Cargando…

Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions?

Species with similar ecological requirements coexisting in the same geographic region are prone to competitively exclude each other. Alternatively, they may coexist if character displacement acts to change the niche requirements of one or both species. We used two methodological approaches (ecologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubiak, Bruno B., Gutiérrez, Eliécer E., Galiano, Daniel, Maestri, Renan, Freitas, Thales R. O. de
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29176709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16243-2
_version_ 1783281270627762176
author Kubiak, Bruno B.
Gutiérrez, Eliécer E.
Galiano, Daniel
Maestri, Renan
Freitas, Thales R. O. de
author_facet Kubiak, Bruno B.
Gutiérrez, Eliécer E.
Galiano, Daniel
Maestri, Renan
Freitas, Thales R. O. de
author_sort Kubiak, Bruno B.
collection PubMed
description Species with similar ecological requirements coexisting in the same geographic region are prone to competitively exclude each other. Alternatively, they may coexist if character displacement acts to change the niche requirements of one or both species. We used two methodological approaches (ecological niche modeling [ENM] and geometric morphometrics) to test two hypotheses: given their behavioral, morphological, and ecological similarities, one species competitively excludes the other; and, character displacement enables their coexistence at two sites in which the species are known to occur in sympatry. The results from the ENM-based approach did not provide evidence for competitive exclusion; however, the morphometric analyses documented displacement in size of C. minutus. This result, suggests that C. minutus might exclude C. flamarioni from areas with softer soils and higher food availability. We stress the importance of using multiple methodological approaches when testing prediction of competitive exclusion. However, both methods had limited explanatory power given that the focal species possess truly peculiar distributions, being largely parapatric and restricted to narrow, small geographic areas with a strange distribution and there is a need to search for additional methods. We discuss the idiosyncrasy of the ENM-based approach when applied to organisms with subterranean habits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5701118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57011182017-11-30 Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions? Kubiak, Bruno B. Gutiérrez, Eliécer E. Galiano, Daniel Maestri, Renan Freitas, Thales R. O. de Sci Rep Article Species with similar ecological requirements coexisting in the same geographic region are prone to competitively exclude each other. Alternatively, they may coexist if character displacement acts to change the niche requirements of one or both species. We used two methodological approaches (ecological niche modeling [ENM] and geometric morphometrics) to test two hypotheses: given their behavioral, morphological, and ecological similarities, one species competitively excludes the other; and, character displacement enables their coexistence at two sites in which the species are known to occur in sympatry. The results from the ENM-based approach did not provide evidence for competitive exclusion; however, the morphometric analyses documented displacement in size of C. minutus. This result, suggests that C. minutus might exclude C. flamarioni from areas with softer soils and higher food availability. We stress the importance of using multiple methodological approaches when testing prediction of competitive exclusion. However, both methods had limited explanatory power given that the focal species possess truly peculiar distributions, being largely parapatric and restricted to narrow, small geographic areas with a strange distribution and there is a need to search for additional methods. We discuss the idiosyncrasy of the ENM-based approach when applied to organisms with subterranean habits. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5701118/ /pubmed/29176709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16243-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kubiak, Bruno B.
Gutiérrez, Eliécer E.
Galiano, Daniel
Maestri, Renan
Freitas, Thales R. O. de
Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions?
title Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions?
title_full Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions?
title_fullStr Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions?
title_full_unstemmed Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions?
title_short Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions?
title_sort can niche modeling and geometric morphometrics document competitive exclusion in a pair of subterranean rodents (genus ctenomys) with tiny parapatric distributions?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29176709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16243-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kubiakbrunob cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions
AT gutierrezeliecere cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions
AT galianodaniel cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions
AT maestrirenan cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions
AT freitasthalesrode cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions