Cargando…

Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke

Modulating visual feedback may be a viable option to improve motor function after stroke, but the neurophysiological basis for this improvement is not clear. Visual gain can be manipulated by increasing or decreasing the spatial amplitude of an error signal. Here, we combined a unilateral visually g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Archer, Derek B., Kang, Nyeonju, Misra, Gaurav, Marble, Shannon, Patten, Carolynn, Coombes, Stephen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.012
_version_ 1783281205674770432
author Archer, Derek B.
Kang, Nyeonju
Misra, Gaurav
Marble, Shannon
Patten, Carolynn
Coombes, Stephen A.
author_facet Archer, Derek B.
Kang, Nyeonju
Misra, Gaurav
Marble, Shannon
Patten, Carolynn
Coombes, Stephen A.
author_sort Archer, Derek B.
collection PubMed
description Modulating visual feedback may be a viable option to improve motor function after stroke, but the neurophysiological basis for this improvement is not clear. Visual gain can be manipulated by increasing or decreasing the spatial amplitude of an error signal. Here, we combined a unilateral visually guided grip force task with functional MRI to understand how changes in the gain of visual feedback alter brain activity in the chronic phase after stroke. Analyses focused on brain activation when force was produced by the most impaired hand of the stroke group as compared to the non-dominant hand of the control group. Our experiment produced three novel results. First, gain-related improvements in force control were associated with an increase in activity in many regions within the visuomotor network in both the stroke and control groups. These regions include the extrastriate visual cortex, inferior parietal lobule, ventral premotor cortex, cerebellum, and supplementary motor area. Second, the stroke group showed gain-related increases in activity in additional regions of lobules VI and VIIb of the ipsilateral cerebellum. Third, relative to the control group, the stroke group showed increased activity in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex, and activity in this region did not vary as a function of visual feedback gain. The visuomotor network, cerebellum, and ipsilateral primary motor cortex have each been targeted in rehabilitation interventions after stroke. Our observations provide new insight into the role these regions play in processing visual gain during a precisely controlled visuomotor task in the chronic phase after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5700823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57008232017-12-01 Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke Archer, Derek B. Kang, Nyeonju Misra, Gaurav Marble, Shannon Patten, Carolynn Coombes, Stephen A. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Modulating visual feedback may be a viable option to improve motor function after stroke, but the neurophysiological basis for this improvement is not clear. Visual gain can be manipulated by increasing or decreasing the spatial amplitude of an error signal. Here, we combined a unilateral visually guided grip force task with functional MRI to understand how changes in the gain of visual feedback alter brain activity in the chronic phase after stroke. Analyses focused on brain activation when force was produced by the most impaired hand of the stroke group as compared to the non-dominant hand of the control group. Our experiment produced three novel results. First, gain-related improvements in force control were associated with an increase in activity in many regions within the visuomotor network in both the stroke and control groups. These regions include the extrastriate visual cortex, inferior parietal lobule, ventral premotor cortex, cerebellum, and supplementary motor area. Second, the stroke group showed gain-related increases in activity in additional regions of lobules VI and VIIb of the ipsilateral cerebellum. Third, relative to the control group, the stroke group showed increased activity in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex, and activity in this region did not vary as a function of visual feedback gain. The visuomotor network, cerebellum, and ipsilateral primary motor cortex have each been targeted in rehabilitation interventions after stroke. Our observations provide new insight into the role these regions play in processing visual gain during a precisely controlled visuomotor task in the chronic phase after stroke. Elsevier 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5700823/ /pubmed/29201639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.012 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Archer, Derek B.
Kang, Nyeonju
Misra, Gaurav
Marble, Shannon
Patten, Carolynn
Coombes, Stephen A.
Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke
title Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke
title_full Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke
title_fullStr Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke
title_full_unstemmed Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke
title_short Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke
title_sort visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5700823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.012
work_keys_str_mv AT archerderekb visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke
AT kangnyeonju visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke
AT misragaurav visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke
AT marbleshannon visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke
AT pattencarolynn visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke
AT coombesstephena visualfeedbackaltersforcecontrolandfunctionalactivityinthevisuomotornetworkafterstroke