Cargando…

Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease

BACKGROUND: Performing a tick check after visiting nature is considered the most important preventive measure to avoid contracting Lyme disease. Checking the body for ticks after visiting nature is the only measure that can fully guarantee whether one has been bitten by a tick and provides the oppor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Heijden, Amy, Mulder, Bob C., Poortvliet, P. Marijn, van Vliet, Arnold J. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1
_version_ 1783281460921237504
author van der Heijden, Amy
Mulder, Bob C.
Poortvliet, P. Marijn
van Vliet, Arnold J. H.
author_facet van der Heijden, Amy
Mulder, Bob C.
Poortvliet, P. Marijn
van Vliet, Arnold J. H.
author_sort van der Heijden, Amy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Performing a tick check after visiting nature is considered the most important preventive measure to avoid contracting Lyme disease. Checking the body for ticks after visiting nature is the only measure that can fully guarantee whether one has been bitten by a tick and provides the opportunity to remove the tick as soon as possible, thereby greatly reducing the chance of contracting Lyme disease. However, compliance to performing the tick check is low. In addition, most previous studies on determinants of preventive measures to avoid Lyme disease lack a clear definition and/or operationalization of the term “preventive measures”. Those that do distinguish multiple behaviors including the tick check, fail to describe the systematic steps that should be followed in order to perform the tick check effectively. Hence, the purpose of this study was to identify determinants of systematically performing the tick check, based on social cognitive theory. METHODS: A cross-sectional self-administered survey questionnaire was filled out online by 508 respondents (M(age) = 51.7, SD = 16.0; 50.2% men; 86.4% daily or weekly nature visitors). Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify associations between socio-cognitive determinants (i.e. concepts related to humans’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to perform certain behavior), and the tick check, and between socio-cognitive determinants and proximal goal to do the tick check. RESULTS: The full regression model explained 28% of the variance in doing the tick check. Results showed that performing the tick check was associated with proximal goal (β = .23, p < 0.01), self-efficacy (β = .22, p < 0.01), self-evaluative outcome expectations (β = .21, p < 0.01), descriptive norm (β = .16, p < 0.01), and experience (β = .13, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is among the first to examine the determinants of systematic performance of the tick check, using an extended version of social cognitive theory to identify determinants. Based on the results, a number of practical recommendations can be made to promote the performance of the tick check. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5702127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57021272017-12-04 Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease van der Heijden, Amy Mulder, Bob C. Poortvliet, P. Marijn van Vliet, Arnold J. H. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Performing a tick check after visiting nature is considered the most important preventive measure to avoid contracting Lyme disease. Checking the body for ticks after visiting nature is the only measure that can fully guarantee whether one has been bitten by a tick and provides the opportunity to remove the tick as soon as possible, thereby greatly reducing the chance of contracting Lyme disease. However, compliance to performing the tick check is low. In addition, most previous studies on determinants of preventive measures to avoid Lyme disease lack a clear definition and/or operationalization of the term “preventive measures”. Those that do distinguish multiple behaviors including the tick check, fail to describe the systematic steps that should be followed in order to perform the tick check effectively. Hence, the purpose of this study was to identify determinants of systematically performing the tick check, based on social cognitive theory. METHODS: A cross-sectional self-administered survey questionnaire was filled out online by 508 respondents (M(age) = 51.7, SD = 16.0; 50.2% men; 86.4% daily or weekly nature visitors). Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify associations between socio-cognitive determinants (i.e. concepts related to humans’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to perform certain behavior), and the tick check, and between socio-cognitive determinants and proximal goal to do the tick check. RESULTS: The full regression model explained 28% of the variance in doing the tick check. Results showed that performing the tick check was associated with proximal goal (β = .23, p < 0.01), self-efficacy (β = .22, p < 0.01), self-evaluative outcome expectations (β = .21, p < 0.01), descriptive norm (β = .16, p < 0.01), and experience (β = .13, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is among the first to examine the determinants of systematic performance of the tick check, using an extended version of social cognitive theory to identify determinants. Based on the results, a number of practical recommendations can be made to promote the performance of the tick check. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5702127/ /pubmed/29178900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Heijden, Amy
Mulder, Bob C.
Poortvliet, P. Marijn
van Vliet, Arnold J. H.
Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease
title Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease
title_full Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease
title_fullStr Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease
title_full_unstemmed Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease
title_short Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease
title_sort social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting lyme disease
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderheijdenamy socialcognitivedeterminantsofthetickcheckacrosssectionalstudyonselfprotectivebehaviorincombattinglymedisease
AT mulderbobc socialcognitivedeterminantsofthetickcheckacrosssectionalstudyonselfprotectivebehaviorincombattinglymedisease
AT poortvlietpmarijn socialcognitivedeterminantsofthetickcheckacrosssectionalstudyonselfprotectivebehaviorincombattinglymedisease
AT vanvlietarnoldjh socialcognitivedeterminantsofthetickcheckacrosssectionalstudyonselfprotectivebehaviorincombattinglymedisease