Cargando…

Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation

BACKGROUND: There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients’ subjective experiences gain importance in today’s healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramakers, Geerte G. J., Smulders, Yvette E., van Zon, Alice, Van Zanten, Gijsbert A., Grolman, Wilko, Stegeman, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29209150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y
_version_ 1783281882163576832
author Ramakers, Geerte G. J.
Smulders, Yvette E.
van Zon, Alice
Van Zanten, Gijsbert A.
Grolman, Wilko
Stegeman, Inge
author_facet Ramakers, Geerte G. J.
Smulders, Yvette E.
van Zon, Alice
Van Zanten, Gijsbert A.
Grolman, Wilko
Stegeman, Inge
author_sort Ramakers, Geerte G. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients’ subjective experiences gain importance in today’s healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlation between subjective (self-reported questionnaires) and objective (speech perception and localization) hearing test results in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Secondary, the correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests was compared between bilateral and unilateral CI patients. METHODS: Data for this study were prospectively collected as part of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Thirty-eight postlingually deafened adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either unilateral (n = 19) or bilateral (n = 19) cochlear implantation. We used data gathered after one year of follow-up. We studied the correlation between objectively measured speech perception and localization skills on the one hand and related domains of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) on the other hand. We also compared these correlations between unilateral and bilateral CI users. RESULTS: We found significant weak to moderate negative correlations between the subjective test results (speech domain of the SSQ and the advanced speech perception domain of the NCIQ) and the related objective speech perception in noise test results (r = −0.33 to −0.48). A significant moderate correlation was found between the subjective test results (spatial domain of the SSQ) and the related objective localization test results (r = 0.59). The correlations in the group of bilateral CI patients (r = −0.28 to −0.54) did not differ significantly from the correlations in the group of unilateral CI patients (r = 0.15 to −0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Current objective tests do not fully reflect subjective everyday listening situations. This study elucidates the importance and necessity of questionnaires in the evaluation of cochlear implantation. Therefore, it is advised to evaluate both objective and subjective tests in CI patients on a regular basis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on March 11, 2009 in the Dutch Trial Register. Trial registration number: NTR1722.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5704382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57043822017-12-05 Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation Ramakers, Geerte G. J. Smulders, Yvette E. van Zon, Alice Van Zanten, Gijsbert A. Grolman, Wilko Stegeman, Inge BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients’ subjective experiences gain importance in today’s healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlation between subjective (self-reported questionnaires) and objective (speech perception and localization) hearing test results in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Secondary, the correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests was compared between bilateral and unilateral CI patients. METHODS: Data for this study were prospectively collected as part of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Thirty-eight postlingually deafened adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either unilateral (n = 19) or bilateral (n = 19) cochlear implantation. We used data gathered after one year of follow-up. We studied the correlation between objectively measured speech perception and localization skills on the one hand and related domains of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) on the other hand. We also compared these correlations between unilateral and bilateral CI users. RESULTS: We found significant weak to moderate negative correlations between the subjective test results (speech domain of the SSQ and the advanced speech perception domain of the NCIQ) and the related objective speech perception in noise test results (r = −0.33 to −0.48). A significant moderate correlation was found between the subjective test results (spatial domain of the SSQ) and the related objective localization test results (r = 0.59). The correlations in the group of bilateral CI patients (r = −0.28 to −0.54) did not differ significantly from the correlations in the group of unilateral CI patients (r = 0.15 to −0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Current objective tests do not fully reflect subjective everyday listening situations. This study elucidates the importance and necessity of questionnaires in the evaluation of cochlear implantation. Therefore, it is advised to evaluate both objective and subjective tests in CI patients on a regular basis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on March 11, 2009 in the Dutch Trial Register. Trial registration number: NTR1722. BioMed Central 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5704382/ /pubmed/29209150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ramakers, Geerte G. J.
Smulders, Yvette E.
van Zon, Alice
Van Zanten, Gijsbert A.
Grolman, Wilko
Stegeman, Inge
Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation
title Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation
title_full Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation
title_fullStr Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation
title_short Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation
title_sort correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29209150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ramakersgeertegj correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation
AT smuldersyvettee correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation
AT vanzonalice correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation
AT vanzantengijsberta correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation
AT grolmanwilko correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation
AT stegemaninge correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation