Cargando…

Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The Herbst appliance is an orthodontic appliance that is used for the correction of class II malocclusion with skeletal discrepancies. Research has shown that this is effective. However, a potential harm is excessive protrusion of the lower front teeth. This is associated with gingival r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Batista, Klaus Barretto dos Santos Lopes, Lima, Tatiana, Palomares, Nathália, Carvalho, Felipe de Assis, Quintão, Cátia, Miguel, José Augusto Mendes, Lin, Yin-Ling, Su, Ting-Li, O’Brien, Kevin
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2017
Materias:	Study Protocol
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2297-5

Ejemplares similares

Comparison between Herbst appliances with or without miniscrew anchorage
por: Manni, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliance with miniplate anchorage
por: Celikoglu, Mevlut, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extraction
por: Metzner, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects
por: Mariani, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Bimaxillary Distalization with Skeletal Anchorage for Management of Severe Skeletal Class III Open Bite Malocclusion
por: Alshehri, Abdulrahman
Publicado: (2022)

A retrospective cephalometric study on pharyngeal airway space changes after rapid palatal expansion and Herbst appliance with or without skeletal anchorage
por: Manni, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Integration of the Herbst and Begg appliance in the management of severe Class II malocclusion
por: Desai, Asavari L., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Zygomatic miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion: A controlled clinical trial
por: Bozkaya, Erdal, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effectiveness of interceptive treatment of class III malocclusions with skeletal anchorage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Rodríguez de Guzmán-Barrera, Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Maxillary protraction using customized mini-plates for anchorage in an adolescent girl with skeletal Class III malocclusion
por: Liang, Shuran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion
por: Lee, Ah-Young, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment using mandibular and maxillary skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics: a case report
por: Fakharian, Mehrnaz, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review
por: Alhammadi, Maged S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Severe skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion in postpubertal girl treated using Forsus with miniplate anchorage
por: Patil, Harshal Ashok, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak
por: Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effective and Efficient Herbst Appliance Therapy for Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Patient with a Low Degree of Collaboration with the Orthodontic Treatment
por: Souki, Bernardo Quiroga, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

No Compliance Correction of Class II Malocclusion in Growing Patients Whit HERBST Appliance: A Case Report
por: Portelli, M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients
por: Esenlik, Elçin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparative photoelastic study of dental and skeletal anchorages in the canine retraction
por: Claro, Cristiane Aparecida de Assis, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Temporary Anchorage Device: An Epitome of Anchorage in Orthodontic Treatment
por: Shetty, Preeth, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Class III Treatment with Skeletal and Dental Anchorage: A Review of Comparative Effects
por: Clemente, Roberta, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Correction of late adolescent skeletal Class III using the Alt-RAMEC protocol and skeletal anchorage
por: Büyükçavuş, Muhammed Hilmi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparing Distal-Jet with Dental Anchorage to Distal-Jet with Skeletal Anchorage: A Prospective Parallel Cohort Study
por: Altieri, Federica, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Orthodontic camouflage treatment of pseudo‐Class III malocclusion on skeletal class III Base complicated with canine impaction treated with temporary anchorage devices: A case report
por: Alotaibi, Saud
Publicado: (2023)

Management of the Vertical Dimension in the Camouflage Treatment of an Adult Skeletal Class III Malocclusion
por: Sevillano, Manuel Gustavo Chávez, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Transdisciplinary treatment of Class III malocclusion using conventional implant-supported anchorage: 10-year posttreatment follow-up
por: Rinaldi, Mariana Roennau Lemos, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Three-dimensional evaluation of tooth movement in Class II malocclusions treated without extraction by orthodontic mini-implant anchorage
por: Ali, Dler, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Orthodontic retreatment using anchorage with miniplate to camouflage a Class III skeletal pattern
por: Farret, Marcel Marchiori
Publicado: (2016)

Management of skeletal Class III with facial asymmetry using skeletal anchorage: 4-year follow-up
por: Tripathi, Tulika, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Efficacy of an innovative Herbst appliance with TADs for patients with hyperdivergent class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Wang, Yuhui, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Preliminary three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement and arch dimension change of the maxillary dentition in Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with first premolar extraction: conventional anchorage vs. mini-implant anchorage
por: Park, Heon-Mook, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Orthopedic and Nonsurgical Orthodontic Treatment of Adolescent Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction and Temporary Anchorage Devices: A Case Report
por: Alnefaie, Mohammed, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Anchorage of Gold Fillings
por: Palmer, S. B.
Publicado: (1893)

Anchorage of Gold Fillings
por: Palmer, S. B.
Publicado: (1893)

Temporary Anchorage Devices
por: Baxi, Shalabh, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Correction: Efficacy of an innovative Herbst appliance with TADs for patients with hyperdivergent class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Publicado: (2023)

Conservative treatment of a young adult patient with a moderate skeletal Class III malocclusion by applying the temporary anchorage devices and the surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion
por: Liu, Panpan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of the effects on the pharyngeal airway space of maxillary protraction appliances according to the methods of anchorage
por: Seo, Won-Gyo, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effects of a newly designed apparatus on orthodontic skeletal anchorage
por: Tozlu, Murat, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

One palatal implant for skeletal anchorage – frequency and range of indications
por: Krieger, Elena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_826uphvu9j4n6i1cvculevi24t