Cargando…
Electronic Brief Intervention and Text Messaging for Marijuana Use During Pregnancy: Initial Acceptability of Patients and Providers
BACKGROUND: Marijuana is the most widely used illicit substance during pregnancy. Technology-delivered brief interventions and text messaging have shown promise in general and pregnant samples but have not yet been applied to marijuana use in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117931 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7927 |
_version_ | 1783281113665372160 |
---|---|
author | Gray, Justin Beatty, Jessica R Svikis, Dace S Puder, Karoline S Resnicow, Ken Konkel, Janine Rice, Shetoya McGoron, Lucy Ondersma, Steven J |
author_facet | Gray, Justin Beatty, Jessica R Svikis, Dace S Puder, Karoline S Resnicow, Ken Konkel, Janine Rice, Shetoya McGoron, Lucy Ondersma, Steven J |
author_sort | Gray, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Marijuana is the most widely used illicit substance during pregnancy. Technology-delivered brief interventions and text messaging have shown promise in general and pregnant samples but have not yet been applied to marijuana use in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate, among pregnant women and prenatal care providers, the acceptability of an electronic brief intervention and text messaging plan for marijuana use in pregnancy. METHODS: Participants included patients (n=10) and medical staff (n=12) from an urban prenatal clinic. Patient-participants were recruited directly during a prenatal care visit. Those who were eligible reviewed the interventions individually and provided quantitative and qualitative feedback regarding software acceptability and helpfulness during a one-on-one interview with research staff. Provider-participants took part in focus groups in which the intervention materials were reviewed and discussed. Qualitative and focus group feedback was transcribed, coded manually, and classified by category and theme. RESULTS: Patient-participants provided high ratings for satisfaction, with mean ratings for respectfulness, interest, ease of use, and helpfulness ranging between 4.4 and 4.7 on a 5-point Likert scale. Of the 10 participants, 5 reported that they preferred working with the program versus their doctor, and 9 of 10 said the intervention made them more likely to reduce their marijuana use. Provider-participants received the program favorably, stating the information presented was both relevant and important for their patient population. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the acceptability of electronic brief intervention and text messaging for marijuana use during pregnancy. This, combined with their ease of use and low barrier to initiation, suggests that further evaluation in a randomized trial is appropriate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5700401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57004012017-11-29 Electronic Brief Intervention and Text Messaging for Marijuana Use During Pregnancy: Initial Acceptability of Patients and Providers Gray, Justin Beatty, Jessica R Svikis, Dace S Puder, Karoline S Resnicow, Ken Konkel, Janine Rice, Shetoya McGoron, Lucy Ondersma, Steven J JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Marijuana is the most widely used illicit substance during pregnancy. Technology-delivered brief interventions and text messaging have shown promise in general and pregnant samples but have not yet been applied to marijuana use in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate, among pregnant women and prenatal care providers, the acceptability of an electronic brief intervention and text messaging plan for marijuana use in pregnancy. METHODS: Participants included patients (n=10) and medical staff (n=12) from an urban prenatal clinic. Patient-participants were recruited directly during a prenatal care visit. Those who were eligible reviewed the interventions individually and provided quantitative and qualitative feedback regarding software acceptability and helpfulness during a one-on-one interview with research staff. Provider-participants took part in focus groups in which the intervention materials were reviewed and discussed. Qualitative and focus group feedback was transcribed, coded manually, and classified by category and theme. RESULTS: Patient-participants provided high ratings for satisfaction, with mean ratings for respectfulness, interest, ease of use, and helpfulness ranging between 4.4 and 4.7 on a 5-point Likert scale. Of the 10 participants, 5 reported that they preferred working with the program versus their doctor, and 9 of 10 said the intervention made them more likely to reduce their marijuana use. Provider-participants received the program favorably, stating the information presented was both relevant and important for their patient population. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the acceptability of electronic brief intervention and text messaging for marijuana use during pregnancy. This, combined with their ease of use and low barrier to initiation, suggests that further evaluation in a randomized trial is appropriate. JMIR Publications 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5700401/ /pubmed/29117931 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7927 Text en ©Justin Gray, Jessica R Beatty, Dace S Svikis, Karoline S Puder, Ken Resnicow, Janine Konkel, Shetoya Rice, Lucy McGoron, Steven J Ondersma. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 08.11.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gray, Justin Beatty, Jessica R Svikis, Dace S Puder, Karoline S Resnicow, Ken Konkel, Janine Rice, Shetoya McGoron, Lucy Ondersma, Steven J Electronic Brief Intervention and Text Messaging for Marijuana Use During Pregnancy: Initial Acceptability of Patients and Providers |
title | Electronic Brief Intervention and Text Messaging for Marijuana Use During Pregnancy: Initial Acceptability of Patients and Providers |
title_full | Electronic Brief Intervention and Text Messaging for Marijuana Use During Pregnancy: Initial Acceptability of Patients and Providers |
title_fullStr | Electronic Brief Intervention and Text Messaging for Marijuana Use During Pregnancy: Initial Acceptability of Patients and Providers |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic Brief Intervention and Text Messaging for Marijuana Use During Pregnancy: Initial Acceptability of Patients and Providers |
title_short | Electronic Brief Intervention and Text Messaging for Marijuana Use During Pregnancy: Initial Acceptability of Patients and Providers |
title_sort | electronic brief intervention and text messaging for marijuana use during pregnancy: initial acceptability of patients and providers |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29117931 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grayjustin electronicbriefinterventionandtextmessagingformarijuanauseduringpregnancyinitialacceptabilityofpatientsandproviders AT beattyjessicar electronicbriefinterventionandtextmessagingformarijuanauseduringpregnancyinitialacceptabilityofpatientsandproviders AT svikisdaces electronicbriefinterventionandtextmessagingformarijuanauseduringpregnancyinitialacceptabilityofpatientsandproviders AT puderkarolines electronicbriefinterventionandtextmessagingformarijuanauseduringpregnancyinitialacceptabilityofpatientsandproviders AT resnicowken electronicbriefinterventionandtextmessagingformarijuanauseduringpregnancyinitialacceptabilityofpatientsandproviders AT konkeljanine electronicbriefinterventionandtextmessagingformarijuanauseduringpregnancyinitialacceptabilityofpatientsandproviders AT riceshetoya electronicbriefinterventionandtextmessagingformarijuanauseduringpregnancyinitialacceptabilityofpatientsandproviders AT mcgoronlucy electronicbriefinterventionandtextmessagingformarijuanauseduringpregnancyinitialacceptabilityofpatientsandproviders AT ondersmastevenj electronicbriefinterventionandtextmessagingformarijuanauseduringpregnancyinitialacceptabilityofpatientsandproviders |