Cargando…

Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the corticosteroids for uveal effusion syndrome (UES). METHODS: Retrospective series of 104 eyes with UES treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS), periocular corticosteroids (PCS), topical corticosteroids (TCS), or observation (OBS). Main outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shields, Carol L, Roelofs, Kelsey, Di Nicola, Maura, Sioufi, Kareem, Mashayekhi, Arman, Shields, Jerry A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133632
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_752_17
_version_ 1783281150240751616
author Shields, Carol L
Roelofs, Kelsey
Di Nicola, Maura
Sioufi, Kareem
Mashayekhi, Arman
Shields, Jerry A
author_facet Shields, Carol L
Roelofs, Kelsey
Di Nicola, Maura
Sioufi, Kareem
Mashayekhi, Arman
Shields, Jerry A
author_sort Shields, Carol L
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the corticosteroids for uveal effusion syndrome (UES). METHODS: Retrospective series of 104 eyes with UES treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS), periocular corticosteroids (PCS), topical corticosteroids (TCS), or observation (OBS). Main outcome measure was UES resolution. RESULTS: Of 104 eyes, treatment included OCS (n = 27), PCS (n = 12), TCS (n = 11), and OBS (n = 54). A comparison of the four groups (OCS vs. PCS vs. TCS vs. OBS) revealed differences in those managed with OCS versus OBS as younger (66 vs. 72 years, P = 0.049), PCS versus OBS as male (100% vs. 54%, P = 0.002), PCS versus OBS with decreased visual acuity (VA)/visual field (91% vs. 51%, P = 0.018), and OBS versus OCS as asymptomatic (28% vs. 0%, P = 0.001). Of the 59 with follow-up information, management included OCS (n = 21), PCS (n = 12), TCS (n = 6), and OBS (n = 20). There were differences in initial VA <20/400 in PCS versus OBS (42% vs. 5%, P = 0.018), effusion thickness in TCS versus OCS (7 vs. 3 mm, P = 0.004), and serous retinal detachment in PCS versus OBS (100% vs. 30%, P < 0.001) and PCS versus OCS (100% vs. 57%, P = 0.012). Regarding outcomes, VA showed less worsening in OCS versus OBS (0% vs. 30%, P = 0.008) and OCS versus PCS (0% vs. 33%, P = 0.012). There was no difference in rate of effusion resolution or effusion recurrence. Overall, using combination of corticosteroid therapies, effusion resolution was achieved in 56/59 (95%) cases and the need for surgical management with scleral windows was necessary in only 3/59 (5%) cases. Complications included cataract (n = 9) and no instance of steroid-induced glaucoma. CONCLUSION: Management of UES is complex and depends on disease severity. Using various corticosteroid delivery routes, UES control was achieved in 95%, and scleral window surgery was required in only 5%. A trial of corticosteroids can benefit patients with UES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5700574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57005742017-12-01 Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture Shields, Carol L Roelofs, Kelsey Di Nicola, Maura Sioufi, Kareem Mashayekhi, Arman Shields, Jerry A Indian J Ophthalmol Featured Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the corticosteroids for uveal effusion syndrome (UES). METHODS: Retrospective series of 104 eyes with UES treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS), periocular corticosteroids (PCS), topical corticosteroids (TCS), or observation (OBS). Main outcome measure was UES resolution. RESULTS: Of 104 eyes, treatment included OCS (n = 27), PCS (n = 12), TCS (n = 11), and OBS (n = 54). A comparison of the four groups (OCS vs. PCS vs. TCS vs. OBS) revealed differences in those managed with OCS versus OBS as younger (66 vs. 72 years, P = 0.049), PCS versus OBS as male (100% vs. 54%, P = 0.002), PCS versus OBS with decreased visual acuity (VA)/visual field (91% vs. 51%, P = 0.018), and OBS versus OCS as asymptomatic (28% vs. 0%, P = 0.001). Of the 59 with follow-up information, management included OCS (n = 21), PCS (n = 12), TCS (n = 6), and OBS (n = 20). There were differences in initial VA <20/400 in PCS versus OBS (42% vs. 5%, P = 0.018), effusion thickness in TCS versus OCS (7 vs. 3 mm, P = 0.004), and serous retinal detachment in PCS versus OBS (100% vs. 30%, P < 0.001) and PCS versus OCS (100% vs. 57%, P = 0.012). Regarding outcomes, VA showed less worsening in OCS versus OBS (0% vs. 30%, P = 0.008) and OCS versus PCS (0% vs. 33%, P = 0.012). There was no difference in rate of effusion resolution or effusion recurrence. Overall, using combination of corticosteroid therapies, effusion resolution was achieved in 56/59 (95%) cases and the need for surgical management with scleral windows was necessary in only 3/59 (5%) cases. Complications included cataract (n = 9) and no instance of steroid-induced glaucoma. CONCLUSION: Management of UES is complex and depends on disease severity. Using various corticosteroid delivery routes, UES control was achieved in 95%, and scleral window surgery was required in only 5%. A trial of corticosteroids can benefit patients with UES. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5700574/ /pubmed/29133632 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_752_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Featured Original Article
Shields, Carol L
Roelofs, Kelsey
Di Nicola, Maura
Sioufi, Kareem
Mashayekhi, Arman
Shields, Jerry A
Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_full Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_fullStr Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_full_unstemmed Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_short Uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: Response to corticosteroids – The 2017 Axel C. Hansen lecture
title_sort uveal effusion syndrome in 104 eyes: response to corticosteroids – the 2017 axel c. hansen lecture
topic Featured Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133632
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_752_17
work_keys_str_mv AT shieldscaroll uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT roelofskelsey uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT dinicolamaura uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT sioufikareem uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT mashayekhiarman uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture
AT shieldsjerrya uvealeffusionsyndromein104eyesresponsetocorticosteroidsthe2017axelchansenlecture