Cargando…
The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain
BACKGROUND: Epidural steroid injections (ESI) are the most common pain management procedure performed in the US, however evidence of efficacy is limited. In addition, there is early evidence that the high dose of corticosteroids used can have systemic side effects. We describe the results of a case...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-017-0113-5 |
_version_ | 1783281414215565312 |
---|---|
author | Centeno, Christopher Markle, Jason Dodson, Ehren Stemper, Ian Hyzy, Matthew Williams, Christopher Freeman, Michael |
author_facet | Centeno, Christopher Markle, Jason Dodson, Ehren Stemper, Ian Hyzy, Matthew Williams, Christopher Freeman, Michael |
author_sort | Centeno, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Epidural steroid injections (ESI) are the most common pain management procedure performed in the US, however evidence of efficacy is limited. In addition, there is early evidence that the high dose of corticosteroids used can have systemic side effects. We describe the results of a case series evaluating the use of platelet lysate (PL) epidural injections for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain as an alternative to corticosteroids. METHODS: Registry data was obtained for patients (N = 470) treated with PL epidural injections presenting with symptoms of lumbar radicular pain and MRI findings that were consistent with symptoms. Collected outcomes included numeric pain score (NPS), functional rating index (FRI), and a modified single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) rating. RESULTS: Patients treated with PL epidurals reported significantly lower (p < .0001) NPS and FRI change scores at all time points compared to baseline. Post-treatment FRI change score means exceeded the minimal clinically important difference beyond 1 month. Average modified SANE ratings showed 49.7% improvement at 24 months post-treatment. Twenty-nine (6.3%) patients reported mild adverse events related to treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with PL epidurals reported significant improvements in pain, exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for FRI, and reported subjective improvement through 2-year follow-up. PL may be a promising substitute for corticosteroid. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5701904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57019042017-12-04 The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain Centeno, Christopher Markle, Jason Dodson, Ehren Stemper, Ian Hyzy, Matthew Williams, Christopher Freeman, Michael J Exp Orthop Research BACKGROUND: Epidural steroid injections (ESI) are the most common pain management procedure performed in the US, however evidence of efficacy is limited. In addition, there is early evidence that the high dose of corticosteroids used can have systemic side effects. We describe the results of a case series evaluating the use of platelet lysate (PL) epidural injections for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain as an alternative to corticosteroids. METHODS: Registry data was obtained for patients (N = 470) treated with PL epidural injections presenting with symptoms of lumbar radicular pain and MRI findings that were consistent with symptoms. Collected outcomes included numeric pain score (NPS), functional rating index (FRI), and a modified single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) rating. RESULTS: Patients treated with PL epidurals reported significantly lower (p < .0001) NPS and FRI change scores at all time points compared to baseline. Post-treatment FRI change score means exceeded the minimal clinically important difference beyond 1 month. Average modified SANE ratings showed 49.7% improvement at 24 months post-treatment. Twenty-nine (6.3%) patients reported mild adverse events related to treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with PL epidurals reported significant improvements in pain, exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for FRI, and reported subjective improvement through 2-year follow-up. PL may be a promising substitute for corticosteroid. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5701904/ /pubmed/29177632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-017-0113-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Centeno, Christopher Markle, Jason Dodson, Ehren Stemper, Ian Hyzy, Matthew Williams, Christopher Freeman, Michael The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain |
title | The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain |
title_full | The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain |
title_fullStr | The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain |
title_short | The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain |
title_sort | use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-017-0113-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT centenochristopher theuseoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT marklejason theuseoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT dodsonehren theuseoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT stemperian theuseoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT hyzymatthew theuseoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT williamschristopher theuseoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT freemanmichael theuseoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT centenochristopher useoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT marklejason useoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT dodsonehren useoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT stemperian useoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT hyzymatthew useoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT williamschristopher useoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain AT freemanmichael useoflumbarepiduralinjectionofplateletlysatefortreatmentofradicularpain |