Cargando…

A systematic review and overview of health economic evaluations of emergency laparotomy

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the economic impact of emergency laparotomy (EL) surgery in healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the primary resource utilisation, healthcare economic and societal costs of EL in adults in different countries. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bampoe, Sohail, Odor, Peter M., Ramani Moonesinghe, S., Dickinson, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0078-z
_version_ 1783281481867591680
author Bampoe, Sohail
Odor, Peter M.
Ramani Moonesinghe, S.
Dickinson, Matthew
author_facet Bampoe, Sohail
Odor, Peter M.
Ramani Moonesinghe, S.
Dickinson, Matthew
author_sort Bampoe, Sohail
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the economic impact of emergency laparotomy (EL) surgery in healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the primary resource utilisation, healthcare economic and societal costs of EL in adults in different countries. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Central Register Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL were searched for full and partial economic analyses of EL published between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 2015. Quality of studies was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) checklist. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included from a range of countries. One study was a full economic analysis. Fifteen studies were partial economic evaluations. These studies revealed that emergency abdominal surgery is expensive compared to similar elective surgery when comparing primary resource utilisation costs, with an important societal impact. Most contemporaneous studies indicate that in-hospital costs for EL are in excess of US$10,000 per patient episode, rising substantially when societal costs are considered. DISCUSSION: EL is a high-risk and costly procedure with a disproportionate financial burden for healthcare providers, relative to national funding provisions and wider societal cost impact. There is substantial heterogeneity in the methodologies and quality of published economic evaluations of EL; therefore, the true economic costs of EL are yet to be fully defined. Future research should focus on developing strategies to embed health economic evaluations within national programmes aiming to improve EL care, including developing the required measures and infrastructure. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency laparotomy is expensive, with a significant cost burden to healthcare and systems and society worldwide. Novel strategies for reducing this econmic burden should urgently be explored if greater access to this type of surgery is to be pursued as a global health target. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. 42015027210.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5702212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57022122017-12-04 A systematic review and overview of health economic evaluations of emergency laparotomy Bampoe, Sohail Odor, Peter M. Ramani Moonesinghe, S. Dickinson, Matthew Perioper Med (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about the economic impact of emergency laparotomy (EL) surgery in healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the primary resource utilisation, healthcare economic and societal costs of EL in adults in different countries. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Central Register Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL were searched for full and partial economic analyses of EL published between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 2015. Quality of studies was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) checklist. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included from a range of countries. One study was a full economic analysis. Fifteen studies were partial economic evaluations. These studies revealed that emergency abdominal surgery is expensive compared to similar elective surgery when comparing primary resource utilisation costs, with an important societal impact. Most contemporaneous studies indicate that in-hospital costs for EL are in excess of US$10,000 per patient episode, rising substantially when societal costs are considered. DISCUSSION: EL is a high-risk and costly procedure with a disproportionate financial burden for healthcare providers, relative to national funding provisions and wider societal cost impact. There is substantial heterogeneity in the methodologies and quality of published economic evaluations of EL; therefore, the true economic costs of EL are yet to be fully defined. Future research should focus on developing strategies to embed health economic evaluations within national programmes aiming to improve EL care, including developing the required measures and infrastructure. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency laparotomy is expensive, with a significant cost burden to healthcare and systems and society worldwide. Novel strategies for reducing this econmic burden should urgently be explored if greater access to this type of surgery is to be pursued as a global health target. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. 42015027210. BioMed Central 2017-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5702212/ /pubmed/29204269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0078-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Bampoe, Sohail
Odor, Peter M.
Ramani Moonesinghe, S.
Dickinson, Matthew
A systematic review and overview of health economic evaluations of emergency laparotomy
title A systematic review and overview of health economic evaluations of emergency laparotomy
title_full A systematic review and overview of health economic evaluations of emergency laparotomy
title_fullStr A systematic review and overview of health economic evaluations of emergency laparotomy
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and overview of health economic evaluations of emergency laparotomy
title_short A systematic review and overview of health economic evaluations of emergency laparotomy
title_sort systematic review and overview of health economic evaluations of emergency laparotomy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29204269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-017-0078-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bampoesohail asystematicreviewandoverviewofhealtheconomicevaluationsofemergencylaparotomy
AT odorpeterm asystematicreviewandoverviewofhealtheconomicevaluationsofemergencylaparotomy
AT ramanimoonesinghes asystematicreviewandoverviewofhealtheconomicevaluationsofemergencylaparotomy
AT dickinsonmatthew asystematicreviewandoverviewofhealtheconomicevaluationsofemergencylaparotomy
AT bampoesohail systematicreviewandoverviewofhealtheconomicevaluationsofemergencylaparotomy
AT odorpeterm systematicreviewandoverviewofhealtheconomicevaluationsofemergencylaparotomy
AT ramanimoonesinghes systematicreviewandoverviewofhealtheconomicevaluationsofemergencylaparotomy
AT dickinsonmatthew systematicreviewandoverviewofhealtheconomicevaluationsofemergencylaparotomy