Cargando…
Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD
Background: Researchers and clinicians within the field of trauma have to choose between different diagnostic descriptions of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the DSM-5 and the proposed ICD-11. Several studies support different competing models of the PTSD structure according to both diagnost...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1398002 |
_version_ | 1783281129410789376 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Maj Hyland, Philip Karstoft, Karen-Inge Vaegter, Henrik B. Bramsen, Rikke H. Nielsen, Anni B. S. Armour, Cherie Andersen, Søren B. Høybye, Mette Terp Larsen, Simone Kongshøj Andersen, Tonny E. |
author_facet | Hansen, Maj Hyland, Philip Karstoft, Karen-Inge Vaegter, Henrik B. Bramsen, Rikke H. Nielsen, Anni B. S. Armour, Cherie Andersen, Søren B. Høybye, Mette Terp Larsen, Simone Kongshøj Andersen, Tonny E. |
author_sort | Hansen, Maj |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Researchers and clinicians within the field of trauma have to choose between different diagnostic descriptions of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the DSM-5 and the proposed ICD-11. Several studies support different competing models of the PTSD structure according to both diagnostic systems; however, findings show that the choice of diagnostic systems can affect the estimated prevalence rates. Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the potential impact of using a large (i.e. the DSM-5) compared to a small (i.e. the ICD-11) diagnostic description of PTSD. In other words, does the size of PTSD really matter? Methods: The aim was investigated by examining differences in diagnostic rates between the two diagnostic systems and independently examining the model fit of the competing DSM-5 and ICD-11 models of PTSD across three trauma samples: university students (N = 4213), chronic pain patients (N = 573), and military personnel (N = 118). Results: Diagnostic rates of PTSD were significantly lower according to the proposed ICD-11 criteria in the university sample, but no significant differences were found for chronic pain patients and military personnel. The proposed ICD-11 three-factor model provided the best fit of the tested ICD-11 models across all samples, whereas the DSM-5 seven-factor Hybrid model provided the best fit in the university and pain samples, and the DSM-5 six-factor Anhedonia model provided the best fit in the military sample of the tested DSM-5 models. Conclusions: The advantages and disadvantages of using a broad or narrow set of symptoms for PTSD can be debated, however, this study demonstrated that choice of diagnostic system may influence the estimated PTSD rates both qualitatively and quantitatively. In the current described diagnostic criteria only the ICD-11 model can reflect the configuration of symptoms satisfactorily. Thus, size does matter when assessing PTSD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5700490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57004902017-12-01 Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD Hansen, Maj Hyland, Philip Karstoft, Karen-Inge Vaegter, Henrik B. Bramsen, Rikke H. Nielsen, Anni B. S. Armour, Cherie Andersen, Søren B. Høybye, Mette Terp Larsen, Simone Kongshøj Andersen, Tonny E. Eur J Psychotraumatol Basic Research Article Background: Researchers and clinicians within the field of trauma have to choose between different diagnostic descriptions of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the DSM-5 and the proposed ICD-11. Several studies support different competing models of the PTSD structure according to both diagnostic systems; however, findings show that the choice of diagnostic systems can affect the estimated prevalence rates. Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the potential impact of using a large (i.e. the DSM-5) compared to a small (i.e. the ICD-11) diagnostic description of PTSD. In other words, does the size of PTSD really matter? Methods: The aim was investigated by examining differences in diagnostic rates between the two diagnostic systems and independently examining the model fit of the competing DSM-5 and ICD-11 models of PTSD across three trauma samples: university students (N = 4213), chronic pain patients (N = 573), and military personnel (N = 118). Results: Diagnostic rates of PTSD were significantly lower according to the proposed ICD-11 criteria in the university sample, but no significant differences were found for chronic pain patients and military personnel. The proposed ICD-11 three-factor model provided the best fit of the tested ICD-11 models across all samples, whereas the DSM-5 seven-factor Hybrid model provided the best fit in the university and pain samples, and the DSM-5 six-factor Anhedonia model provided the best fit in the military sample of the tested DSM-5 models. Conclusions: The advantages and disadvantages of using a broad or narrow set of symptoms for PTSD can be debated, however, this study demonstrated that choice of diagnostic system may influence the estimated PTSD rates both qualitatively and quantitatively. In the current described diagnostic criteria only the ICD-11 model can reflect the configuration of symptoms satisfactorily. Thus, size does matter when assessing PTSD. Taylor & Francis 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5700490/ /pubmed/29201287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1398002 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Basic Research Article Hansen, Maj Hyland, Philip Karstoft, Karen-Inge Vaegter, Henrik B. Bramsen, Rikke H. Nielsen, Anni B. S. Armour, Cherie Andersen, Søren B. Høybye, Mette Terp Larsen, Simone Kongshøj Andersen, Tonny E. Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD |
title | Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD |
title_full | Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD |
title_fullStr | Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD |
title_full_unstemmed | Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD |
title_short | Does size really matter? A multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for PTSD |
title_sort | does size really matter? a multisite study assessing the latent structure of the proposed icd-11 and dsm-5 diagnostic criteria for ptsd |
topic | Basic Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1398002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenmaj doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT hylandphilip doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT karstoftkareninge doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT vaegterhenrikb doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT bramsenrikkeh doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT nielsenannibs doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT armourcherie doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT andersensørenb doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT høybyemetteterp doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT larsensimonekongshøj doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd AT andersentonnye doessizereallymatteramultisitestudyassessingthelatentstructureoftheproposedicd11anddsm5diagnosticcriteriaforptsd |