Cargando…

Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury—A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model

INTRODUCTION: In open book injuries type Tile B1.1 or B1.2 also classified as APC II (anteroposterior compression), it remains controversial, if a fixation of the anterior ring provides sufficient stability or a fixation of the posterior ring should be included. Therefore the relative motion at the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stuby, Fabian M., Lenz, Mark, Doebele, Stefan, Agarwal, Yash, Skulev, Hristo, Ochs, Björn G., Zwingmann, Jörn, Gueorguiev, Boyko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5703512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29176772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184000
_version_ 1783281694360469504
author Stuby, Fabian M.
Lenz, Mark
Doebele, Stefan
Agarwal, Yash
Skulev, Hristo
Ochs, Björn G.
Zwingmann, Jörn
Gueorguiev, Boyko
author_facet Stuby, Fabian M.
Lenz, Mark
Doebele, Stefan
Agarwal, Yash
Skulev, Hristo
Ochs, Björn G.
Zwingmann, Jörn
Gueorguiev, Boyko
author_sort Stuby, Fabian M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In open book injuries type Tile B1.1 or B1.2 also classified as APC II (anteroposterior compression), it remains controversial, if a fixation of the anterior ring provides sufficient stability or a fixation of the posterior ring should be included. Therefore the relative motion at the sacroiliac joint was quantified in a two-leg alternating load biomechanical pelvis model in the intact, the injured and the restored pelvis. METHODS: Fresh-frozen intact (I) pelvises (n = 6) were subjected to a non-destructive cyclic test under sinosuidal axial two-leg alternating load with progressively increasing amplitude. Afterwards an open book injury (J) including the anterior ligament complex of the left sacroiliac joint, the sacrospinal and sacrotuberal ligaments (Tile B1.1) was created and the specimens were retested. Finally, the symphysis was stabilized with a modular fixation system (1-, 2- or 4-rod configuration) (R) and specimens were cyclically retested. Relative motion at the sacroiliac joint was captured at both sacroiliac joints by motion tracking system at two load levels of 170 N and 340 N during all tests. RESULTS: Relative sacroiliac joint movements at both load levels were significantly higher in the J-state compared to the I-state, excluding superoinferior translational movement. With exception of the anteroposterior translational movement at 340N, the relative sacroiliac joint movements after each of the three reconstructions (1-, 2-, 4-rod fixation) were significantly smaller compared to the J-state and did not differ significantly to the I-state, but stayed above the values of the latter. Relative movements did not differ significantly in a direct comparison between the 1-rod, 2-rod and 4-rod fixations. CONCLUSION: Symphyseal locked plating significantly reduces relative movement of the sacroiliac joint in open book injuries type Tile B1.1 or B1.2 (APC II) but cannot fully restore the situation of the intact sacroiliac joint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5703512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57035122017-12-08 Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury—A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model Stuby, Fabian M. Lenz, Mark Doebele, Stefan Agarwal, Yash Skulev, Hristo Ochs, Björn G. Zwingmann, Jörn Gueorguiev, Boyko PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: In open book injuries type Tile B1.1 or B1.2 also classified as APC II (anteroposterior compression), it remains controversial, if a fixation of the anterior ring provides sufficient stability or a fixation of the posterior ring should be included. Therefore the relative motion at the sacroiliac joint was quantified in a two-leg alternating load biomechanical pelvis model in the intact, the injured and the restored pelvis. METHODS: Fresh-frozen intact (I) pelvises (n = 6) were subjected to a non-destructive cyclic test under sinosuidal axial two-leg alternating load with progressively increasing amplitude. Afterwards an open book injury (J) including the anterior ligament complex of the left sacroiliac joint, the sacrospinal and sacrotuberal ligaments (Tile B1.1) was created and the specimens were retested. Finally, the symphysis was stabilized with a modular fixation system (1-, 2- or 4-rod configuration) (R) and specimens were cyclically retested. Relative motion at the sacroiliac joint was captured at both sacroiliac joints by motion tracking system at two load levels of 170 N and 340 N during all tests. RESULTS: Relative sacroiliac joint movements at both load levels were significantly higher in the J-state compared to the I-state, excluding superoinferior translational movement. With exception of the anteroposterior translational movement at 340N, the relative sacroiliac joint movements after each of the three reconstructions (1-, 2-, 4-rod fixation) were significantly smaller compared to the J-state and did not differ significantly to the I-state, but stayed above the values of the latter. Relative movements did not differ significantly in a direct comparison between the 1-rod, 2-rod and 4-rod fixations. CONCLUSION: Symphyseal locked plating significantly reduces relative movement of the sacroiliac joint in open book injuries type Tile B1.1 or B1.2 (APC II) but cannot fully restore the situation of the intact sacroiliac joint. Public Library of Science 2017-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5703512/ /pubmed/29176772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184000 Text en © 2017 Stuby et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stuby, Fabian M.
Lenz, Mark
Doebele, Stefan
Agarwal, Yash
Skulev, Hristo
Ochs, Björn G.
Zwingmann, Jörn
Gueorguiev, Boyko
Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury—A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model
title Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury—A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model
title_full Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury—A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model
title_fullStr Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury—A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model
title_full_unstemmed Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury—A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model
title_short Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury—A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model
title_sort symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior si joint injury—a biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5703512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29176772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184000
work_keys_str_mv AT stubyfabianm symphysealfixationinopenbookinjuriescannotfullycompensateanteriorsijointinjuryabiomechanicalstudyinatwolegalternatingloadmodel
AT lenzmark symphysealfixationinopenbookinjuriescannotfullycompensateanteriorsijointinjuryabiomechanicalstudyinatwolegalternatingloadmodel
AT doebelestefan symphysealfixationinopenbookinjuriescannotfullycompensateanteriorsijointinjuryabiomechanicalstudyinatwolegalternatingloadmodel
AT agarwalyash symphysealfixationinopenbookinjuriescannotfullycompensateanteriorsijointinjuryabiomechanicalstudyinatwolegalternatingloadmodel
AT skulevhristo symphysealfixationinopenbookinjuriescannotfullycompensateanteriorsijointinjuryabiomechanicalstudyinatwolegalternatingloadmodel
AT ochsbjorng symphysealfixationinopenbookinjuriescannotfullycompensateanteriorsijointinjuryabiomechanicalstudyinatwolegalternatingloadmodel
AT zwingmannjorn symphysealfixationinopenbookinjuriescannotfullycompensateanteriorsijointinjuryabiomechanicalstudyinatwolegalternatingloadmodel
AT gueorguievboyko symphysealfixationinopenbookinjuriescannotfullycompensateanteriorsijointinjuryabiomechanicalstudyinatwolegalternatingloadmodel