Cargando…
The costs and benefits of water fluoridation in NZ
BACKGROUND: Implementing community water fluoridation involves costs, but these need to be considered against the likely benefits. We aimed to assess the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness of water fluoridation in New Zealand (NZ) in terms of expenditure and quality-adjusted life years. METHODS: Ba...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29179712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0433-y |
_version_ | 1783281911176626176 |
---|---|
author | Moore, David Poynton, Matthew Broadbent, Jonathan M. Thomson, W. Murray |
author_facet | Moore, David Poynton, Matthew Broadbent, Jonathan M. Thomson, W. Murray |
author_sort | Moore, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implementing community water fluoridation involves costs, but these need to be considered against the likely benefits. We aimed to assess the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness of water fluoridation in New Zealand (NZ) in terms of expenditure and quality-adjusted life years. METHODS: Based on published studies, we determined the risk reduction effects of fluoridation, we quantified its health benefits using standardised dental indexes, and we calculated financial savings from averted treatment. We analysed NZ water supplies to estimate the financial costs of fluoridation. We devised a method to represent dental caries experience in quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS: Over 20 years, the net discounted saving from adding fluoride to reticulated water supplies supplying populations over 500 would be NZ$1401 million, a nine times pay-off. Between 8800 and 13,700 quality-adjusted life years would be gained. While fluoridating reticulated water supplies for large communities is cost-effective, it is unlikely to be so with populations smaller than 500. CONCLUSIONS: Community water fluoridation remains highly cost-effective for all but very small communities. The health benefits—while (on average) small per person—add up to a substantial reduction in the national disease burden across all ethnic and socioeconomic groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-017-0433-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5704512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57045122017-12-05 The costs and benefits of water fluoridation in NZ Moore, David Poynton, Matthew Broadbent, Jonathan M. Thomson, W. Murray BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Implementing community water fluoridation involves costs, but these need to be considered against the likely benefits. We aimed to assess the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness of water fluoridation in New Zealand (NZ) in terms of expenditure and quality-adjusted life years. METHODS: Based on published studies, we determined the risk reduction effects of fluoridation, we quantified its health benefits using standardised dental indexes, and we calculated financial savings from averted treatment. We analysed NZ water supplies to estimate the financial costs of fluoridation. We devised a method to represent dental caries experience in quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS: Over 20 years, the net discounted saving from adding fluoride to reticulated water supplies supplying populations over 500 would be NZ$1401 million, a nine times pay-off. Between 8800 and 13,700 quality-adjusted life years would be gained. While fluoridating reticulated water supplies for large communities is cost-effective, it is unlikely to be so with populations smaller than 500. CONCLUSIONS: Community water fluoridation remains highly cost-effective for all but very small communities. The health benefits—while (on average) small per person—add up to a substantial reduction in the national disease burden across all ethnic and socioeconomic groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-017-0433-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5704512/ /pubmed/29179712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0433-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moore, David Poynton, Matthew Broadbent, Jonathan M. Thomson, W. Murray The costs and benefits of water fluoridation in NZ |
title | The costs and benefits of water fluoridation in NZ |
title_full | The costs and benefits of water fluoridation in NZ |
title_fullStr | The costs and benefits of water fluoridation in NZ |
title_full_unstemmed | The costs and benefits of water fluoridation in NZ |
title_short | The costs and benefits of water fluoridation in NZ |
title_sort | costs and benefits of water fluoridation in nz |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29179712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0433-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooredavid thecostsandbenefitsofwaterfluoridationinnz AT poyntonmatthew thecostsandbenefitsofwaterfluoridationinnz AT broadbentjonathanm thecostsandbenefitsofwaterfluoridationinnz AT thomsonwmurray thecostsandbenefitsofwaterfluoridationinnz AT mooredavid costsandbenefitsofwaterfluoridationinnz AT poyntonmatthew costsandbenefitsofwaterfluoridationinnz AT broadbentjonathanm costsandbenefitsofwaterfluoridationinnz AT thomsonwmurray costsandbenefitsofwaterfluoridationinnz |