Cargando…
Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: One of the key strategies to successful implementation of effective health-related interventions is targeting improvements in stakeholder engagement. The discrete choice experiment (DCE) is a stated preference technique for eliciting individual preferences over hypothetical alternative s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29169397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8 |
_version_ | 1783281325880377344 |
---|---|
author | Salloum, Ramzi G. Shenkman, Elizabeth A. Louviere, Jordan J. Chambers, David A. |
author_facet | Salloum, Ramzi G. Shenkman, Elizabeth A. Louviere, Jordan J. Chambers, David A. |
author_sort | Salloum, Ramzi G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One of the key strategies to successful implementation of effective health-related interventions is targeting improvements in stakeholder engagement. The discrete choice experiment (DCE) is a stated preference technique for eliciting individual preferences over hypothetical alternative scenarios that is increasingly being used in health-related applications. DCEs are a dynamic approach to systematically measure health preferences which can be applied in enhancing stakeholder engagement. However, a knowledge gap exists in characterizing the extent to which DCEs are used in implementation science. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search (up to December 2016) of the English literature to identify and describe the use of DCEs in engaging stakeholders as an implementation strategy. We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Econlit, PsychINFO, and the CINAHL using mesh terms. Studies were categorized according to application type, stakeholder(s), healthcare setting, and implementation outcome. RESULTS: Seventy-five publications were selected for analysis in this systematic review. Studies were categorized by application type: (1) characterizing demand for therapies and treatment technologies (n = 32), (2) comparing implementation strategies (n = 22), (3) incentivizing workforce participation (n = 11), and (4) prioritizing interventions (n = 10). Stakeholders included providers (n = 27), patients (n = 25), caregivers (n = 5), and administrators (n = 2). The remaining studies (n = 16) engaged multiple stakeholders (i.e., combination of patients, caregivers, providers, and/or administrators). The following implementation outcomes were discussed: acceptability (n = 75), appropriateness (n = 34), adoption (n = 19), feasibility (n = 16), and fidelity (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: The number of DCE studies engaging stakeholders as an implementation strategy has been increasing over the past decade. As DCEs are more widely used as a healthcare assessment tool, there is a wide range of applications for them in stakeholder engagement. The DCE approach could serve as a tool for engaging stakeholders in implementation science. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5701380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57013802017-12-01 Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review Salloum, Ramzi G. Shenkman, Elizabeth A. Louviere, Jordan J. Chambers, David A. Implement Sci Systematic Review BACKGROUND: One of the key strategies to successful implementation of effective health-related interventions is targeting improvements in stakeholder engagement. The discrete choice experiment (DCE) is a stated preference technique for eliciting individual preferences over hypothetical alternative scenarios that is increasingly being used in health-related applications. DCEs are a dynamic approach to systematically measure health preferences which can be applied in enhancing stakeholder engagement. However, a knowledge gap exists in characterizing the extent to which DCEs are used in implementation science. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search (up to December 2016) of the English literature to identify and describe the use of DCEs in engaging stakeholders as an implementation strategy. We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Econlit, PsychINFO, and the CINAHL using mesh terms. Studies were categorized according to application type, stakeholder(s), healthcare setting, and implementation outcome. RESULTS: Seventy-five publications were selected for analysis in this systematic review. Studies were categorized by application type: (1) characterizing demand for therapies and treatment technologies (n = 32), (2) comparing implementation strategies (n = 22), (3) incentivizing workforce participation (n = 11), and (4) prioritizing interventions (n = 10). Stakeholders included providers (n = 27), patients (n = 25), caregivers (n = 5), and administrators (n = 2). The remaining studies (n = 16) engaged multiple stakeholders (i.e., combination of patients, caregivers, providers, and/or administrators). The following implementation outcomes were discussed: acceptability (n = 75), appropriateness (n = 34), adoption (n = 19), feasibility (n = 16), and fidelity (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: The number of DCE studies engaging stakeholders as an implementation strategy has been increasing over the past decade. As DCEs are more widely used as a healthcare assessment tool, there is a wide range of applications for them in stakeholder engagement. The DCE approach could serve as a tool for engaging stakeholders in implementation science. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5701380/ /pubmed/29169397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Salloum, Ramzi G. Shenkman, Elizabeth A. Louviere, Jordan J. Chambers, David A. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review |
title | Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review |
title_full | Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review |
title_short | Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review |
title_sort | application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29169397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salloumramzig applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentstoenhancestakeholderengagementasastrategyforadvancingimplementationasystematicreview AT shenkmanelizabetha applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentstoenhancestakeholderengagementasastrategyforadvancingimplementationasystematicreview AT louvierejordanj applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentstoenhancestakeholderengagementasastrategyforadvancingimplementationasystematicreview AT chambersdavida applicationofdiscretechoiceexperimentstoenhancestakeholderengagementasastrategyforadvancingimplementationasystematicreview |