Cargando…

Physiological and training characteristics of recreational marathon runners

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the physical and training characteristics of recreational marathon runners within finish time bandings (2.5–3 h, 3–3.5 h, 3.5–4 h, 4–4.5 h and >4.5 h). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 97 recreational marathon runners (age 42.4 ± 9.9 years; mass 69.2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gordon, Dan, Wightman, Sarah, Basevitch, Itay, Johnstone, James, Espejo-Sanchez, Carolina, Beckford, Chelsea, Boal, Mariette, Scruton, Adrian, Ferrandino, Mike, Merzbach, Viviane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5703178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29200895
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S141657
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the physical and training characteristics of recreational marathon runners within finish time bandings (2.5–3 h, 3–3.5 h, 3.5–4 h, 4–4.5 h and >4.5 h). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 97 recreational marathon runners (age 42.4 ± 9.9 years; mass 69.2 ± 11.3 kg; stature 172.8 ± 9.1 cm), with a marathon finish time of 229.1 ± 48.7 min, of whom n = 34 were female and n = 63 were male, completed an incremental treadmill test for the determination of lactate threshold (LT1), lactate turn point (LT2) and running economy (RE). Following a 7-min recovery, they completed a test to volitional exhaustion starting at LT2 for the assessment of [Formula: see text]. In addition, all participants completed a questionnaire gathering information on their current training regimes exploring weekly distances, training frequencies, types of sessions, longest run in a week, with estimations of training speed, and load and volume derived from these data. RESULTS: Training frequency was shown to be significantly greater for the 2.5–3 h group compared to the 3.5–4 h runners (P < 0.001) and >4.5 h group (P = 0.004), while distance per session (km·session(−1)) was significantly greater for the 2.5–3 h group (16.1 ± 4.2) compared to the 3.5–4 h group (15.5 ± 5.2; P = 0.01) and >4.5 h group (10.3 ± 2.6; P = 0.001). Race speed correlated with LT1 (r = 0.791), LT2 (r = 0.721) and distance per session (r = 0.563). CONCLUSION: The data highlight profound differences for key components of marathon running ([Formula: see text] , LT1, LT2, RE and % [Formula: see text]) within a group of recreational runners with the discriminating training variables being training frequency and the absolute training speed.