Bruno, Probst, Andreas, Schaller, Tina, Aust, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204253
http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i11.444
_version_ 1783281111943610368
author Endhardt, Katharina
Märkl, Bruno
Probst, Andreas
Schaller, Tina
Aust, Daniela
author_facet Endhardt, Katharina
Märkl, Bruno
Probst, Andreas
Schaller, Tina
Aust, Daniela
author_sort Endhardt, Katharina
collection PubMed
description AIM: To test the validity of tumour thickness measurement in distinguishing between the different infiltration depths, especially when the duplication of muscularis mucosae cannot be demarcated clearly. METHODS: We re-evaluated 100 completely embedded Barrett’s adenocarcinomas regarding m-classification, maximum tumour thickness, and muscularis mucosae duplication. For validation, smoothelin staining was performed on a subset of cases. RESULTS: The m1-, m2- and m3-classified adenocarcinomas showed a significant lower tumour thickness compared to the m4- and sm1-classified lesions (P < 0.001). Smoothelin staining determined a clear muscularis mucosae duplication in 64% of the tested samples and enabled the differentiation of the two layers in diffuse and merged splits. CONCLUSION: Tumour thickness in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma significantly correlates with the depth of infiltration and demonstrates its worth as an accurate pT classification in non-polypoid lesions. We created a new algorithm, which combines histomorphology with morphometric analyses. It is noteworthy that it facilitates the assessment of mucosal vs submucosal infiltration depth. The smoothelin staining strengthened our results of the tumour thickness evaluation and can be used in cases of doubt.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5700386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57003862017-12-04 Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma Endhardt, Katharina Märkl, Bruno Probst, Andreas Schaller, Tina Aust, Daniela World J Gastrointest Oncol Clinical Trials Study AIM: To test the validity of tumour thickness measurement in distinguishing between the different infiltration depths, especially when the duplication of muscularis mucosae cannot be demarcated clearly. METHODS: We re-evaluated 100 completely embedded Barrett’s adenocarcinomas regarding m-classification, maximum tumour thickness, and muscularis mucosae duplication. For validation, smoothelin staining was performed on a subset of cases. RESULTS: The m1-, m2- and m3-classified adenocarcinomas showed a significant lower tumour thickness compared to the m4- and sm1-classified lesions (P < 0.001). Smoothelin staining determined a clear muscularis mucosae duplication in 64% of the tested samples and enabled the differentiation of the two layers in diffuse and merged splits. CONCLUSION: Tumour thickness in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma significantly correlates with the depth of infiltration and demonstrates its worth as an accurate pT classification in non-polypoid lesions. We created a new algorithm, which combines histomorphology with morphometric analyses. It is noteworthy that it facilitates the assessment of mucosal vs submucosal infiltration depth. The smoothelin staining strengthened our results of the tumour thickness evaluation and can be used in cases of doubt. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-11-15 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5700386/ /pubmed/29204253 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i11.444 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials Study
Endhardt, Katharina
Märkl, Bruno
Probst, Andreas
Schaller, Tina
Aust, Daniela
Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_short Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_sort value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma
topic Clinical Trials Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204253
http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i11.444
work_keys_str_mv AT endhardtkatharina valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT marklbruno valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT probstandreas valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT schallertina valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT austdaniela valueofhistomorphometrictumourthicknessandsmoothelinforconventionalmclassificationinearlyoesophagealadenocarcinoma