Cargando…
Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke
Modulating visual feedback may be a viable option to improve motor function after stroke, but the neurophysiological basis for this improvement is not clear. Visual gain can be manipulated by increasing or decreasing the spatial amplitude of an error signal. Here, we combined a unilateral visually g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.012 |
_version_ | 1783281205674770432 |
---|---|
author | Archer, Derek B. Kang, Nyeonju Misra, Gaurav Marble, Shannon Patten, Carolynn Coombes, Stephen A. |
author_facet | Archer, Derek B. Kang, Nyeonju Misra, Gaurav Marble, Shannon Patten, Carolynn Coombes, Stephen A. |
author_sort | Archer, Derek B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modulating visual feedback may be a viable option to improve motor function after stroke, but the neurophysiological basis for this improvement is not clear. Visual gain can be manipulated by increasing or decreasing the spatial amplitude of an error signal. Here, we combined a unilateral visually guided grip force task with functional MRI to understand how changes in the gain of visual feedback alter brain activity in the chronic phase after stroke. Analyses focused on brain activation when force was produced by the most impaired hand of the stroke group as compared to the non-dominant hand of the control group. Our experiment produced three novel results. First, gain-related improvements in force control were associated with an increase in activity in many regions within the visuomotor network in both the stroke and control groups. These regions include the extrastriate visual cortex, inferior parietal lobule, ventral premotor cortex, cerebellum, and supplementary motor area. Second, the stroke group showed gain-related increases in activity in additional regions of lobules VI and VIIb of the ipsilateral cerebellum. Third, relative to the control group, the stroke group showed increased activity in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex, and activity in this region did not vary as a function of visual feedback gain. The visuomotor network, cerebellum, and ipsilateral primary motor cortex have each been targeted in rehabilitation interventions after stroke. Our observations provide new insight into the role these regions play in processing visual gain during a precisely controlled visuomotor task in the chronic phase after stroke. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5700823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57008232017-12-01 Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke Archer, Derek B. Kang, Nyeonju Misra, Gaurav Marble, Shannon Patten, Carolynn Coombes, Stephen A. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Modulating visual feedback may be a viable option to improve motor function after stroke, but the neurophysiological basis for this improvement is not clear. Visual gain can be manipulated by increasing or decreasing the spatial amplitude of an error signal. Here, we combined a unilateral visually guided grip force task with functional MRI to understand how changes in the gain of visual feedback alter brain activity in the chronic phase after stroke. Analyses focused on brain activation when force was produced by the most impaired hand of the stroke group as compared to the non-dominant hand of the control group. Our experiment produced three novel results. First, gain-related improvements in force control were associated with an increase in activity in many regions within the visuomotor network in both the stroke and control groups. These regions include the extrastriate visual cortex, inferior parietal lobule, ventral premotor cortex, cerebellum, and supplementary motor area. Second, the stroke group showed gain-related increases in activity in additional regions of lobules VI and VIIb of the ipsilateral cerebellum. Third, relative to the control group, the stroke group showed increased activity in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex, and activity in this region did not vary as a function of visual feedback gain. The visuomotor network, cerebellum, and ipsilateral primary motor cortex have each been targeted in rehabilitation interventions after stroke. Our observations provide new insight into the role these regions play in processing visual gain during a precisely controlled visuomotor task in the chronic phase after stroke. Elsevier 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5700823/ /pubmed/29201639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.012 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Archer, Derek B. Kang, Nyeonju Misra, Gaurav Marble, Shannon Patten, Carolynn Coombes, Stephen A. Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke |
title | Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke |
title_full | Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke |
title_fullStr | Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke |
title_short | Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke |
title_sort | visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT archerderekb visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke AT kangnyeonju visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke AT misragaurav visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke AT marbleshannon visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke AT pattencarolynn visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke AT coombesstephena visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke |