Cargando…

Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa

Background: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doherty, Jane E, Wilkinson, Thomas, Edoka, Ijeoma, Hofman, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194
_version_ 1783281140591755264
author Doherty, Jane E
Wilkinson, Thomas
Edoka, Ijeoma
Hofman, Karen
author_facet Doherty, Jane E
Wilkinson, Thomas
Edoka, Ijeoma
Hofman, Karen
author_sort Doherty, Jane E
collection PubMed
description Background: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacity of individuals, institutions and networks to apply economic evaluation in support of health technology assessment and effective priority-setting. Objective: On the basis of international  lessons, to identify how research organisations and partnerships could contribute to capacity strengthening for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa. Methods: A rapid scan was conducted of international formal and grey literature and lessons extracted from the deliberations of two international and regional workshops relating to capacity-building for health technology assessment. ‘Capacity’ was defined in broad terms, including a conducive political environment, strong public institutional capacity to drive priority-setting, effective networking between experts, strong research organisations and skilled researchers. Results: Effective priority-setting requires more than high quality economic research. Researchers have to engage with an array of stakeholders, network closely other research organisations, build partnerships with different levels of government and train the future generation of researchers and policy-makers. In low- and middle-income countries where there are seldom government units or agencies dedicated to health technology assessment, they also have to support the development of an effective priority-setting process that is sensitive to societal and government needs and priorities. Conclusions: Research organisations have an important role to play in contributing to the development of health technology assessment and priority-setting capacity. In Africa, where there are resource and capacity challenges, effective partnerships between local and international researchers, and with key government stakeholders, can leverage existing skills and knowledge to generate a critical mass of individuals and institutions. These would help to meet the priority-setting needs of African countries and contribute to sustainable universal health coverage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5700536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57005362017-12-01 Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa Doherty, Jane E Wilkinson, Thomas Edoka, Ijeoma Hofman, Karen Glob Health Action Capacity Building Article Background: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacity of individuals, institutions and networks to apply economic evaluation in support of health technology assessment and effective priority-setting. Objective: On the basis of international  lessons, to identify how research organisations and partnerships could contribute to capacity strengthening for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa. Methods: A rapid scan was conducted of international formal and grey literature and lessons extracted from the deliberations of two international and regional workshops relating to capacity-building for health technology assessment. ‘Capacity’ was defined in broad terms, including a conducive political environment, strong public institutional capacity to drive priority-setting, effective networking between experts, strong research organisations and skilled researchers. Results: Effective priority-setting requires more than high quality economic research. Researchers have to engage with an array of stakeholders, network closely other research organisations, build partnerships with different levels of government and train the future generation of researchers and policy-makers. In low- and middle-income countries where there are seldom government units or agencies dedicated to health technology assessment, they also have to support the development of an effective priority-setting process that is sensitive to societal and government needs and priorities. Conclusions: Research organisations have an important role to play in contributing to the development of health technology assessment and priority-setting capacity. In Africa, where there are resource and capacity challenges, effective partnerships between local and international researchers, and with key government stakeholders, can leverage existing skills and knowledge to generate a critical mass of individuals and institutions. These would help to meet the priority-setting needs of African countries and contribute to sustainable universal health coverage. Taylor & Francis 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5700536/ /pubmed/29035166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194 Text en © 2017 University of Witwatersrand. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Capacity Building Article
Doherty, Jane E
Wilkinson, Thomas
Edoka, Ijeoma
Hofman, Karen
Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_full Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_fullStr Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_short Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_sort strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in africa
topic Capacity Building Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194
work_keys_str_mv AT dohertyjanee strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica
AT wilkinsonthomas strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica
AT edokaijeoma strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica
AT hofmankaren strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica