Cargando…
Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation
BACKGROUND: There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients’ subjective experiences gain importance in today’s healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29209150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y |
_version_ | 1783281882163576832 |
---|---|
author | Ramakers, Geerte G. J. Smulders, Yvette E. van Zon, Alice Van Zanten, Gijsbert A. Grolman, Wilko Stegeman, Inge |
author_facet | Ramakers, Geerte G. J. Smulders, Yvette E. van Zon, Alice Van Zanten, Gijsbert A. Grolman, Wilko Stegeman, Inge |
author_sort | Ramakers, Geerte G. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients’ subjective experiences gain importance in today’s healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlation between subjective (self-reported questionnaires) and objective (speech perception and localization) hearing test results in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Secondary, the correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests was compared between bilateral and unilateral CI patients. METHODS: Data for this study were prospectively collected as part of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Thirty-eight postlingually deafened adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either unilateral (n = 19) or bilateral (n = 19) cochlear implantation. We used data gathered after one year of follow-up. We studied the correlation between objectively measured speech perception and localization skills on the one hand and related domains of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) on the other hand. We also compared these correlations between unilateral and bilateral CI users. RESULTS: We found significant weak to moderate negative correlations between the subjective test results (speech domain of the SSQ and the advanced speech perception domain of the NCIQ) and the related objective speech perception in noise test results (r = −0.33 to −0.48). A significant moderate correlation was found between the subjective test results (spatial domain of the SSQ) and the related objective localization test results (r = 0.59). The correlations in the group of bilateral CI patients (r = −0.28 to −0.54) did not differ significantly from the correlations in the group of unilateral CI patients (r = 0.15 to −0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Current objective tests do not fully reflect subjective everyday listening situations. This study elucidates the importance and necessity of questionnaires in the evaluation of cochlear implantation. Therefore, it is advised to evaluate both objective and subjective tests in CI patients on a regular basis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on March 11, 2009 in the Dutch Trial Register. Trial registration number: NTR1722. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5704382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57043822017-12-05 Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation Ramakers, Geerte G. J. Smulders, Yvette E. van Zon, Alice Van Zanten, Gijsbert A. Grolman, Wilko Stegeman, Inge BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There are many methods for assessing hearing performance after cochlear implantation. Standard evaluations often encompass objective hearing tests only, while patients’ subjective experiences gain importance in today’s healthcare. The aim of the current study was to analyze the correlation between subjective (self-reported questionnaires) and objective (speech perception and localization) hearing test results in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Secondary, the correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests was compared between bilateral and unilateral CI patients. METHODS: Data for this study were prospectively collected as part of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Thirty-eight postlingually deafened adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either unilateral (n = 19) or bilateral (n = 19) cochlear implantation. We used data gathered after one year of follow-up. We studied the correlation between objectively measured speech perception and localization skills on the one hand and related domains of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) on the other hand. We also compared these correlations between unilateral and bilateral CI users. RESULTS: We found significant weak to moderate negative correlations between the subjective test results (speech domain of the SSQ and the advanced speech perception domain of the NCIQ) and the related objective speech perception in noise test results (r = −0.33 to −0.48). A significant moderate correlation was found between the subjective test results (spatial domain of the SSQ) and the related objective localization test results (r = 0.59). The correlations in the group of bilateral CI patients (r = −0.28 to −0.54) did not differ significantly from the correlations in the group of unilateral CI patients (r = 0.15 to −0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Current objective tests do not fully reflect subjective everyday listening situations. This study elucidates the importance and necessity of questionnaires in the evaluation of cochlear implantation. Therefore, it is advised to evaluate both objective and subjective tests in CI patients on a regular basis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on March 11, 2009 in the Dutch Trial Register. Trial registration number: NTR1722. BioMed Central 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5704382/ /pubmed/29209150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ramakers, Geerte G. J. Smulders, Yvette E. van Zon, Alice Van Zanten, Gijsbert A. Grolman, Wilko Stegeman, Inge Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation |
title | Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation |
title_full | Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation |
title_fullStr | Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation |
title_short | Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation |
title_sort | correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29209150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramakersgeertegj correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation AT smuldersyvettee correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation AT vanzonalice correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation AT vanzantengijsberta correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation AT grolmanwilko correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation AT stegemaninge correlationbetweensubjectiveandobjectivehearingtestsafterunilateralandbilateralcochlearimplantation |