Cargando…

Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of a pilot study of an online consultation system in primary care. We describe who used the system, when and why, and the National Health Service costs associated with its use. DESIGN: 15-month observational study. SETTING: Primary care practices in South West England. RESULTS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Hannah B, Marques, Elsa, Hollingworth, William, Horwood, Jeremy, Farr, Michelle, Bernard, Elly, Salisbury, Chris, Northstone, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016901
_version_ 1783281432847712256
author Edwards, Hannah B
Marques, Elsa
Hollingworth, William
Horwood, Jeremy
Farr, Michelle
Bernard, Elly
Salisbury, Chris
Northstone, Kate
author_facet Edwards, Hannah B
Marques, Elsa
Hollingworth, William
Horwood, Jeremy
Farr, Michelle
Bernard, Elly
Salisbury, Chris
Northstone, Kate
author_sort Edwards, Hannah B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of a pilot study of an online consultation system in primary care. We describe who used the system, when and why, and the National Health Service costs associated with its use. DESIGN: 15-month observational study. SETTING: Primary care practices in South West England. RESULTS: 36 General practices covering 396 828 patients took part in the pilot. The online consultation website was viewed 35 981 times over the pilot period (mean 9.11 visits per 1000 patients per month). 7472 patients went on to complete an ‘e-consultation’ (mean 2.00 online consultations per 1000 patients per month). E-consultations were mainly performed on weekdays and during normal working hours. Patient records (n=485) were abstracted for eight practices and showed that women were more likely to use e-consultations than men (64.7% vs 35.3%) and users had a median age of 39 years (IQR 30–50). The most common reason for an e-consultation was an administrative request (eg, test results, letters and repeat prescriptions (22.5%)) followed by infections/immunological issues (14.4%). The majority of patients (65.2%) received a response within 2 days. The most common outcome was a face-to-face (38%) or telephone consultation (32%). The former were more often needed for patients consulting about new conditions (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.27, p=0.049). The average cost of a practice’s response to an e-consultation was £36.28, primarily triage time and resulting face-to-face/telephone consultations needed. CONCLUSIONS: Use of e-consultations is very low, particularly at weekends. Unless this can be improved, any impact on staff workload and patient waiting times is likely to be negligible. It is possible that use of e-consultations increases primary care workload and costs. Online consultation systems could be developed to improve efficiency both for staff and patients. These findings have implications for software developers as well as primary care services and policy-makers who are considering investing in online consultation systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5701981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57019812017-11-27 Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England Edwards, Hannah B Marques, Elsa Hollingworth, William Horwood, Jeremy Farr, Michelle Bernard, Elly Salisbury, Chris Northstone, Kate BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of a pilot study of an online consultation system in primary care. We describe who used the system, when and why, and the National Health Service costs associated with its use. DESIGN: 15-month observational study. SETTING: Primary care practices in South West England. RESULTS: 36 General practices covering 396 828 patients took part in the pilot. The online consultation website was viewed 35 981 times over the pilot period (mean 9.11 visits per 1000 patients per month). 7472 patients went on to complete an ‘e-consultation’ (mean 2.00 online consultations per 1000 patients per month). E-consultations were mainly performed on weekdays and during normal working hours. Patient records (n=485) were abstracted for eight practices and showed that women were more likely to use e-consultations than men (64.7% vs 35.3%) and users had a median age of 39 years (IQR 30–50). The most common reason for an e-consultation was an administrative request (eg, test results, letters and repeat prescriptions (22.5%)) followed by infections/immunological issues (14.4%). The majority of patients (65.2%) received a response within 2 days. The most common outcome was a face-to-face (38%) or telephone consultation (32%). The former were more often needed for patients consulting about new conditions (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.27, p=0.049). The average cost of a practice’s response to an e-consultation was £36.28, primarily triage time and resulting face-to-face/telephone consultations needed. CONCLUSIONS: Use of e-consultations is very low, particularly at weekends. Unless this can be improved, any impact on staff workload and patient waiting times is likely to be negligible. It is possible that use of e-consultations increases primary care workload and costs. Online consultation systems could be developed to improve efficiency both for staff and patients. These findings have implications for software developers as well as primary care services and policy-makers who are considering investing in online consultation systems. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5701981/ /pubmed/29167106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016901 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Edwards, Hannah B
Marques, Elsa
Hollingworth, William
Horwood, Jeremy
Farr, Michelle
Bernard, Elly
Salisbury, Chris
Northstone, Kate
Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England
title Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England
title_full Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England
title_fullStr Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England
title_full_unstemmed Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England
title_short Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England
title_sort use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in south west england
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016901
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardshannahb useofaprimarycareonlineconsultationsystembywhomwhenandwhyevaluationofapilotobservationalstudyin36generalpracticesinsouthwestengland
AT marqueselsa useofaprimarycareonlineconsultationsystembywhomwhenandwhyevaluationofapilotobservationalstudyin36generalpracticesinsouthwestengland
AT hollingworthwilliam useofaprimarycareonlineconsultationsystembywhomwhenandwhyevaluationofapilotobservationalstudyin36generalpracticesinsouthwestengland
AT horwoodjeremy useofaprimarycareonlineconsultationsystembywhomwhenandwhyevaluationofapilotobservationalstudyin36generalpracticesinsouthwestengland
AT farrmichelle useofaprimarycareonlineconsultationsystembywhomwhenandwhyevaluationofapilotobservationalstudyin36generalpracticesinsouthwestengland
AT bernardelly useofaprimarycareonlineconsultationsystembywhomwhenandwhyevaluationofapilotobservationalstudyin36generalpracticesinsouthwestengland
AT salisburychris useofaprimarycareonlineconsultationsystembywhomwhenandwhyevaluationofapilotobservationalstudyin36generalpracticesinsouthwestengland
AT northstonekate useofaprimarycareonlineconsultationsystembywhomwhenandwhyevaluationofapilotobservationalstudyin36generalpracticesinsouthwestengland