Cargando…
Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
AIMS: Previous epidemiological investigations of the relationship between smoking and acute mountain sickness (AMS) risk yielded inconsistent findings. Therefore, a meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to determine whether smoking is related to the development of AMS. METHODS: Search...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1409656 |
_version_ | 1783281523348209664 |
---|---|
author | Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina Sánchez-Mascuñano, Alba Santangelo, Fernando Agüero Ramos, Sergio Morchón Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria |
author_facet | Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina Sánchez-Mascuñano, Alba Santangelo, Fernando Agüero Ramos, Sergio Morchón Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria |
author_sort | Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Previous epidemiological investigations of the relationship between smoking and acute mountain sickness (AMS) risk yielded inconsistent findings. Therefore, a meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to determine whether smoking is related to the development of AMS. METHODS: Searches were performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant studies that were published before November 2016 reporting smoking prevalence and AMS. Two evaluators independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. The pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of participant, altitude, and study design. RESULTS: A total of 11 observational studies involving 7,106 participants, 2,408 of which had AMS, were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The summary RR for AMS comparing smokers to nonsmokers was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.26). Specific analyses for altitude, type of participant, and study design yielded similar results. There was significant heterogeneity for all studies (Q = 37.43; P < 0.001; I(2) = 73%, 95% CI: 51% to 85%). No publication bias was observed (Egger's test: P = 0.548, Begg's test: P = 0.418). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates that no difference was found in AMS risk with regard to smoking status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5702408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57024082017-12-19 Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina Sánchez-Mascuñano, Alba Santangelo, Fernando Agüero Ramos, Sergio Morchón Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria Biomed Res Int Review Article AIMS: Previous epidemiological investigations of the relationship between smoking and acute mountain sickness (AMS) risk yielded inconsistent findings. Therefore, a meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to determine whether smoking is related to the development of AMS. METHODS: Searches were performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant studies that were published before November 2016 reporting smoking prevalence and AMS. Two evaluators independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. The pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of participant, altitude, and study design. RESULTS: A total of 11 observational studies involving 7,106 participants, 2,408 of which had AMS, were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The summary RR for AMS comparing smokers to nonsmokers was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.26). Specific analyses for altitude, type of participant, and study design yielded similar results. There was significant heterogeneity for all studies (Q = 37.43; P < 0.001; I(2) = 73%, 95% CI: 51% to 85%). No publication bias was observed (Egger's test: P = 0.548, Begg's test: P = 0.418). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates that no difference was found in AMS risk with regard to smoking status. Hindawi 2017 2017-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5702408/ /pubmed/29259975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1409656 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cristina Masuet-Aumatell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Masuet-Aumatell, Cristina Sánchez-Mascuñano, Alba Santangelo, Fernando Agüero Ramos, Sergio Morchón Ramon-Torrell, Josep Maria Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title | Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_full | Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_fullStr | Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_short | Relationship between Smoking and Acute Mountain Sickness: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_sort | relationship between smoking and acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis of observational studies |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29259975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1409656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masuetaumatellcristina relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT sanchezmascunanoalba relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT santangelofernandoaguero relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT ramossergiomorchon relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT ramontorrelljosepmaria relationshipbetweensmokingandacutemountainsicknessametaanalysisofobservationalstudies |