Cargando…

No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations

Ant queens often associate to found new colonies, yet the benefits of this behaviour remain unclear. A major hypothesis is that queens founding in groups are protected by social immunity and can better resist disease than solitary queens, due to mutual grooming, sharing of antimicrobials, or higher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brütsch, Timothée, Avril, Amaury, Chapuisat, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29176649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16368-4
_version_ 1783281297521639424
author Brütsch, Timothée
Avril, Amaury
Chapuisat, Michel
author_facet Brütsch, Timothée
Avril, Amaury
Chapuisat, Michel
author_sort Brütsch, Timothée
collection PubMed
description Ant queens often associate to found new colonies, yet the benefits of this behaviour remain unclear. A major hypothesis is that queens founding in groups are protected by social immunity and can better resist disease than solitary queens, due to mutual grooming, sharing of antimicrobials, or higher genetic diversity among their workers. We tested this hypothesis by manipulating the number of queens in incipient colonies of Lasius niger and measuring their resistance to the fungal entomopathogen Metarhizium brunneum. We found no evidence for social immunity in associations of founding queens. First, co-founding queens engaged in self-grooming, but performed very little allo-grooming or trophallaxis. Second, co-founding queens did not exhibit higher pathogen resistance than solitary queens, and their respective workers did not differ in disease resistance. Finally, queens founding in groups increased their investment in a component of individual immunity, as expected if they do not benefit from social immunity but respond to a higher risk of disease. Overall, our results provide no evidence that joint colony founding by L. niger queens increases their ability to resist fungal pathogens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5701228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57012282017-11-30 No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations Brütsch, Timothée Avril, Amaury Chapuisat, Michel Sci Rep Article Ant queens often associate to found new colonies, yet the benefits of this behaviour remain unclear. A major hypothesis is that queens founding in groups are protected by social immunity and can better resist disease than solitary queens, due to mutual grooming, sharing of antimicrobials, or higher genetic diversity among their workers. We tested this hypothesis by manipulating the number of queens in incipient colonies of Lasius niger and measuring their resistance to the fungal entomopathogen Metarhizium brunneum. We found no evidence for social immunity in associations of founding queens. First, co-founding queens engaged in self-grooming, but performed very little allo-grooming or trophallaxis. Second, co-founding queens did not exhibit higher pathogen resistance than solitary queens, and their respective workers did not differ in disease resistance. Finally, queens founding in groups increased their investment in a component of individual immunity, as expected if they do not benefit from social immunity but respond to a higher risk of disease. Overall, our results provide no evidence that joint colony founding by L. niger queens increases their ability to resist fungal pathogens. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5701228/ /pubmed/29176649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16368-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Brütsch, Timothée
Avril, Amaury
Chapuisat, Michel
No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations
title No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations
title_full No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations
title_fullStr No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations
title_short No evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations
title_sort no evidence for social immunity in co-founding queen associations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29176649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16368-4
work_keys_str_mv AT brutschtimothee noevidenceforsocialimmunityincofoundingqueenassociations
AT avrilamaury noevidenceforsocialimmunityincofoundingqueenassociations
AT chapuisatmichel noevidenceforsocialimmunityincofoundingqueenassociations