Cargando…
Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions?
Species with similar ecological requirements coexisting in the same geographic region are prone to competitively exclude each other. Alternatively, they may coexist if character displacement acts to change the niche requirements of one or both species. We used two methodological approaches (ecologic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29176709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16243-2 |
_version_ | 1783281270627762176 |
---|---|
author | Kubiak, Bruno B. Gutiérrez, Eliécer E. Galiano, Daniel Maestri, Renan Freitas, Thales R. O. de |
author_facet | Kubiak, Bruno B. Gutiérrez, Eliécer E. Galiano, Daniel Maestri, Renan Freitas, Thales R. O. de |
author_sort | Kubiak, Bruno B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Species with similar ecological requirements coexisting in the same geographic region are prone to competitively exclude each other. Alternatively, they may coexist if character displacement acts to change the niche requirements of one or both species. We used two methodological approaches (ecological niche modeling [ENM] and geometric morphometrics) to test two hypotheses: given their behavioral, morphological, and ecological similarities, one species competitively excludes the other; and, character displacement enables their coexistence at two sites in which the species are known to occur in sympatry. The results from the ENM-based approach did not provide evidence for competitive exclusion; however, the morphometric analyses documented displacement in size of C. minutus. This result, suggests that C. minutus might exclude C. flamarioni from areas with softer soils and higher food availability. We stress the importance of using multiple methodological approaches when testing prediction of competitive exclusion. However, both methods had limited explanatory power given that the focal species possess truly peculiar distributions, being largely parapatric and restricted to narrow, small geographic areas with a strange distribution and there is a need to search for additional methods. We discuss the idiosyncrasy of the ENM-based approach when applied to organisms with subterranean habits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5701118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57011182017-11-30 Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions? Kubiak, Bruno B. Gutiérrez, Eliécer E. Galiano, Daniel Maestri, Renan Freitas, Thales R. O. de Sci Rep Article Species with similar ecological requirements coexisting in the same geographic region are prone to competitively exclude each other. Alternatively, they may coexist if character displacement acts to change the niche requirements of one or both species. We used two methodological approaches (ecological niche modeling [ENM] and geometric morphometrics) to test two hypotheses: given their behavioral, morphological, and ecological similarities, one species competitively excludes the other; and, character displacement enables their coexistence at two sites in which the species are known to occur in sympatry. The results from the ENM-based approach did not provide evidence for competitive exclusion; however, the morphometric analyses documented displacement in size of C. minutus. This result, suggests that C. minutus might exclude C. flamarioni from areas with softer soils and higher food availability. We stress the importance of using multiple methodological approaches when testing prediction of competitive exclusion. However, both methods had limited explanatory power given that the focal species possess truly peculiar distributions, being largely parapatric and restricted to narrow, small geographic areas with a strange distribution and there is a need to search for additional methods. We discuss the idiosyncrasy of the ENM-based approach when applied to organisms with subterranean habits. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5701118/ /pubmed/29176709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16243-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kubiak, Bruno B. Gutiérrez, Eliécer E. Galiano, Daniel Maestri, Renan Freitas, Thales R. O. de Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions? |
title | Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions? |
title_full | Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions? |
title_fullStr | Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions? |
title_short | Can Niche Modeling and Geometric Morphometrics Document Competitive Exclusion in a Pair of Subterranean Rodents (Genus Ctenomys) with Tiny Parapatric Distributions? |
title_sort | can niche modeling and geometric morphometrics document competitive exclusion in a pair of subterranean rodents (genus ctenomys) with tiny parapatric distributions? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29176709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16243-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kubiakbrunob cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions AT gutierrezeliecere cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions AT galianodaniel cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions AT maestrirenan cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions AT freitasthalesrode cannichemodelingandgeometricmorphometricsdocumentcompetitiveexclusioninapairofsubterraneanrodentsgenusctenomyswithtinyparapatricdistributions |