Cargando…

Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review

Continuous monitoring of spine movement function could enhance our understanding of low back pain development. Wearable technologies have gained popularity as promising alternative to laboratory systems in allowing ambulatory movement analysis. This paper aims to review the state of art of current u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papi, Enrica, Koh, Woon Senn, McGregor, Alison H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29102267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.037
_version_ 1783281203357417472
author Papi, Enrica
Koh, Woon Senn
McGregor, Alison H.
author_facet Papi, Enrica
Koh, Woon Senn
McGregor, Alison H.
author_sort Papi, Enrica
collection PubMed
description Continuous monitoring of spine movement function could enhance our understanding of low back pain development. Wearable technologies have gained popularity as promising alternative to laboratory systems in allowing ambulatory movement analysis. This paper aims to review the state of art of current use of wearable technology to assess spine kinematics and kinetics. Four electronic databases and reference lists of relevant articles were searched to find studies employing wearable technologies to assess the spine in adults performing dynamic movements. Two reviewers independently identified relevant papers. Customised data extraction and quality appraisal form were developed to extrapolate key details and identify risk of biases of each study. Twenty-two articles were retrieved that met the inclusion criteria: 12 were deemed of medium quality (score 33.4–66.7%), and 10 of high quality (score >66.8%). The majority of articles (19/22) reported validation type studies. Only 6 reported data collection in real-life environments. Multiple sensors type were used: electrogoniometers (3/22), strain gauges based sensors (3/22), textile piezoresistive sensor (1/22) and accelerometers often used with gyroscopes and magnetometers (15/22). Two sensors units were mainly used and placing was commonly reported on the spine lumbar and sacral regions. The sensors were often wired to data transmitter/logger resulting in cumbersome systems. Outcomes were mostly reported relative to the lumbar segment and in the sagittal plane, including angles, range of motion, angular velocity, joint moments and forces. This review demonstrates the applicability of wearable technology to assess the spine, although this technique is still at an early stage of development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5700811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57008112017-12-01 Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review Papi, Enrica Koh, Woon Senn McGregor, Alison H. J Biomech Article Continuous monitoring of spine movement function could enhance our understanding of low back pain development. Wearable technologies have gained popularity as promising alternative to laboratory systems in allowing ambulatory movement analysis. This paper aims to review the state of art of current use of wearable technology to assess spine kinematics and kinetics. Four electronic databases and reference lists of relevant articles were searched to find studies employing wearable technologies to assess the spine in adults performing dynamic movements. Two reviewers independently identified relevant papers. Customised data extraction and quality appraisal form were developed to extrapolate key details and identify risk of biases of each study. Twenty-two articles were retrieved that met the inclusion criteria: 12 were deemed of medium quality (score 33.4–66.7%), and 10 of high quality (score >66.8%). The majority of articles (19/22) reported validation type studies. Only 6 reported data collection in real-life environments. Multiple sensors type were used: electrogoniometers (3/22), strain gauges based sensors (3/22), textile piezoresistive sensor (1/22) and accelerometers often used with gyroscopes and magnetometers (15/22). Two sensors units were mainly used and placing was commonly reported on the spine lumbar and sacral regions. The sensors were often wired to data transmitter/logger resulting in cumbersome systems. Outcomes were mostly reported relative to the lumbar segment and in the sagittal plane, including angles, range of motion, angular velocity, joint moments and forces. This review demonstrates the applicability of wearable technology to assess the spine, although this technique is still at an early stage of development. Elsevier Science 2017-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5700811/ /pubmed/29102267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.037 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Papi, Enrica
Koh, Woon Senn
McGregor, Alison H.
Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review
title Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review
title_full Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review
title_fullStr Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review
title_short Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review
title_sort wearable technology for spine movement assessment: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29102267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.037
work_keys_str_mv AT papienrica wearabletechnologyforspinemovementassessmentasystematicreview
AT kohwoonsenn wearabletechnologyforspinemovementassessmentasystematicreview
AT mcgregoralisonh wearabletechnologyforspinemovementassessmentasystematicreview