Cargando…
Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings
Although mechanical ventilation is a life-saving strategy in critically ill patients and an indispensable tool in patients under general anesthesia for surgery, it also acts as a double-edged sword. Indeed, ventilation is increasingly recognized as a potentially dangerous intrusion that has the pote...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29250319 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12225.1 |
_version_ | 1783281340751282176 |
---|---|
author | Alencar, Roger D'Angelo, Vittorio Carmona, Rachel Schultz, Marcus J Serpa Neto, Ary |
author_facet | Alencar, Roger D'Angelo, Vittorio Carmona, Rachel Schultz, Marcus J Serpa Neto, Ary |
author_sort | Alencar, Roger |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although mechanical ventilation is a life-saving strategy in critically ill patients and an indispensable tool in patients under general anesthesia for surgery, it also acts as a double-edged sword. Indeed, ventilation is increasingly recognized as a potentially dangerous intrusion that has the potential to harm lungs, in a condition known as ‘ventilator-induced lung injury’ (VILI). So-called ‘lung-protective’ ventilator settings aiming at prevention of VILI have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and, over the last few years, there has been increasing interest in possible benefit of lung-protective ventilation in patients under ventilation for reasons other than ARDS. Patients without ARDS could benefit from tidal volume reduction during mechanical ventilation. However, it is uncertain whether higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressure could benefit these patients as well. Finally, recent evidence suggests that patients without ARDS should receive low driving pressures during ventilation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5701436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57014362017-12-14 Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings Alencar, Roger D'Angelo, Vittorio Carmona, Rachel Schultz, Marcus J Serpa Neto, Ary F1000Res Review Although mechanical ventilation is a life-saving strategy in critically ill patients and an indispensable tool in patients under general anesthesia for surgery, it also acts as a double-edged sword. Indeed, ventilation is increasingly recognized as a potentially dangerous intrusion that has the potential to harm lungs, in a condition known as ‘ventilator-induced lung injury’ (VILI). So-called ‘lung-protective’ ventilator settings aiming at prevention of VILI have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and, over the last few years, there has been increasing interest in possible benefit of lung-protective ventilation in patients under ventilation for reasons other than ARDS. Patients without ARDS could benefit from tidal volume reduction during mechanical ventilation. However, it is uncertain whether higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressure could benefit these patients as well. Finally, recent evidence suggests that patients without ARDS should receive low driving pressures during ventilation. F1000 Research Limited 2017-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5701436/ /pubmed/29250319 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12225.1 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Alencar R et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Alencar, Roger D'Angelo, Vittorio Carmona, Rachel Schultz, Marcus J Serpa Neto, Ary Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings |
title | Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings |
title_full | Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings |
title_fullStr | Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings |
title_short | Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings |
title_sort | patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29250319 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12225.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alencarroger patientswithuninjuredlungsmayalsobenefitfromlungprotectiveventilatorsettings AT dangelovittorio patientswithuninjuredlungsmayalsobenefitfromlungprotectiveventilatorsettings AT carmonarachel patientswithuninjuredlungsmayalsobenefitfromlungprotectiveventilatorsettings AT schultzmarcusj patientswithuninjuredlungsmayalsobenefitfromlungprotectiveventilatorsettings AT serpanetoary patientswithuninjuredlungsmayalsobenefitfromlungprotectiveventilatorsettings |