Cargando…
Do the data really support ordering fragile X testing as a first-tier test without clinical features?
PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend first-tier chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and fragile X syndrome (FX) testing for males with isolated intellectual disabilities/learning delay (ID/LD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). METHODS: Males in our clinic with ID/LD or ASD (310) were analyzed...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28541279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.64 |
_version_ | 1783281493523562496 |
---|---|
author | Weinstein, Veronique Tanpaiboon, Pranoot Chapman, Kimberly A Ah Mew, Nicholas Hofherr, Sean |
author_facet | Weinstein, Veronique Tanpaiboon, Pranoot Chapman, Kimberly A Ah Mew, Nicholas Hofherr, Sean |
author_sort | Weinstein, Veronique |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend first-tier chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and fragile X syndrome (FX) testing for males with isolated intellectual disabilities/learning delay (ID/LD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). METHODS: Males in our clinic with ID/LD or ASD (310) were analyzed for positive results from CMA and/or FX testing. RESULTS: CMA detected abnormalities in 29% of males with ID/LD and only 9% of males with ASD (including variants of uncertain significance and absence of heterozygosity). When males with ID/LD were tested for FX, the detection rate was 2.5% (2 of 80). Both patients had dysmorphic features and maternal family history. No males with ASD had positive FX test results. CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of CMA in males with isolated ID/LD in this study was higher than in the literature (10–20%). CMA results for males with ASD (9%) and FX testing for males with ID/LD (2.5%) overlap with the literature (7–10% and 2%, respectively). The yield of FX testing for patients with ASD was zero, which is close to that of the literature (0.5–2%). These results suggest that FX testing as a first-tier test may not be necessary, unless other criteria suggest FX. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5702277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57022772017-12-08 Do the data really support ordering fragile X testing as a first-tier test without clinical features? Weinstein, Veronique Tanpaiboon, Pranoot Chapman, Kimberly A Ah Mew, Nicholas Hofherr, Sean Genet Med Original Research Article PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend first-tier chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and fragile X syndrome (FX) testing for males with isolated intellectual disabilities/learning delay (ID/LD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). METHODS: Males in our clinic with ID/LD or ASD (310) were analyzed for positive results from CMA and/or FX testing. RESULTS: CMA detected abnormalities in 29% of males with ID/LD and only 9% of males with ASD (including variants of uncertain significance and absence of heterozygosity). When males with ID/LD were tested for FX, the detection rate was 2.5% (2 of 80). Both patients had dysmorphic features and maternal family history. No males with ASD had positive FX test results. CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of CMA in males with isolated ID/LD in this study was higher than in the literature (10–20%). CMA results for males with ASD (9%) and FX testing for males with ID/LD (2.5%) overlap with the literature (7–10% and 2%, respectively). The yield of FX testing for patients with ASD was zero, which is close to that of the literature (0.5–2%). These results suggest that FX testing as a first-tier test may not be necessary, unless other criteria suggest FX. Nature Publishing Group 2017-12 2017-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5702277/ /pubmed/28541279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.64 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Weinstein, Veronique Tanpaiboon, Pranoot Chapman, Kimberly A Ah Mew, Nicholas Hofherr, Sean Do the data really support ordering fragile X testing as a first-tier test without clinical features? |
title | Do the data really support ordering fragile X testing as a first-tier test without clinical features? |
title_full | Do the data really support ordering fragile X testing as a first-tier test without clinical features? |
title_fullStr | Do the data really support ordering fragile X testing as a first-tier test without clinical features? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do the data really support ordering fragile X testing as a first-tier test without clinical features? |
title_short | Do the data really support ordering fragile X testing as a first-tier test without clinical features? |
title_sort | do the data really support ordering fragile x testing as a first-tier test without clinical features? |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28541279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.64 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weinsteinveronique dothedatareallysupportorderingfragilextestingasafirsttiertestwithoutclinicalfeatures AT tanpaiboonpranoot dothedatareallysupportorderingfragilextestingasafirsttiertestwithoutclinicalfeatures AT chapmankimberlya dothedatareallysupportorderingfragilextestingasafirsttiertestwithoutclinicalfeatures AT ahmewnicholas dothedatareallysupportorderingfragilextestingasafirsttiertestwithoutclinicalfeatures AT hofherrsean dothedatareallysupportorderingfragilextestingasafirsttiertestwithoutclinicalfeatures |