Cargando…

Evaluation of factors influencing the success rate of orthodontic microimplants using panoramic radiographs

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate factors influencing the success rate of orthodontic microimplants (OMIs) using panoramic radiographs (PRs). METHODS: We examined 160 OMIs inserted bilaterally in the maxillary buccal alveolar bone between the second premolars and first molars o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jae Hyun, Chae, Jong-Moon, Bay, R. Curtis, Kim, Mi-Jung, Lee, Keun-Young, Chang, Na-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Orthodontists 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29291186
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.1.30
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate factors influencing the success rate of orthodontic microimplants (OMIs) using panoramic radiographs (PRs). METHODS: We examined 160 OMIs inserted bilaterally in the maxillary buccal alveolar bone between the second premolars and first molars of 80 patients (51 women, 29 men; mean age, 18.0 ± 6.1 years) undergoing treatment for malocclusion. The angulation and position of OMIs, as well as other parameters, were measured on PRs. The correlation between each measurement and the OMI success rate was then evaluated. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 85.0% (136/160). Age was found to be a significant predictor of implant success (p < 0.05), while sex, side of placement, extraction, and position of the OMI tip were not significant predictors (p > 0.05). The highest success rate was observed for OMIs with tips positioned on the interradicular midline (IRML; central position). Univariate analyses revealed that the OMI success rate significantly increased with an increase in the OMI length and placement height of OMI (p = 0.001). However, in simultaneous analyses, only length remained significant (p = 0.027). Root proximity, distance between the OMI tip and IRML, interradicular distance, alveolar crest width, distance between the OMI head and IRML, and placement angle were not factors for success. Correlations between the placement angle and all other measurements except root proximity were statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that OMIs positioned more apically with a lesser angulation, as observed on PRs, exhibit high success rates.