Cargando…
qPCR primer design revisited
Primers are arguably the single most critical components of any PCR assay, as their properties control the exquisite specificity and sensitivity that make this method uniquely powerful. Consequently, poor design combined with failure to optimise reaction conditions is likely to result in reduced tec...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2017.11.001 |
_version_ | 1783281601638039552 |
---|---|
author | Bustin, Stephen Huggett, Jim |
author_facet | Bustin, Stephen Huggett, Jim |
author_sort | Bustin, Stephen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Primers are arguably the single most critical components of any PCR assay, as their properties control the exquisite specificity and sensitivity that make this method uniquely powerful. Consequently, poor design combined with failure to optimise reaction conditions is likely to result in reduced technical precision and false positive or negative detection of amplification targets. Despite the framework provided by the MIQE guidelines and the accessibility of wide-ranging support from peer-reviewed publications, books and online sources as well as commercial companies, the design of many published assays continues to be less than optimal: primers often lack intended specificity, can form dimers, compete with template secondary structures at the primer binding sites or hybridise only within a narrow temperature range. We present an overview of the main steps in the primer design workflow, with data that illustrate some of the unexpected variability that often occurs when theory is translated into practice. We also strongly urge researchers to report as much information about their assays as possible in their publications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5702850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57028502017-12-01 qPCR primer design revisited Bustin, Stephen Huggett, Jim Biomol Detect Quantif Review Primers are arguably the single most critical components of any PCR assay, as their properties control the exquisite specificity and sensitivity that make this method uniquely powerful. Consequently, poor design combined with failure to optimise reaction conditions is likely to result in reduced technical precision and false positive or negative detection of amplification targets. Despite the framework provided by the MIQE guidelines and the accessibility of wide-ranging support from peer-reviewed publications, books and online sources as well as commercial companies, the design of many published assays continues to be less than optimal: primers often lack intended specificity, can form dimers, compete with template secondary structures at the primer binding sites or hybridise only within a narrow temperature range. We present an overview of the main steps in the primer design workflow, with data that illustrate some of the unexpected variability that often occurs when theory is translated into practice. We also strongly urge researchers to report as much information about their assays as possible in their publications. Elsevier 2017-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5702850/ /pubmed/29201647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2017.11.001 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Bustin, Stephen Huggett, Jim qPCR primer design revisited |
title | qPCR primer design revisited |
title_full | qPCR primer design revisited |
title_fullStr | qPCR primer design revisited |
title_full_unstemmed | qPCR primer design revisited |
title_short | qPCR primer design revisited |
title_sort | qpcr primer design revisited |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2017.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bustinstephen qpcrprimerdesignrevisited AT huggettjim qpcrprimerdesignrevisited |