Cargando…
Smart Aging Platform for Evaluating Cognitive Functions in Aging: A Comparison with the MoCA in a Normal Population
Background: Smart Aging is a Serious games (SGs) platform in a 3D virtual environment in which users perform a set of screening tests that address various cognitive skills. The tests are structured as 5 tasks of activities of daily life in a familiar environment. The main goal of the present study i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29209200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00379 |
_version_ | 1783281502073651200 |
---|---|
author | Bottiroli, Sara Tassorelli, Cristina Lamonica, Marialisa Zucchella, Chiara Cavallini, Elena Bernini, Sara Sinforiani, Elena Pazzi, Stefania Cristiani, Paolo Vecchi, Tomaso Tost, Daniela Sandrini, Giorgio |
author_facet | Bottiroli, Sara Tassorelli, Cristina Lamonica, Marialisa Zucchella, Chiara Cavallini, Elena Bernini, Sara Sinforiani, Elena Pazzi, Stefania Cristiani, Paolo Vecchi, Tomaso Tost, Daniela Sandrini, Giorgio |
author_sort | Bottiroli, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Smart Aging is a Serious games (SGs) platform in a 3D virtual environment in which users perform a set of screening tests that address various cognitive skills. The tests are structured as 5 tasks of activities of daily life in a familiar environment. The main goal of the present study is to compare a cognitive evaluation made with Smart Aging with those of a classic standardized screening test, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Methods: One thousand one-hundred thirty-one healthy adults aged between 50 and 80 (M = 64.3 ± 8.3) were enrolled in the study. They received a cognitive evaluation with the MoCA and the Smart Aging platform. Participants were grouped according to their MoCA global and specific cognitive domain (i.e., memory, executive functions, working memory, visual spatial elaboration, language, and orientation) scores and we explored differences among these groups in the Smart Aging indices. Results: One thousand eighty-six older adults (M = 64.0 ± 8.0) successfully completed the study and were stratified according to their MoCA score: Group 1 with MoCA < 27 (n = 360); Group 2 with 27 ≥ MoCA < 29 (n = 453); and Group 3 with MoCA ≥ 29 (n = 273). MoCA groups significantly differed in most of the Smart Aging indices considered, in particular as concerns accuracy (ps < 0.001) and time (ps < 0.001) for completing most of the platform tasks. Group 1 was outperformed by the other two Groups and was slower than them in these tasks, which were those supposed to assess memory and executive functions. In addition, significant differences across groups also emerged when considering the single cognitive domains of the MoCA and the corresponding performances in each Smart Aging task. In particular, this platform seems to be a good proxy for assessing memory, executive functions, working memory, and visual spatial processes. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the validity of Smart Aging for assessing cognitive functions in normal aging. Future studies will validate this platform also in the clinical aging populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5702318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57023182017-12-05 Smart Aging Platform for Evaluating Cognitive Functions in Aging: A Comparison with the MoCA in a Normal Population Bottiroli, Sara Tassorelli, Cristina Lamonica, Marialisa Zucchella, Chiara Cavallini, Elena Bernini, Sara Sinforiani, Elena Pazzi, Stefania Cristiani, Paolo Vecchi, Tomaso Tost, Daniela Sandrini, Giorgio Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Smart Aging is a Serious games (SGs) platform in a 3D virtual environment in which users perform a set of screening tests that address various cognitive skills. The tests are structured as 5 tasks of activities of daily life in a familiar environment. The main goal of the present study is to compare a cognitive evaluation made with Smart Aging with those of a classic standardized screening test, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Methods: One thousand one-hundred thirty-one healthy adults aged between 50 and 80 (M = 64.3 ± 8.3) were enrolled in the study. They received a cognitive evaluation with the MoCA and the Smart Aging platform. Participants were grouped according to their MoCA global and specific cognitive domain (i.e., memory, executive functions, working memory, visual spatial elaboration, language, and orientation) scores and we explored differences among these groups in the Smart Aging indices. Results: One thousand eighty-six older adults (M = 64.0 ± 8.0) successfully completed the study and were stratified according to their MoCA score: Group 1 with MoCA < 27 (n = 360); Group 2 with 27 ≥ MoCA < 29 (n = 453); and Group 3 with MoCA ≥ 29 (n = 273). MoCA groups significantly differed in most of the Smart Aging indices considered, in particular as concerns accuracy (ps < 0.001) and time (ps < 0.001) for completing most of the platform tasks. Group 1 was outperformed by the other two Groups and was slower than them in these tasks, which were those supposed to assess memory and executive functions. In addition, significant differences across groups also emerged when considering the single cognitive domains of the MoCA and the corresponding performances in each Smart Aging task. In particular, this platform seems to be a good proxy for assessing memory, executive functions, working memory, and visual spatial processes. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the validity of Smart Aging for assessing cognitive functions in normal aging. Future studies will validate this platform also in the clinical aging populations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5702318/ /pubmed/29209200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00379 Text en Copyright © 2017 Bottiroli, Tassorelli, Lamonica, Zucchella, Cavallini, Bernini, Sinforiani, Pazzi, Cristiani, Vecchi, Tost and Sandrini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Bottiroli, Sara Tassorelli, Cristina Lamonica, Marialisa Zucchella, Chiara Cavallini, Elena Bernini, Sara Sinforiani, Elena Pazzi, Stefania Cristiani, Paolo Vecchi, Tomaso Tost, Daniela Sandrini, Giorgio Smart Aging Platform for Evaluating Cognitive Functions in Aging: A Comparison with the MoCA in a Normal Population |
title | Smart Aging Platform for Evaluating Cognitive Functions in Aging: A Comparison with the MoCA in a Normal Population |
title_full | Smart Aging Platform for Evaluating Cognitive Functions in Aging: A Comparison with the MoCA in a Normal Population |
title_fullStr | Smart Aging Platform for Evaluating Cognitive Functions in Aging: A Comparison with the MoCA in a Normal Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Smart Aging Platform for Evaluating Cognitive Functions in Aging: A Comparison with the MoCA in a Normal Population |
title_short | Smart Aging Platform for Evaluating Cognitive Functions in Aging: A Comparison with the MoCA in a Normal Population |
title_sort | smart aging platform for evaluating cognitive functions in aging: a comparison with the moca in a normal population |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29209200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bottirolisara smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT tassorellicristina smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT lamonicamarialisa smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT zucchellachiara smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT cavallinielena smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT berninisara smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT sinforianielena smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT pazzistefania smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT cristianipaolo smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT vecchitomaso smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT tostdaniela smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation AT sandrinigiorgio smartagingplatformforevaluatingcognitivefunctionsinagingacomparisonwiththemocainanormalpopulation |