Cargando…
Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository
BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating new cancer treatments. They are, however, expensive to conduct, particularly where long-term follow-up of participants is required. Tracking participants via routine datasets could provide a cost-effective alternative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29179731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2308-6 |
_version_ | 1783281620707442688 |
---|---|
author | Kilburn, Lucy Suzanne Aresu, Maria Banerji, Jane Barrett-Lee, Peter Ellis, Paul Bliss, Judith Margaret |
author_facet | Kilburn, Lucy Suzanne Aresu, Maria Banerji, Jane Barrett-Lee, Peter Ellis, Paul Bliss, Judith Margaret |
author_sort | Kilburn, Lucy Suzanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating new cancer treatments. They are, however, expensive to conduct, particularly where long-term follow-up of participants is required. Tracking participants via routine datasets could provide a cost-effective alternative for ascertaining follow-up information required to evaluate disease outcomes. This project explores the potential for routine data to inform cancer trials, using, the historical National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR) for English NHS sites and, for validation, mature data available from the TACT trial. METHODS: Datasets were matched using patients’ NHS number, date of birth (dob) and name/initials. Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes were assessed for agreement and completeness. Overall survival was compared between NCDR and TACT. RESULTS: A total of 3151 patients underwent linkage; 3047 (96.7%) of which had matched records. Extensive cleaning was required for some registry data fields, e.g. cause of death, whilst others had large amounts of missing data, e.g. tumour size (22.1%). Other data had high levels of matching such as dob (99.6%) and date of death (89.6%). There was no evidence of differential survival rates (8-year survival: TACT = 75% (95% CI 73, 76); NCDR = 76% (95% CI 74, 77)). CONCLUSIONS: Data quality and completeness requires improvement before routine data could be used for RCTs. Introduction of new routine datasets, including COSD, is welcomed although reporting of disease-recurrence events remains a concern. Prospective validation of such datasets is required before RCTs can confidently switch patient follow-up to utilise routinely collected NHS-based data. TACT TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00033683, registered on 9 April 2002; ISRCTN79718493, registered on 1 July 2001. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5702960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57029602017-12-05 Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository Kilburn, Lucy Suzanne Aresu, Maria Banerji, Jane Barrett-Lee, Peter Ellis, Paul Bliss, Judith Margaret Trials Research BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating new cancer treatments. They are, however, expensive to conduct, particularly where long-term follow-up of participants is required. Tracking participants via routine datasets could provide a cost-effective alternative for ascertaining follow-up information required to evaluate disease outcomes. This project explores the potential for routine data to inform cancer trials, using, the historical National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR) for English NHS sites and, for validation, mature data available from the TACT trial. METHODS: Datasets were matched using patients’ NHS number, date of birth (dob) and name/initials. Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes were assessed for agreement and completeness. Overall survival was compared between NCDR and TACT. RESULTS: A total of 3151 patients underwent linkage; 3047 (96.7%) of which had matched records. Extensive cleaning was required for some registry data fields, e.g. cause of death, whilst others had large amounts of missing data, e.g. tumour size (22.1%). Other data had high levels of matching such as dob (99.6%) and date of death (89.6%). There was no evidence of differential survival rates (8-year survival: TACT = 75% (95% CI 73, 76); NCDR = 76% (95% CI 74, 77)). CONCLUSIONS: Data quality and completeness requires improvement before routine data could be used for RCTs. Introduction of new routine datasets, including COSD, is welcomed although reporting of disease-recurrence events remains a concern. Prospective validation of such datasets is required before RCTs can confidently switch patient follow-up to utilise routinely collected NHS-based data. TACT TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00033683, registered on 9 April 2002; ISRCTN79718493, registered on 1 July 2001. BioMed Central 2017-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5702960/ /pubmed/29179731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2308-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kilburn, Lucy Suzanne Aresu, Maria Banerji, Jane Barrett-Lee, Peter Ellis, Paul Bliss, Judith Margaret Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository |
title | Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository |
title_full | Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository |
title_fullStr | Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository |
title_full_unstemmed | Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository |
title_short | Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository |
title_sort | can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? a historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the tact (cruk 01/001) breast cancer trial and the national cancer data repository |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29179731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2308-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kilburnlucysuzanne canroutinedatabeusedtosupportcancerclinicaltrialsahistoricalbaselineonwhichtobuildretrospectivelinkageofdatafromthetactcruk01001breastcancertrialandthenationalcancerdatarepository AT aresumaria canroutinedatabeusedtosupportcancerclinicaltrialsahistoricalbaselineonwhichtobuildretrospectivelinkageofdatafromthetactcruk01001breastcancertrialandthenationalcancerdatarepository AT banerjijane canroutinedatabeusedtosupportcancerclinicaltrialsahistoricalbaselineonwhichtobuildretrospectivelinkageofdatafromthetactcruk01001breastcancertrialandthenationalcancerdatarepository AT barrettleepeter canroutinedatabeusedtosupportcancerclinicaltrialsahistoricalbaselineonwhichtobuildretrospectivelinkageofdatafromthetactcruk01001breastcancertrialandthenationalcancerdatarepository AT ellispaul canroutinedatabeusedtosupportcancerclinicaltrialsahistoricalbaselineonwhichtobuildretrospectivelinkageofdatafromthetactcruk01001breastcancertrialandthenationalcancerdatarepository AT blissjudithmargaret canroutinedatabeusedtosupportcancerclinicaltrialsahistoricalbaselineonwhichtobuildretrospectivelinkageofdatafromthetactcruk01001breastcancertrialandthenationalcancerdatarepository |