Cargando…

Tumour diameter is not reliable for management of non-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Small non-functioning pancreatic NETs (pNETs) ≤2 cm can pose a management dilemma in terms of surveillance or resection. There is evidence to suggest that a surveillance approach can be considered since there are no significant radiological changes observed in lesions during long-term follow-up. How...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mills, Logan, Drymousis, Panagiotis, Vashist, Yogesh, Burdelski, Christoph, Prachalias, Andreas, Srinivasan, Parthi, Menon, Krishna, Cotoi, Corina, Khan, Saboor, Cave, Judith, Armstrong, Thomas, Weickert, Martin O, Izbicki, Jakob, Schrader, Joerg, Frilling, Andreja, Ramage, John K, Srirajaskanthan, Raj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29150545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0293
Descripción
Sumario:Small non-functioning pancreatic NETs (pNETs) ≤2 cm can pose a management dilemma in terms of surveillance or resection. There is evidence to suggest that a surveillance approach can be considered since there are no significant radiological changes observed in lesions during long-term follow-up. However, other studies have suggested loco-regional spread can be present in ≤2 cm pNETs. The aim of this study was to characterise the prevalence of malignant features and identify any useful predictive variables in a surgically resected cohort of pNETs. 418 patients with pNETs were identified from 5 NET centres. Of these 227 were included for main analysis of tumour characteristics. Mean age of patients was 57 years, 47% were female. The median follow-up was 48.2 months. Malignant features were identified in 38% of ≤2 cm pNETs. ROC analysis showed that the current cut-off of 20 mm had a sensitivity of 84% for malignancy. The rate of malignant features is in keeping with other surgical series and challenges the belief that small pNETs have a low malignant potential. This study does not support a 20 mm size cut-off as being a solitary safe parameter to exclude malignancy in pNETs.