Cargando…

Men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin cancer in men. Screening for prostate cancer is widely accepted; however concerns regarding the harms outweighing the benefits of screening exist. Although patient’s play a pivotal role in the decision making process, men may not be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, Laura J., Wong, Germaine, Craig, Jonathan C., Hanson, Camilla S., Ju, Angela, Howard, Kirsten, Usherwood, Tim, Lau, Howard, Tong, Allison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29182649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188258
_version_ 1783282009512083456
author James, Laura J.
Wong, Germaine
Craig, Jonathan C.
Hanson, Camilla S.
Ju, Angela
Howard, Kirsten
Usherwood, Tim
Lau, Howard
Tong, Allison
author_facet James, Laura J.
Wong, Germaine
Craig, Jonathan C.
Hanson, Camilla S.
Ju, Angela
Howard, Kirsten
Usherwood, Tim
Lau, Howard
Tong, Allison
author_sort James, Laura J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin cancer in men. Screening for prostate cancer is widely accepted; however concerns regarding the harms outweighing the benefits of screening exist. Although patient’s play a pivotal role in the decision making process, men may not be aware of the controversies regarding prostate cancer screening. Therefore we aimed to describe men’s attitudes, beliefs and experiences of prostate cancer screening. METHODS: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies on men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening. Electronic databases and reference lists were searched to October 2016. FINDINGS: Sixty studies involving 3,029 men aged from 18–89 years, who had been screened for prostate cancer by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) or Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) and not screened, across eight countries were included. Five themes were identified: Social prompting (trusting professional opinion, motivation from family and friends, proximity and prominence of cancer); gaining decisional confidence (overcoming fears, survival imperative, peace of mind, mental preparation, prioritising wellbeing); preserving masculinity (bodily invasion, losing sexuality, threatening manhood, medical avoidance); avoiding the unknown and uncertainties (taboo of cancer-related death, lacking tangible cause, physiological and symptomatic obscurity, ambiguity of the procedure, confusing controversies); and prohibitive costs. CONCLUSIONS: Men are willing to participate in prostate cancer screening to prevent cancer and gain reassurance about their health, particularly when supported or prompted by their social networks or healthcare providers. However, to do so they needed to mentally overcome fears of losing their masculinity and accept the intrusiveness of screening, the ambiguities about the necessity and the potential for substantial costs. Addressing the concerns and priorities of men may facilitate informed decisions about prostate cancer screening and improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5705146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57051462017-12-08 Men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies James, Laura J. Wong, Germaine Craig, Jonathan C. Hanson, Camilla S. Ju, Angela Howard, Kirsten Usherwood, Tim Lau, Howard Tong, Allison PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin cancer in men. Screening for prostate cancer is widely accepted; however concerns regarding the harms outweighing the benefits of screening exist. Although patient’s play a pivotal role in the decision making process, men may not be aware of the controversies regarding prostate cancer screening. Therefore we aimed to describe men’s attitudes, beliefs and experiences of prostate cancer screening. METHODS: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies on men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening. Electronic databases and reference lists were searched to October 2016. FINDINGS: Sixty studies involving 3,029 men aged from 18–89 years, who had been screened for prostate cancer by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) or Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) and not screened, across eight countries were included. Five themes were identified: Social prompting (trusting professional opinion, motivation from family and friends, proximity and prominence of cancer); gaining decisional confidence (overcoming fears, survival imperative, peace of mind, mental preparation, prioritising wellbeing); preserving masculinity (bodily invasion, losing sexuality, threatening manhood, medical avoidance); avoiding the unknown and uncertainties (taboo of cancer-related death, lacking tangible cause, physiological and symptomatic obscurity, ambiguity of the procedure, confusing controversies); and prohibitive costs. CONCLUSIONS: Men are willing to participate in prostate cancer screening to prevent cancer and gain reassurance about their health, particularly when supported or prompted by their social networks or healthcare providers. However, to do so they needed to mentally overcome fears of losing their masculinity and accept the intrusiveness of screening, the ambiguities about the necessity and the potential for substantial costs. Addressing the concerns and priorities of men may facilitate informed decisions about prostate cancer screening and improve patient satisfaction and outcomes. Public Library of Science 2017-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5705146/ /pubmed/29182649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188258 Text en © 2017 James et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
James, Laura J.
Wong, Germaine
Craig, Jonathan C.
Hanson, Camilla S.
Ju, Angela
Howard, Kirsten
Usherwood, Tim
Lau, Howard
Tong, Allison
Men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title Men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_full Men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_fullStr Men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_full_unstemmed Men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_short Men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies
title_sort men’s perspectives of prostate cancer screening: a systematic review of qualitative studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29182649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188258
work_keys_str_mv AT jameslauraj mensperspectivesofprostatecancerscreeningasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT wonggermaine mensperspectivesofprostatecancerscreeningasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT craigjonathanc mensperspectivesofprostatecancerscreeningasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT hansoncamillas mensperspectivesofprostatecancerscreeningasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT juangela mensperspectivesofprostatecancerscreeningasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT howardkirsten mensperspectivesofprostatecancerscreeningasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT usherwoodtim mensperspectivesofprostatecancerscreeningasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT lauhoward mensperspectivesofprostatecancerscreeningasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies
AT tongallison mensperspectivesofprostatecancerscreeningasystematicreviewofqualitativestudies