Cargando…

Multisensory and Modality-Specific Influences on Adaptation to Optical Prisms

Visuo-motor adaptation to optical prisms displacing the visual scene (prism adaptation, PA) is a method used for investigating visuo-motor plasticity in healthy individuals and, in clinical settings, for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect. In the standard paradigm, the adaptation phase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calzolari, Elena, Albini, Federica, Bolognini, Nadia, Vallar, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213233
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00568
_version_ 1783281585240408064
author Calzolari, Elena
Albini, Federica
Bolognini, Nadia
Vallar, Giuseppe
author_facet Calzolari, Elena
Albini, Federica
Bolognini, Nadia
Vallar, Giuseppe
author_sort Calzolari, Elena
collection PubMed
description Visuo-motor adaptation to optical prisms displacing the visual scene (prism adaptation, PA) is a method used for investigating visuo-motor plasticity in healthy individuals and, in clinical settings, for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect. In the standard paradigm, the adaptation phase involves repeated pointings to visual targets, while wearing optical prisms displacing the visual scene laterally. Here we explored differences in PA, and its aftereffects (AEs), as related to the sensory modality of the target. Visual, auditory, and multisensory – audio-visual – targets in the adaptation phase were used, while participants wore prisms displacing the visual field rightward by 10°. Proprioceptive, visual, visual-proprioceptive, auditory-proprioceptive straight-ahead shifts were measured. Pointing to auditory and to audio-visual targets in the adaptation phase produces proprioceptive, visual-proprioceptive, and auditory-proprioceptive AEs, as the typical visual targets did. This finding reveals that cross-modal plasticity effects involve both the auditory and the visual modality, and their interactions (Experiment 1). Even a shortened PA phase, requiring only 24 pointings to visual and audio-visual targets (Experiment 2), is sufficient to bring about AEs, as compared to the standard 92-pointings procedure. Finally, pointings to auditory targets cause AEs, although PA with a reduced number of pointings (24) to auditory targets brings about smaller AEs, as compared to the 92-pointings procedure (Experiment 3). Together, results from the three experiments extend to the auditory modality the sensorimotor plasticity underlying the typical AEs produced by PA to visual targets. Importantly, PA to auditory targets appears characterized by less accurate pointings and error correction, suggesting that the auditory component of the PA process may be less central to the building up of the AEs, than the sensorimotor pointing activity per se. These findings highlight both the effectiveness of a reduced number of pointings for bringing about AEs, and the possibility of inducing PA with auditory targets, which may be used as a compensatory route in patients with visual deficits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5702769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57027692017-12-06 Multisensory and Modality-Specific Influences on Adaptation to Optical Prisms Calzolari, Elena Albini, Federica Bolognini, Nadia Vallar, Giuseppe Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Visuo-motor adaptation to optical prisms displacing the visual scene (prism adaptation, PA) is a method used for investigating visuo-motor plasticity in healthy individuals and, in clinical settings, for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect. In the standard paradigm, the adaptation phase involves repeated pointings to visual targets, while wearing optical prisms displacing the visual scene laterally. Here we explored differences in PA, and its aftereffects (AEs), as related to the sensory modality of the target. Visual, auditory, and multisensory – audio-visual – targets in the adaptation phase were used, while participants wore prisms displacing the visual field rightward by 10°. Proprioceptive, visual, visual-proprioceptive, auditory-proprioceptive straight-ahead shifts were measured. Pointing to auditory and to audio-visual targets in the adaptation phase produces proprioceptive, visual-proprioceptive, and auditory-proprioceptive AEs, as the typical visual targets did. This finding reveals that cross-modal plasticity effects involve both the auditory and the visual modality, and their interactions (Experiment 1). Even a shortened PA phase, requiring only 24 pointings to visual and audio-visual targets (Experiment 2), is sufficient to bring about AEs, as compared to the standard 92-pointings procedure. Finally, pointings to auditory targets cause AEs, although PA with a reduced number of pointings (24) to auditory targets brings about smaller AEs, as compared to the 92-pointings procedure (Experiment 3). Together, results from the three experiments extend to the auditory modality the sensorimotor plasticity underlying the typical AEs produced by PA to visual targets. Importantly, PA to auditory targets appears characterized by less accurate pointings and error correction, suggesting that the auditory component of the PA process may be less central to the building up of the AEs, than the sensorimotor pointing activity per se. These findings highlight both the effectiveness of a reduced number of pointings for bringing about AEs, and the possibility of inducing PA with auditory targets, which may be used as a compensatory route in patients with visual deficits. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5702769/ /pubmed/29213233 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00568 Text en Copyright © 2017 Calzolari, Albini, Bolognini and Vallar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Calzolari, Elena
Albini, Federica
Bolognini, Nadia
Vallar, Giuseppe
Multisensory and Modality-Specific Influences on Adaptation to Optical Prisms
title Multisensory and Modality-Specific Influences on Adaptation to Optical Prisms
title_full Multisensory and Modality-Specific Influences on Adaptation to Optical Prisms
title_fullStr Multisensory and Modality-Specific Influences on Adaptation to Optical Prisms
title_full_unstemmed Multisensory and Modality-Specific Influences on Adaptation to Optical Prisms
title_short Multisensory and Modality-Specific Influences on Adaptation to Optical Prisms
title_sort multisensory and modality-specific influences on adaptation to optical prisms
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29213233
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00568
work_keys_str_mv AT calzolarielena multisensoryandmodalityspecificinfluencesonadaptationtoopticalprisms
AT albinifederica multisensoryandmodalityspecificinfluencesonadaptationtoopticalprisms
AT bolognininadia multisensoryandmodalityspecificinfluencesonadaptationtoopticalprisms
AT vallargiuseppe multisensoryandmodalityspecificinfluencesonadaptationtoopticalprisms