Cargando…

Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

AIMS: Previous epidemiological investigations of the relationship between smoking and acute mountain sickness (AMS) risk yielded inconsistent findings. Therefore, a meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to determine whether smoking is related to the development of AMS. METHODS: Search...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina, Sánchez-Mascuñano, Alba, Santangelo, Fernando Agüero, Ramos, Sergio Morchón, Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1409656
_version_ 1783281523348209664
author Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina
Sánchez-Mascuñano, Alba
Santangelo, Fernando Agüero
Ramos, Sergio Morchón
Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria
author_facet Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina
Sánchez-Mascuñano, Alba
Santangelo, Fernando Agüero
Ramos, Sergio Morchón
Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria
author_sort Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Previous epidemiological investigations of the relationship between smoking and acute mountain sickness (AMS) risk yielded inconsistent findings. Therefore, a meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to determine whether smoking is related to the development of AMS. METHODS: Searches were performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant studies that were published before November 2016 reporting smoking prevalence and AMS. Two evaluators independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. The pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of participant, altitude, and study design. RESULTS: A total of 11 observational studies involving 7,106 participants, 2,408 of which had AMS, were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The summary RR for AMS comparing smokers to nonsmokers was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.26). Specific analyses for altitude, type of participant, and study design yielded similar results. There was significant heterogeneity for all studies (Q = 37.43; P < 0.001; I(2) = 73%, 95% CI: 51% to 85%). No publication bias was observed (Egger's test: P = 0.548, Begg's test: P = 0.418). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates that no difference was found in AMS risk with regard to smoking status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5702408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57024082017-12-19 Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina Sánchez-Mascuñano, Alba Santangelo, Fernando Agüero Ramos, Sergio Morchón Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria Biomed Res Int Review Article AIMS: Previous epidemiological investigations of the relationship between smoking and acute mountain sickness (AMS) risk yielded inconsistent findings. Therefore, a meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to determine whether smoking is related to the development of AMS. METHODS: Searches were performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant studies that were published before November 2016 reporting smoking prevalence and AMS. Two evaluators independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. The pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of participant, altitude, and study design. RESULTS: A total of 11 observational studies involving 7,106 participants, 2,408 of which had AMS, were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The summary RR for AMS comparing smokers to nonsmokers was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.26). Specific analyses for altitude, type of participant, and study design yielded similar results. There was significant heterogeneity for all studies (Q = 37.43; P < 0.001; I(2) = 73%, 95% CI: 51% to 85%). No publication bias was observed (Egger's test: P = 0.548, Begg's test: P = 0.418). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates that no difference was found in AMS risk with regard to smoking status. Hindawi 2017 2017-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5702408/ /pubmed/29259975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1409656 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cristina Masuet-Aumatell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina
Sánchez-Mascuñano, Alba
Santangelo, Fernando Agüero
Ramos, Sergio Morchón
Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria
Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_full Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_fullStr Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_short Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_sort relationship between smoking and acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis of observational studies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1409656
work_keys_str_mv AT masuetaumatellcristina relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT sanchezmascunanoalba relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT santangelofernandoaguero relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT ramossergiomorchon relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT ramontorrelljosepmaria relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies