Cargando…

Evaluation of the Schöttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee

BACKGROUND: The Schöttle point is commonly used for anatomic femoral tunnel placement during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. This technique has not been previously validated in the skeletally immature patient, in whom femoral tunnel placement may put the distal femoral physis a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huston, Kellen L., Okoroafor, Ugochi C., Kaar, Scott G., Wentt, Christa L., Saluan, Paul, Farrow, Lutul D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
63
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117740078
_version_ 1783281200046014464
author Huston, Kellen L.
Okoroafor, Ugochi C.
Kaar, Scott G.
Wentt, Christa L.
Saluan, Paul
Farrow, Lutul D.
author_facet Huston, Kellen L.
Okoroafor, Ugochi C.
Kaar, Scott G.
Wentt, Christa L.
Saluan, Paul
Farrow, Lutul D.
author_sort Huston, Kellen L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Schöttle point is commonly used for anatomic femoral tunnel placement during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. This technique has not been previously validated in the skeletally immature patient, in whom femoral tunnel placement may put the distal femoral physis at risk of iatrogenic injury. HYPOTHESIS: Interobserver reliability for femoral tunnel placement will be higher in adult knees compared with pediatric knees. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We selected 30 perfect lateral radiographs for this study: 20 from pediatric knees (mean patient age, 10 years; range, 8-11 years) and 10 from adult knees (mean patient age, 18.5 years; range, 18-23 years). Six observers with varying levels of clinical experience evaluated each radiograph and approximated the site of the MPFL femoral tunnel using the Schöttle technique. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities for femoral tunnel placement were evaluated. Statistical analysis was used to compare measurements. RESULTS: During initial interobserver measurements, the diameter of the composite perfect circles averaged 9.0 and 6.8 mm in adult and pediatric knees, respectively (P = .004). At repeat measurement, circles averaged 9.8 and 7.3 mm in adult and pediatric knees, respectively (P = .0001). Femoral tunnel placement intraobserver variance averaged 2.9 mm in adult knees (range, 1.9-4.0 mm) and 2.3 mm in pediatric knees (range, 1.9-2.9 mm). This difference was not significant (P = .14). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that interobserver variance is actually greater in adult knees compared with pediatric knees, although interobserver variance was significantly different for both populations. Additionally, intraobserver variance is small on repeat measures, demonstrating that the Schöttle technique is reproducible for individual observers. Sources of this increased variance between observers are differences in agreement on the bony landmarks required for the Schöttle technique. Due to this variability in tunnel placement, we recommend caution when the Schöttle technique is used in pediatric knees to avoid iatrogenic injury to the distal femoral physis during femoral tunnel placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5700790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57007902017-12-01 Evaluation of the Schöttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee Huston, Kellen L. Okoroafor, Ugochi C. Kaar, Scott G. Wentt, Christa L. Saluan, Paul Farrow, Lutul D. Orthop J Sports Med 63 BACKGROUND: The Schöttle point is commonly used for anatomic femoral tunnel placement during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. This technique has not been previously validated in the skeletally immature patient, in whom femoral tunnel placement may put the distal femoral physis at risk of iatrogenic injury. HYPOTHESIS: Interobserver reliability for femoral tunnel placement will be higher in adult knees compared with pediatric knees. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We selected 30 perfect lateral radiographs for this study: 20 from pediatric knees (mean patient age, 10 years; range, 8-11 years) and 10 from adult knees (mean patient age, 18.5 years; range, 18-23 years). Six observers with varying levels of clinical experience evaluated each radiograph and approximated the site of the MPFL femoral tunnel using the Schöttle technique. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities for femoral tunnel placement were evaluated. Statistical analysis was used to compare measurements. RESULTS: During initial interobserver measurements, the diameter of the composite perfect circles averaged 9.0 and 6.8 mm in adult and pediatric knees, respectively (P = .004). At repeat measurement, circles averaged 9.8 and 7.3 mm in adult and pediatric knees, respectively (P = .0001). Femoral tunnel placement intraobserver variance averaged 2.9 mm in adult knees (range, 1.9-4.0 mm) and 2.3 mm in pediatric knees (range, 1.9-2.9 mm). This difference was not significant (P = .14). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that interobserver variance is actually greater in adult knees compared with pediatric knees, although interobserver variance was significantly different for both populations. Additionally, intraobserver variance is small on repeat measures, demonstrating that the Schöttle technique is reproducible for individual observers. Sources of this increased variance between observers are differences in agreement on the bony landmarks required for the Schöttle technique. Due to this variability in tunnel placement, we recommend caution when the Schöttle technique is used in pediatric knees to avoid iatrogenic injury to the distal femoral physis during femoral tunnel placement. SAGE Publications 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5700790/ /pubmed/29201929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117740078 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 63
Huston, Kellen L.
Okoroafor, Ugochi C.
Kaar, Scott G.
Wentt, Christa L.
Saluan, Paul
Farrow, Lutul D.
Evaluation of the Schöttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee
title Evaluation of the Schöttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee
title_full Evaluation of the Schöttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Schöttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Schöttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee
title_short Evaluation of the Schöttle Technique in the Pediatric Knee
title_sort evaluation of the schöttle technique in the pediatric knee
topic 63
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117740078
work_keys_str_mv AT hustonkellenl evaluationoftheschottletechniqueinthepediatricknee
AT okoroaforugochic evaluationoftheschottletechniqueinthepediatricknee
AT kaarscottg evaluationoftheschottletechniqueinthepediatricknee
AT wenttchristal evaluationoftheschottletechniqueinthepediatricknee
AT saluanpaul evaluationoftheschottletechniqueinthepediatricknee
AT farrowlutuld evaluationoftheschottletechniqueinthepediatricknee