Cargando…
Is the information of systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date? a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: An up-to-date systematic review is important for researchers to decide whether to embark on new research or continue supporting ongoing studies. The aim of this study is to examine the time taken between the last search, submission, acceptance and publication dates of systematic reviews...
Autores principales: | Tam, Wilson W. S., Lo, Kenneth K. H., Khalechelvam, Parames, Seah, Joey, Goh, Shawn Y. S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0432-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study
por: Tam, Wilson W S, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey
por: Tam, Wilson W S, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
How psychiatric trainees keep up to date: survey of psychiatric trainees' use of journals and other information sources
por: Walker-Tilley, Tom, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Prenatal nursing intervention studies published in Korean nursing journals: a scoping review
por: Kim, Seo Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The handbook of journal publishing
por: Morris, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)