Cargando…

Insight into partial agonism by observing multiple equilibria for ligand-bound and G(s)-mimetic nanobody-bound β(1)-adrenergic receptor

A complex conformational energy landscape determines G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling via intracellular binding partners (IBPs), e.g., G(s) and β-arrestin. Using (13)C methyl methionine NMR for the β(1)-adrenergic receptor, we identify ligand efficacy-dependent equilibria between an inac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solt, Andras S., Bostock, Mark J., Shrestha, Binesh, Kumar, Prashant, Warne, Tony, Tate, Christopher G., Nietlispach, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29176642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02008-y
Descripción
Sumario:A complex conformational energy landscape determines G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling via intracellular binding partners (IBPs), e.g., G(s) and β-arrestin. Using (13)C methyl methionine NMR for the β(1)-adrenergic receptor, we identify ligand efficacy-dependent equilibria between an inactive and pre-active state and, in complex with G(s)-mimetic nanobody, between more and less active ternary complexes. Formation of a basal activity complex through ligand-free nanobody–receptor interaction reveals structural differences on the cytoplasmic receptor side compared to the full agonist-bound nanobody-coupled form, suggesting that ligand-induced variations in G-protein interaction underpin partial agonism. Significant differences in receptor dynamics are observed ranging from rigid nanobody-coupled states to extensive μs-to-ms timescale dynamics when bound to a full agonist. We suggest that the mobility of the full agonist-bound form primes the GPCR to couple to IBPs. On formation of the ternary complex, ligand efficacy determines the quality of the interaction between the rigidified receptor and an IBP and consequently the signalling level.