Cargando…
Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease
BACKGROUND: Performing a tick check after visiting nature is considered the most important preventive measure to avoid contracting Lyme disease. Checking the body for ticks after visiting nature is the only measure that can fully guarantee whether one has been bitten by a tick and provides the oppor...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1 |
_version_ | 1783281460921237504 |
---|---|
author | van der Heijden, Amy Mulder, Bob C. Poortvliet, P. Marijn van Vliet, Arnold J. H. |
author_facet | van der Heijden, Amy Mulder, Bob C. Poortvliet, P. Marijn van Vliet, Arnold J. H. |
author_sort | van der Heijden, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Performing a tick check after visiting nature is considered the most important preventive measure to avoid contracting Lyme disease. Checking the body for ticks after visiting nature is the only measure that can fully guarantee whether one has been bitten by a tick and provides the opportunity to remove the tick as soon as possible, thereby greatly reducing the chance of contracting Lyme disease. However, compliance to performing the tick check is low. In addition, most previous studies on determinants of preventive measures to avoid Lyme disease lack a clear definition and/or operationalization of the term “preventive measures”. Those that do distinguish multiple behaviors including the tick check, fail to describe the systematic steps that should be followed in order to perform the tick check effectively. Hence, the purpose of this study was to identify determinants of systematically performing the tick check, based on social cognitive theory. METHODS: A cross-sectional self-administered survey questionnaire was filled out online by 508 respondents (M(age) = 51.7, SD = 16.0; 50.2% men; 86.4% daily or weekly nature visitors). Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify associations between socio-cognitive determinants (i.e. concepts related to humans’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to perform certain behavior), and the tick check, and between socio-cognitive determinants and proximal goal to do the tick check. RESULTS: The full regression model explained 28% of the variance in doing the tick check. Results showed that performing the tick check was associated with proximal goal (β = .23, p < 0.01), self-efficacy (β = .22, p < 0.01), self-evaluative outcome expectations (β = .21, p < 0.01), descriptive norm (β = .16, p < 0.01), and experience (β = .13, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is among the first to examine the determinants of systematic performance of the tick check, using an extended version of social cognitive theory to identify determinants. Based on the results, a number of practical recommendations can be made to promote the performance of the tick check. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5702127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57021272017-12-04 Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease van der Heijden, Amy Mulder, Bob C. Poortvliet, P. Marijn van Vliet, Arnold J. H. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Performing a tick check after visiting nature is considered the most important preventive measure to avoid contracting Lyme disease. Checking the body for ticks after visiting nature is the only measure that can fully guarantee whether one has been bitten by a tick and provides the opportunity to remove the tick as soon as possible, thereby greatly reducing the chance of contracting Lyme disease. However, compliance to performing the tick check is low. In addition, most previous studies on determinants of preventive measures to avoid Lyme disease lack a clear definition and/or operationalization of the term “preventive measures”. Those that do distinguish multiple behaviors including the tick check, fail to describe the systematic steps that should be followed in order to perform the tick check effectively. Hence, the purpose of this study was to identify determinants of systematically performing the tick check, based on social cognitive theory. METHODS: A cross-sectional self-administered survey questionnaire was filled out online by 508 respondents (M(age) = 51.7, SD = 16.0; 50.2% men; 86.4% daily or weekly nature visitors). Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify associations between socio-cognitive determinants (i.e. concepts related to humans’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to perform certain behavior), and the tick check, and between socio-cognitive determinants and proximal goal to do the tick check. RESULTS: The full regression model explained 28% of the variance in doing the tick check. Results showed that performing the tick check was associated with proximal goal (β = .23, p < 0.01), self-efficacy (β = .22, p < 0.01), self-evaluative outcome expectations (β = .21, p < 0.01), descriptive norm (β = .16, p < 0.01), and experience (β = .13, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is among the first to examine the determinants of systematic performance of the tick check, using an extended version of social cognitive theory to identify determinants. Based on the results, a number of practical recommendations can be made to promote the performance of the tick check. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5702127/ /pubmed/29178900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Heijden, Amy Mulder, Bob C. Poortvliet, P. Marijn van Vliet, Arnold J. H. Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease |
title | Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease |
title_full | Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease |
title_fullStr | Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease |
title_short | Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease |
title_sort | social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting lyme disease |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderheijdenamy socialcognitivedeterminantsofthetickcheckacrosssectionalstudyonselfprotectivebehaviorincombattinglymedisease AT mulderbobc socialcognitivedeterminantsofthetickcheckacrosssectionalstudyonselfprotectivebehaviorincombattinglymedisease AT poortvlietpmarijn socialcognitivedeterminantsofthetickcheckacrosssectionalstudyonselfprotectivebehaviorincombattinglymedisease AT vanvlietarnoldjh socialcognitivedeterminantsofthetickcheckacrosssectionalstudyonselfprotectivebehaviorincombattinglymedisease |