Cargando…

In Situ Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils with and without Alcohol on Oral Biofilm: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Currently, there is little evidence on the in situ antibacterial activity of essential oils (EO) without alcohol. This study aimed to evaluate in situ the substantivity and antiplaque effect on the plaque-like biofilm (PL-biofilm) of two solutions, a traditional formulation that contains EO with alc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quintas, Victor, Prada-López, Isabel, Carreira, María J., Suárez-Quintanilla, David, Balsa-Castro, Carlos, Tomás, Inmaculada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5703870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02162
_version_ 1783281761556365312
author Quintas, Victor
Prada-López, Isabel
Carreira, María J.
Suárez-Quintanilla, David
Balsa-Castro, Carlos
Tomás, Inmaculada
author_facet Quintas, Victor
Prada-López, Isabel
Carreira, María J.
Suárez-Quintanilla, David
Balsa-Castro, Carlos
Tomás, Inmaculada
author_sort Quintas, Victor
collection PubMed
description Currently, there is little evidence on the in situ antibacterial activity of essential oils (EO) without alcohol. This study aimed to evaluate in situ the substantivity and antiplaque effect on the plaque-like biofilm (PL-biofilm) of two solutions, a traditional formulation that contains EO with alcohol (T-EO) and an alcohol-free formulation of EO (Af-EO). Eighteen healthy adults performed a single mouthwash of: T-EO, Af-EO, and sterile water (WATER) after wearing an individualized disk-holding splint for 2 days. The bacterial viability (BV) and thickness of the PL-biofilm were quantified at baseline, 30 s, and 1, 3, 5, and 7 h post-rinsing (Test 1). Subsequently, each volunteer wore the splint for 4 days, applying two daily mouthwashes of: T-EO, Af-EO, and WATER. The BV, thickness, and covering grade (CG) of the PL-biofilm were quantified (Test 2). Samples were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy after staining with the LIVE/DEAD® BacLight™ solution. To conduct the computations of the BV automatically, a Matlab toolbox called Dentius Biofilm was developed. In test 1, both EO antiseptics had a similar antibacterial effect, reducing BV after a single rinse compared to the WATER, and keeping it below baseline levels up to 7 h post-rinse (P < 0.001). The mean thickness of the PL-biofilm after rinsing was not affected by any of the EO formulations and ranged from 18.58 to 20.19 μm. After 4 days, the T-EO and Af-EO solutions were significantly more effective than the WATER, reducing the BV, thickness, and CG of the PL-biofilm (P < 0.001). Although, both EO antiseptics presented a similar bactericidal activity, the Af-EO rinses led to more significant reductions in the thickness and CG of the PL-biofilm than the T-EO rinses (thickness = 7.90 vs. 9.92 μm, P = 0.012; CG = 33.36 vs. 46.61%, P = 0.001). In conclusion, both essential oils antiseptics had very high immediate antibacterial activity and substantivity in situ on the 2-day PL-biofilm after a single mouthwash. In the 4-day PL-biofilm, both essential oils formulations demonstrated a very good antiplaque effect in situ, although the alcohol-free formula performed better at reducing the biofilm thickness and covering grade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5703870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57038702017-12-07 In Situ Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils with and without Alcohol on Oral Biofilm: A Randomized Clinical Trial Quintas, Victor Prada-López, Isabel Carreira, María J. Suárez-Quintanilla, David Balsa-Castro, Carlos Tomás, Inmaculada Front Microbiol Microbiology Currently, there is little evidence on the in situ antibacterial activity of essential oils (EO) without alcohol. This study aimed to evaluate in situ the substantivity and antiplaque effect on the plaque-like biofilm (PL-biofilm) of two solutions, a traditional formulation that contains EO with alcohol (T-EO) and an alcohol-free formulation of EO (Af-EO). Eighteen healthy adults performed a single mouthwash of: T-EO, Af-EO, and sterile water (WATER) after wearing an individualized disk-holding splint for 2 days. The bacterial viability (BV) and thickness of the PL-biofilm were quantified at baseline, 30 s, and 1, 3, 5, and 7 h post-rinsing (Test 1). Subsequently, each volunteer wore the splint for 4 days, applying two daily mouthwashes of: T-EO, Af-EO, and WATER. The BV, thickness, and covering grade (CG) of the PL-biofilm were quantified (Test 2). Samples were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy after staining with the LIVE/DEAD® BacLight™ solution. To conduct the computations of the BV automatically, a Matlab toolbox called Dentius Biofilm was developed. In test 1, both EO antiseptics had a similar antibacterial effect, reducing BV after a single rinse compared to the WATER, and keeping it below baseline levels up to 7 h post-rinse (P < 0.001). The mean thickness of the PL-biofilm after rinsing was not affected by any of the EO formulations and ranged from 18.58 to 20.19 μm. After 4 days, the T-EO and Af-EO solutions were significantly more effective than the WATER, reducing the BV, thickness, and CG of the PL-biofilm (P < 0.001). Although, both EO antiseptics presented a similar bactericidal activity, the Af-EO rinses led to more significant reductions in the thickness and CG of the PL-biofilm than the T-EO rinses (thickness = 7.90 vs. 9.92 μm, P = 0.012; CG = 33.36 vs. 46.61%, P = 0.001). In conclusion, both essential oils antiseptics had very high immediate antibacterial activity and substantivity in situ on the 2-day PL-biofilm after a single mouthwash. In the 4-day PL-biofilm, both essential oils formulations demonstrated a very good antiplaque effect in situ, although the alcohol-free formula performed better at reducing the biofilm thickness and covering grade. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5703870/ /pubmed/29218030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02162 Text en Copyright © 2017 Quintas, Prada-López, Carreira, Suárez-Quintanilla, Balsa-Castro and Tomás. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Quintas, Victor
Prada-López, Isabel
Carreira, María J.
Suárez-Quintanilla, David
Balsa-Castro, Carlos
Tomás, Inmaculada
In Situ Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils with and without Alcohol on Oral Biofilm: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title In Situ Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils with and without Alcohol on Oral Biofilm: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full In Situ Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils with and without Alcohol on Oral Biofilm: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr In Situ Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils with and without Alcohol on Oral Biofilm: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed In Situ Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils with and without Alcohol on Oral Biofilm: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short In Situ Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils with and without Alcohol on Oral Biofilm: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort in situ antibacterial activity of essential oils with and without alcohol on oral biofilm: a randomized clinical trial
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5703870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29218030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02162
work_keys_str_mv AT quintasvictor insituantibacterialactivityofessentialoilswithandwithoutalcoholonoralbiofilmarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pradalopezisabel insituantibacterialactivityofessentialoilswithandwithoutalcoholonoralbiofilmarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT carreiramariaj insituantibacterialactivityofessentialoilswithandwithoutalcoholonoralbiofilmarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT suarezquintanilladavid insituantibacterialactivityofessentialoilswithandwithoutalcoholonoralbiofilmarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT balsacastrocarlos insituantibacterialactivityofessentialoilswithandwithoutalcoholonoralbiofilmarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tomasinmaculada insituantibacterialactivityofessentialoilswithandwithoutalcoholonoralbiofilmarandomizedclinicaltrial