Cargando…
The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour
BACKGROUND: Laying hens are often kept in barn or free-range systems where they must negotiate level changes in the house to access resources. However, collisions and resultant keel fractures are commonplace. Producers sometimes add ramps to make raised areas more accessible but designs vary and ver...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177116 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4069 |
_version_ | 1783281362875187200 |
---|---|
author | Pettersson, Isabelle C. Weeks, Claire A. Norman, Kate I. Nicol, Christine J. |
author_facet | Pettersson, Isabelle C. Weeks, Claire A. Norman, Kate I. Nicol, Christine J. |
author_sort | Pettersson, Isabelle C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laying hens are often kept in barn or free-range systems where they must negotiate level changes in the house to access resources. However, collisions and resultant keel fractures are commonplace. Producers sometimes add ramps to make raised areas more accessible but designs vary and very little research has investigated bird preference or behaviour when using different ramp designs, or the effect of ramp design on falls and collisions. METHODS: Two ramp designs were studied in an experimental setting—a ramp made of plastic poultry slats (grid ramp, GR) and a ramp made of wooden rungs (ladder ramp, LR). Sixty-four young female hens were trained to move to a food reward and this was used to test their behavioural responses when first negotiating the two different ramps during individual tests. Both upward and downward transitions were studied. Ramp preference was also tested using a room that replicated a commercial single-tier system with both types of ramp available. Birds were placed in this room in groups of 16 for three days and their use of the ramps studied. RESULTS: A greater percentage of birds successfully completed (reached the reward bowl) on the GR than the LR during both upward (58% vs 37%) and downward (83% vs 73%) transitions, and a smaller percentage of birds made zero attempts to use the GR than the LR (upwards: 13% vs 56%, downwards: 8% vs 26%). When making a downward transition, more hesitation behaviours were seen (head orientations, stepping on the spot, moving away) for the LR. However, more head orientations were seen for the GR during the upward transition. Birds were more likely to abort attempts (an attempt began when a bird placed both feet on the ramp) to move up the GR than the LR. Birds took longer to negotiate the LR than the GR in both directions, and more pauses were seen during a successful upward transition on the LR. Birds were more likely to move down the GR by walking/running whereas birds tended to jump over the entire LR. More collisions with the food reward bowl were seen for the LR. In the group tests, birds preferred to use the GR, with more transitions seen at all timepoints. However, in these tests, birds preferred to rest on the LR with greater numbers of birds counted on this type of ramp during scan sampling at all timepoints. DISCUSSION: Behavioural results suggest that the GR was easier for the birds to use than the LR, particularly on the downward transition. The GR was also less likely to result in collisions. However, the upward transition may be more difficult on the GR for some birds, potentially because of the inability to pause on a level surface during the transition. The results suggest that the GR was preferred by pullets for moving between a raised area and the ground but the LR was preferred for resting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5701544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57015442017-11-24 The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour Pettersson, Isabelle C. Weeks, Claire A. Norman, Kate I. Nicol, Christine J. PeerJ Animal Behavior BACKGROUND: Laying hens are often kept in barn or free-range systems where they must negotiate level changes in the house to access resources. However, collisions and resultant keel fractures are commonplace. Producers sometimes add ramps to make raised areas more accessible but designs vary and very little research has investigated bird preference or behaviour when using different ramp designs, or the effect of ramp design on falls and collisions. METHODS: Two ramp designs were studied in an experimental setting—a ramp made of plastic poultry slats (grid ramp, GR) and a ramp made of wooden rungs (ladder ramp, LR). Sixty-four young female hens were trained to move to a food reward and this was used to test their behavioural responses when first negotiating the two different ramps during individual tests. Both upward and downward transitions were studied. Ramp preference was also tested using a room that replicated a commercial single-tier system with both types of ramp available. Birds were placed in this room in groups of 16 for three days and their use of the ramps studied. RESULTS: A greater percentage of birds successfully completed (reached the reward bowl) on the GR than the LR during both upward (58% vs 37%) and downward (83% vs 73%) transitions, and a smaller percentage of birds made zero attempts to use the GR than the LR (upwards: 13% vs 56%, downwards: 8% vs 26%). When making a downward transition, more hesitation behaviours were seen (head orientations, stepping on the spot, moving away) for the LR. However, more head orientations were seen for the GR during the upward transition. Birds were more likely to abort attempts (an attempt began when a bird placed both feet on the ramp) to move up the GR than the LR. Birds took longer to negotiate the LR than the GR in both directions, and more pauses were seen during a successful upward transition on the LR. Birds were more likely to move down the GR by walking/running whereas birds tended to jump over the entire LR. More collisions with the food reward bowl were seen for the LR. In the group tests, birds preferred to use the GR, with more transitions seen at all timepoints. However, in these tests, birds preferred to rest on the LR with greater numbers of birds counted on this type of ramp during scan sampling at all timepoints. DISCUSSION: Behavioural results suggest that the GR was easier for the birds to use than the LR, particularly on the downward transition. The GR was also less likely to result in collisions. However, the upward transition may be more difficult on the GR for some birds, potentially because of the inability to pause on a level surface during the transition. The results suggest that the GR was preferred by pullets for moving between a raised area and the ground but the LR was preferred for resting. PeerJ Inc. 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5701544/ /pubmed/29177116 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4069 Text en ©2017 Pettersson et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behavior Pettersson, Isabelle C. Weeks, Claire A. Norman, Kate I. Nicol, Christine J. The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour |
title | The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour |
title_full | The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour |
title_fullStr | The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour |
title_full_unstemmed | The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour |
title_short | The ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour |
title_sort | ability of laying pullets to negotiate two ramp designs as measured by bird preference and behaviour |
topic | Animal Behavior |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177116 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petterssonisabellec theabilityoflayingpulletstonegotiatetworampdesignsasmeasuredbybirdpreferenceandbehaviour AT weeksclairea theabilityoflayingpulletstonegotiatetworampdesignsasmeasuredbybirdpreferenceandbehaviour AT normankatei theabilityoflayingpulletstonegotiatetworampdesignsasmeasuredbybirdpreferenceandbehaviour AT nicolchristinej theabilityoflayingpulletstonegotiatetworampdesignsasmeasuredbybirdpreferenceandbehaviour AT petterssonisabellec abilityoflayingpulletstonegotiatetworampdesignsasmeasuredbybirdpreferenceandbehaviour AT weeksclairea abilityoflayingpulletstonegotiatetworampdesignsasmeasuredbybirdpreferenceandbehaviour AT normankatei abilityoflayingpulletstonegotiatetworampdesignsasmeasuredbybirdpreferenceandbehaviour AT nicolchristinej abilityoflayingpulletstonegotiatetworampdesignsasmeasuredbybirdpreferenceandbehaviour |