Cargando…
Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review
BACKGROUND: The review of human participant research by Research Ethics Committees (RECs) or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) is a complex multi-faceted process that cannot be reduced to an algorithm. However, this does not give RECs/ IRBs permission to be inconsistent in their specific requiremen...
Autores principales: | Trace, Samantha, Kolstoe, Simon Erik |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29179709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0224-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Determining the level of data sharing, and number of publications, from research databases that have been given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Trace, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evidence from UK Research Ethics Committee members on what makes a good research ethics review, and what can be improved
por: Sidaway, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Can UK NHS research ethics committees effectively monitor publication and outcome reporting bias?
por: Begum, Rasheda, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Denneny, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Ranking Research Methodology by Risk — a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members
por: Kolstoe, Simon E., et al.
Publicado: (2023)