Cargando…
Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation
Exposure to underwater sound can cause permanent hearing loss and other physiological effects in marine animals. To reduce this risk, naval sonars are sometimes gradually increased in intensity at the start of transmission (‘ramp-up’). Here, we conducted experiments in which tagged humpback whales w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Company of Biologists Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.161232 |
_version_ | 1783281444694523904 |
---|---|
author | Wensveen, Paul J. Kvadsheim, Petter H. Lam, Frans-Peter A. von Benda-Beckmann, Alexander M. Sivle, Lise D. Visser, Fleur Curé, Charlotte Tyack, Peter L. Miller, Patrick J. O. |
author_facet | Wensveen, Paul J. Kvadsheim, Petter H. Lam, Frans-Peter A. von Benda-Beckmann, Alexander M. Sivle, Lise D. Visser, Fleur Curé, Charlotte Tyack, Peter L. Miller, Patrick J. O. |
author_sort | Wensveen, Paul J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Exposure to underwater sound can cause permanent hearing loss and other physiological effects in marine animals. To reduce this risk, naval sonars are sometimes gradually increased in intensity at the start of transmission (‘ramp-up’). Here, we conducted experiments in which tagged humpback whales were approached with a ship to test whether a sonar operation preceded by ramp-up reduced three risk indicators – maximum sound pressure level (SPL(max)), cumulative sound exposure level (SEL(cum)) and minimum source–whale range (R(min)) – compared with a sonar operation not preceded by ramp-up. Whales were subject to one no-sonar control session and either two successive ramp-up sessions (RampUp1, RampUp2) or a ramp-up session (RampUp1) and a full-power session (FullPower). Full-power sessions were conducted only twice; for other whales we used acoustic modelling that assumed transmission of the full-power sequence during their no-sonar control. Averaged over all whales, risk indicators in RampUp1 (n=11) differed significantly from those in FullPower (n=12) by −3.0 dB (SPL(max)), −2.0 dB (SEL(cum)) and +168 m (R(min)), but not significantly from those in RampUp2 (n=9). Only five whales in RampUp1, four whales in RampUp2 and none in FullPower or control sessions avoided the sound source. For RampUp1, we found statistically significant differences in risk indicators between whales that avoided the sonar and whales that did not: −4.7 dB (SPL(max)), −3.4 dB (SEL(cum)) and +291 m (R(min)). In contrast, for RampUp2, these differences were smaller and not significant. This study suggests that sonar ramp-up has a positive but limited mitigative effect for humpback whales overall, but that ramp-up can reduce the risk of harm more effectively in situations when animals are more responsive and likely to avoid the sonar, e.g. owing to novelty of the stimulus, when they are in the path of an approaching sonar ship. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5702040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Company of Biologists Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57020402017-12-06 Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation Wensveen, Paul J. Kvadsheim, Petter H. Lam, Frans-Peter A. von Benda-Beckmann, Alexander M. Sivle, Lise D. Visser, Fleur Curé, Charlotte Tyack, Peter L. Miller, Patrick J. O. J Exp Biol Research Article Exposure to underwater sound can cause permanent hearing loss and other physiological effects in marine animals. To reduce this risk, naval sonars are sometimes gradually increased in intensity at the start of transmission (‘ramp-up’). Here, we conducted experiments in which tagged humpback whales were approached with a ship to test whether a sonar operation preceded by ramp-up reduced three risk indicators – maximum sound pressure level (SPL(max)), cumulative sound exposure level (SEL(cum)) and minimum source–whale range (R(min)) – compared with a sonar operation not preceded by ramp-up. Whales were subject to one no-sonar control session and either two successive ramp-up sessions (RampUp1, RampUp2) or a ramp-up session (RampUp1) and a full-power session (FullPower). Full-power sessions were conducted only twice; for other whales we used acoustic modelling that assumed transmission of the full-power sequence during their no-sonar control. Averaged over all whales, risk indicators in RampUp1 (n=11) differed significantly from those in FullPower (n=12) by −3.0 dB (SPL(max)), −2.0 dB (SEL(cum)) and +168 m (R(min)), but not significantly from those in RampUp2 (n=9). Only five whales in RampUp1, four whales in RampUp2 and none in FullPower or control sessions avoided the sound source. For RampUp1, we found statistically significant differences in risk indicators between whales that avoided the sonar and whales that did not: −4.7 dB (SPL(max)), −3.4 dB (SEL(cum)) and +291 m (R(min)). In contrast, for RampUp2, these differences were smaller and not significant. This study suggests that sonar ramp-up has a positive but limited mitigative effect for humpback whales overall, but that ramp-up can reduce the risk of harm more effectively in situations when animals are more responsive and likely to avoid the sonar, e.g. owing to novelty of the stimulus, when they are in the path of an approaching sonar ship. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5702040/ /pubmed/29141878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.161232 Text en © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wensveen, Paul J. Kvadsheim, Petter H. Lam, Frans-Peter A. von Benda-Beckmann, Alexander M. Sivle, Lise D. Visser, Fleur Curé, Charlotte Tyack, Peter L. Miller, Patrick J. O. Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation |
title | Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation |
title_full | Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation |
title_fullStr | Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation |
title_short | Lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation |
title_sort | lack of behavioural responses of humpback whales (megaptera novaeangliae) indicate limited effectiveness of sonar mitigation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.161232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wensveenpaulj lackofbehaviouralresponsesofhumpbackwhalesmegapteranovaeangliaeindicatelimitedeffectivenessofsonarmitigation AT kvadsheimpetterh lackofbehaviouralresponsesofhumpbackwhalesmegapteranovaeangliaeindicatelimitedeffectivenessofsonarmitigation AT lamfranspetera lackofbehaviouralresponsesofhumpbackwhalesmegapteranovaeangliaeindicatelimitedeffectivenessofsonarmitigation AT vonbendabeckmannalexanderm lackofbehaviouralresponsesofhumpbackwhalesmegapteranovaeangliaeindicatelimitedeffectivenessofsonarmitigation AT sivlelised lackofbehaviouralresponsesofhumpbackwhalesmegapteranovaeangliaeindicatelimitedeffectivenessofsonarmitigation AT visserfleur lackofbehaviouralresponsesofhumpbackwhalesmegapteranovaeangliaeindicatelimitedeffectivenessofsonarmitigation AT curecharlotte lackofbehaviouralresponsesofhumpbackwhalesmegapteranovaeangliaeindicatelimitedeffectivenessofsonarmitigation AT tyackpeterl lackofbehaviouralresponsesofhumpbackwhalesmegapteranovaeangliaeindicatelimitedeffectivenessofsonarmitigation AT millerpatrickjo lackofbehaviouralresponsesofhumpbackwhalesmegapteranovaeangliaeindicatelimitedeffectivenessofsonarmitigation |