Cargando…

Validating epilepsy diagnoses in routinely collected data

PURPOSE: Anonymised, routinely-collected healthcare data is increasingly being used for epilepsy research. We validated algorithms using general practitioner (GP) primary healthcare records to identify people with epilepsy from anonymised healthcare data within the Secure Anonymised Information Link...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fonferko-Shadrach, Beata, Lacey, Arron S., White, Catharine P., Powell, H.W. Rob, Sawhney, Inder M.S., Lyons, Ronan A., Smith, Phil E.M., Kerr, Mike P., Rees, Mark I., Pickrell, W. Owen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5703030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2017.10.008
_version_ 1783281632207175680
author Fonferko-Shadrach, Beata
Lacey, Arron S.
White, Catharine P.
Powell, H.W. Rob
Sawhney, Inder M.S.
Lyons, Ronan A.
Smith, Phil E.M.
Kerr, Mike P.
Rees, Mark I.
Pickrell, W. Owen
author_facet Fonferko-Shadrach, Beata
Lacey, Arron S.
White, Catharine P.
Powell, H.W. Rob
Sawhney, Inder M.S.
Lyons, Ronan A.
Smith, Phil E.M.
Kerr, Mike P.
Rees, Mark I.
Pickrell, W. Owen
author_sort Fonferko-Shadrach, Beata
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Anonymised, routinely-collected healthcare data is increasingly being used for epilepsy research. We validated algorithms using general practitioner (GP) primary healthcare records to identify people with epilepsy from anonymised healthcare data within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank in Wales, UK. METHOD: A reference population of 150 people with definite epilepsy and 150 people without epilepsy was ascertained from hospital records and linked to records contained within SAIL (containing GP records for 2.4 million people). We used three different algorithms, using combinations of GP epilepsy diagnosis and anti-epileptic drug (AED) prescription codes, to identify the reference population. RESULTS: Combining diagnosis and AED prescription codes had a sensitivity of 84% (95% ci 77–90) and specificity of 98% (95–100) in identifying people with epilepsy; diagnosis codes alone had a sensitivity of 86% (80–91) and a specificity of 97% (92–99); and AED prescription codes alone achieved a sensitivity of 92% (70–83) and a specificity of 73% (65–80). Using AED codes only was more accurate in children achieving a sensitivity of 88% (75–95) and specificity of 98% (88–100). CONCLUSION: GP epilepsy diagnosis and AED prescription codes can be confidently used to identify people with epilepsy using anonymised healthcare records in Wales, UK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5703030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57030302017-12-01 Validating epilepsy diagnoses in routinely collected data Fonferko-Shadrach, Beata Lacey, Arron S. White, Catharine P. Powell, H.W. Rob Sawhney, Inder M.S. Lyons, Ronan A. Smith, Phil E.M. Kerr, Mike P. Rees, Mark I. Pickrell, W. Owen Seizure Article PURPOSE: Anonymised, routinely-collected healthcare data is increasingly being used for epilepsy research. We validated algorithms using general practitioner (GP) primary healthcare records to identify people with epilepsy from anonymised healthcare data within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank in Wales, UK. METHOD: A reference population of 150 people with definite epilepsy and 150 people without epilepsy was ascertained from hospital records and linked to records contained within SAIL (containing GP records for 2.4 million people). We used three different algorithms, using combinations of GP epilepsy diagnosis and anti-epileptic drug (AED) prescription codes, to identify the reference population. RESULTS: Combining diagnosis and AED prescription codes had a sensitivity of 84% (95% ci 77–90) and specificity of 98% (95–100) in identifying people with epilepsy; diagnosis codes alone had a sensitivity of 86% (80–91) and a specificity of 97% (92–99); and AED prescription codes alone achieved a sensitivity of 92% (70–83) and a specificity of 73% (65–80). Using AED codes only was more accurate in children achieving a sensitivity of 88% (75–95) and specificity of 98% (88–100). CONCLUSION: GP epilepsy diagnosis and AED prescription codes can be confidently used to identify people with epilepsy using anonymised healthcare records in Wales, UK. Elsevier 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5703030/ /pubmed/29059611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2017.10.008 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fonferko-Shadrach, Beata
Lacey, Arron S.
White, Catharine P.
Powell, H.W. Rob
Sawhney, Inder M.S.
Lyons, Ronan A.
Smith, Phil E.M.
Kerr, Mike P.
Rees, Mark I.
Pickrell, W. Owen
Validating epilepsy diagnoses in routinely collected data
title Validating epilepsy diagnoses in routinely collected data
title_full Validating epilepsy diagnoses in routinely collected data
title_fullStr Validating epilepsy diagnoses in routinely collected data
title_full_unstemmed Validating epilepsy diagnoses in routinely collected data
title_short Validating epilepsy diagnoses in routinely collected data
title_sort validating epilepsy diagnoses in routinely collected data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5703030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2017.10.008
work_keys_str_mv AT fonferkoshadrachbeata validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata
AT laceyarrons validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata
AT whitecatharinep validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata
AT powellhwrob validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata
AT sawhneyinderms validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata
AT lyonsronana validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata
AT smithphilem validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata
AT kerrmikep validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata
AT reesmarki validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata
AT pickrellwowen validatingepilepsydiagnosesinroutinelycollecteddata